메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류
인문학
인문학 일반 역사학 철학 종교학 어문학 기타 인문학
사회과학
사회과학 일반 경영학 관광학 교육학 군사학 문헌정보학 법학 사회학 신문방송학 심리과학 정치외교학 지리학 행정학 경제학 무역학 인류학 기타 사회과학
자연과학
자연과학 일반 물리학 생물학 생활과학 수학·통계학 천문학 지구과학 화학 기타 자연과학
공학
공학 일반 건축공학 기계공학 산업공학 재료·에너지공학 전기전자공학 조선해양공학 화학공학 컴퓨터학 기타공학
의약학
의학 일반 간호학 수의학 약학 한의학 기초의학 임상의학 기타 의약학
농수해양학
농수해양학 일반 농학 수산학 식품과학 임학 축산학 해상운송학 기타 농수해양학
예술체육학
예술 일반 디자인 미술 미용 사진 음악학 의상 체육 공연매체예술 기타 예술체육학
복합학
학제간연구 과학기술학 뇌인지과학 기술정책 기타 복합학

ENG

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
고려대학교 법학연구원 고려법학 고려법학 제56호
발행연도
2010.1
수록면
293 - 333 (41page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Compared to a liberal right labeled a 19th century right, the driving force to support a social right, called as a 20th century right,seems to have deteriorated since the latter half of the 20th century. In particular, a shrinking social state is prevailing more evidently in the developed countries in the wake of many changes in the economic environment or population composition (aging society), etc. Korea, as one of emerging developed countries, is not exceptional from this global trend; how one will deal with such challenges is recognized as a pressing issue. Actually, the above-stated changes might be closely related to the national pension system reform issues in which there is a considerable controversy over its necessity;therefore, this paper attempts to examine these globally prevailing challenges and to consider alternatives by analyzing the national pension system. In fact, there are various analyses and views concerning the fundamental causes of bringing about the Koran national pension crisis. Korea had conducted parametric reforms in 1998 and 2007; however, it is difficult to say that such measures perfectly solve the abovementioned problems. Therefore, the pension system still needs more lasting and continuous improvements. The direction of reform of the national pension system should consider financial stabilization, an alternative to financial exhaustion or inter-generation inequality as pivotal elements in considering various reform measures such as raising pension premiums, reducing the benefits or changing the fund management methods. However, such approaches should keep in mind the aspect that the national pension system is purported to realize the idea of the social state. Therefore,the goal of the national pension system reformation is to enhance the solidarity between large and low-income earners, to support socially weak groups and to guarantee the relevant social security net; those goals could be considered as the important elements of national pension system reform, as well as the previously mentioned ones such as financial stabilization or durability. In addition, the alleged retreat of the social state, recognized in pension premium increase or pension benefit cut, should not lead to an unequal and forced sacrifice for the socially weak groups. The level of pension benefit, as long as it is not so-called “pocket money pension”, should correspond to its goal to provide the minimum material foundation to secure the decent standard of living in coping with difficulties (e.g. disability, disease or aging) the people face in their lives. In order to do so, raising pension premiums is required only on the condition of making effort to gain public support for such an option. In other words, pension reform measures should set and apply income criteria that the people can understand reasonably and clearly in calculating the pension premium. Furthermore, more systemic measures should continuously provide the public with confidence that this income standard scheme could apply to regional pension scheme participants in a rational way. Lastly, the most important thing is that the pension reform should seek the public consensus and support regarding the necessity and method of the pension reform by faithfully offering explanation and adequate persuasion to the people. The very social agreement enable fruitful discussion regarding a real sociality and fair social burden sharing; furthermore, this could prevent unequal sacrifice that could be often forced under the mask of the reform; the reason is that a cut in social benefits, found in an increase in pension premiums or a lowering in income replacement ratio, could cause more serious, far-reaching native effects to the socially weak groups.
#사회국가 #사회적 기본권 #국민연금제도 #국민연금개혁 #고령화사회 #세대 간 평등 #social state #social rights #the national pension system #reform of the national pension system #aging society #inter-generation equality

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (45)

참고문헌 신청
Adolf-Arndt-Kreis / 2005 / Stachel der Gerechtigkeit -Die Zukunft des Sozialstaates- google schola Blanke, Hermann-Josef / 2007 / Die Reform des Sozialstaates zwischen Freiheitlichkeit und Solidaritat google schola Boll, Friedhelm / 2008 / Der Sozialstaat in der Krise -Deutschland im internationalen Vergleich- google schola Butzer, Hermann / 2008 / Der Generationentrag. Zu Herkunft und Inhalt eines sozialstaatlichen Schlusselbegriffs, in: Festschrift fur Friedrich E. Schnapp zum 70. Geburtstag : 367 ~ 38 google schola Butzer, Hermann / 2008 / Organisation und Verfahren im sozialen Rechtsstaat. Festschrift fur Friedrich E. Schnapp zum 70. Geburtstag google schola

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0