메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한남대학교 과학기술법연구원 과학기술법연구 과학기술법연구 제11권 제2호
발행연도
2006.1
수록면
213 - 241 (29page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Ireland had been worried about the Sellafield MOX Plant which was constructed by the United kingdom near the Ireland Sea. Although Ireland asked the Arbitral Tribunal under the Annex 7 of the UNCLOS Convention to render a judgement on this case, she applied the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea(ITLOS) for a provisional measure to protect the maritime environment before the judgement. Ireland wanted the ITLOS order United Kingdom to stop the operation of the MOX production and suspend the transportation of the nuclear wastes. Denying the possibility of marine pollution by nuclear wastes, United Kingdom asked the ITLOS reject the Ireland application. According to the Law of the Sea Convention, if the Arbitral Tribunal under the Annex 7 of the UNCLOS Convention does not have the prima facie jurisdiction to entertain the case, ITLOS can not order any provisional measure. In spite of opposition from the United kingdom, ITLOS confirmed its jurisdiction to this case. Ireland applied for provisional measures to prevent serious damage to its environmental rights. On the other hand, United Kingdom denied the possibility of that kind of damage. Considering the commitment from the United Kingdom and the short period of provisional measure, ITLOS ordered relatively light provisional measures. ITLOS asked both sides exchange information on various effects arising from the operation of the MOX plant and cooperate to formulate policies to protect themselves from possible nuclear wastes pollution.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0