메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
국제언어인문학회 인문언어 인문언어 제11권 제2호
발행연도
2009.1
수록면
253 - 272 (20page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Most writers say there are nothing to do with between their works and their private lives. Therefore, when someone asks the relationship between the works and author's lives, they usually deny the relationship. But there are many works of which characters are the mirror up to the author themselves. Especially Pinter's Betrayal illustrates his own marital crack-up. Pinter's plays are commonly triggered by a sharp memory of some personal experience. Pinter had utilized not just his own experience but also that of friends and acquaintances. He was to do the same in Betrayal. It is a play about the way of betryal of oneself and others through the whole system of human relationship. It also shows Pinter, more than in any of his previous plays, using directly the circumstances of his own life. As the author writes about actual events, his friends and lovers who see the play come out saying, “Oh, it's the story of my life.” Then using these materials is the author's moral dilemma? Author takes what he needs from actual experience and invests it with dramatic signification. But as Pinter says “there are some things one remembers even though they may never have happened.” At the same time in place of the audience, we can sympathize liable characters more than ever before.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (7)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0