메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
어문연구학회 어문연구 어문연구 제65권
발행연도
2010.1
수록면
77 - 101 (25page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The First aim of this paper is to distinguish BP(bojosa phrase) as grammatical topic from BP as not grammatical topic. The second aim is to investigate the syntactic-semantic characteristics of two class of BP. I distinguish the grammatical topic from discourse-pragmatic topic. The grammatical topic, which is one of the grammatical relations, is a sentence constituent that is not the established grammatical relations(subject, object, complement, adnominal, adverbial, vocative). The grammatical topic have ‘aboutness' as its basic semantic property and is analysed as discourse-pragmatic topic or focus in appropriate context. And the grammatical topic has the syntactic-semantic relations with other sentence constituents. Im, hong-bin(2007), which insists that all BPs are grammatical topic, have two major problems. One is not to be able to judge whether 'NP-가/NP-을' is subject/object or grammatical topic. The other is that the grammatical topics functioning like subject, object etc is not to correspond with the definition of grammatical topic. The BPs which is construed as subject, object, complement etc is not grammatical topic. There are three classes of grammatical topic. The first class is the BPs as adjunct which have not status as the established grammatical relations. The second class is the BPs that are analyzed to have one more grammatical relations or one more thematic roles. The third class is the BPs that are never analyzed as the established grammatical relations in context which argument of verbs are elliptical.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (27)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0