메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
대한중국학회 중국학 중국학 제50호
발행연도
2015.1
수록면
51 - 73 (23page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
An advocate of the exclusive use of Hangul asks to an advocate of mixed use of Chinese characters. We don't have any problems in delivery of meaning by only using of Hangul, and don't get any educational effects by teaching Chinese characters, then why do we have to study Chinese characters mixed that are the remnants of Japanese colonial era, why do we increase studying burden and private education? On the other hand, an advocate of mixed use of Chinese characters ask to an advocate of the exclusive use of Hangul. We can't communicate clearly by only using of Hangul, and ㄴstudying Chinese characters strengthen thinking power, then why do we have to stop the mixed use of Chinese characters that is effective in education of students. There are big differences of opinion each other. How can we harmonize these two conflicting thoughts. In results, We have to stand not on the scene of a dispute but on the field of an education, and we have to watch and judge this problem as we think about my own child. Which is effective in understanding any vocaburary, and in improving Korean language ability? This question is the only one standard of choicing way to go. Learning and communicating capabilities, thinking and creating powers of students are the most important factors in judging way to go. Any other factors have to be excluded.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (8)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0