지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
“Personal Information Protection Act”(PIPA), a general law for personal date protection, guarantee the free exchange as well as the protection of the personal data. That clears the PIPA’s characteristics as the private law. If the personal information manager obtain the consent of the subject of information, the manager can process the personal information unconstrainedly, and The PIPA can admit the employer to process the worker’s personal data including providing a third person and using for any purpose other than intended ones, so long as he gets the worker’s consent. So, the worker’s consent in the PIPA functions as the master-key to obtain the legitimacy to process the personal data. But, due to the worker’s subordination to the employer, the real intention of workers as the subject of information is suspected. Furthermore, the PIPA article 15 (1) 6 should allow the personal information manager, without the consent of the subject of information, to process the personal data, if the manager demonstrate his legitimate interests which is limited to cases. Thus the employer not given the worker’s consent can assert his right to obtain the worker’s personal data for his legitimate interest in the facilities and human resources management.
The PIPA has a few blind spot. For example, the PIPA does not have any provisions of the biometrics. The employers use the worker’s biometrics for the facilities security and worker’s job description. The biometrics remain unchanged worker’s whole life, so if the biometrics abused, the damages are incalculable. The PIPA article 23 enacts a provision of the sensitive information (thought, beliefs, health information, etc.). The biometrics should be interpreted analogically as a sort of health information regulated so that it can regulated in the PIPA. Recently, the employer use the GPS and the electronic tag to trace the worker’s location data. The personal location data is regulated in “Act on the Protection, Use, etc., of Location Information”, but this act does not consider the unbalanced relationship of the employer and the worker, so the employer given the worker’s consent can get the worker’s location data freely.
The person who has the other party’s information rules those who can’t. If those who can’t is the worker, along with the subordination to the employer, he suffers from the double power-imbalance. To overcome the double imbalance, firstly, the regulations of processing the worker’s personal data should be established in the PIPA. As a role model, the German personal data protection act is in the process of revision, which tries to insert the worker’s data protection part in the act. When the PIPA is changed, the scope of individual object should be expanded. The current law regulates the workers who offer his service to the employers, but the job-seeker, retiree, and contract laborers have to be included. Moreover, in the illegal processing of the worker’s personal data, the workers should have the right of veto and immunity.
Secondly, to secure the truth of worker’s consent, in other words, to obtain the equal standing between the employer and the worker, the group decision of the labor-management representatives substitutes for the worker’s individual consent of processing his personal data. For that, the workers can entrust the representative such as the labour union representative with the right of agreement on processing.
Finally, on interpreting the legislation concerned on personal data protection containing the PIPA, the regulations should be construed in the principle of being involved in the occupation and of proportion. The principle of being involved in the occupation is relevant to interpret the employer’s legitimate interests on the processing the worker’s personal data, and if the employer’s processing of the worker’s personal data is proved to be involved in the occupation, in addition, the proportion between the profit of the employer and the damage of the workers should be well-balanced.
The PIPA has a few blind spot. For example, the PIPA does not have any provisions of the biometrics. The employers use the worker’s biometrics for the facilities security and worker’s job description. The biometrics remain unchanged worker’s whole life, so if the biometrics abused, the damages are incalculable. The PIPA article 23 enacts a provision of the sensitive information (thought, beliefs, health information, etc.). The biometrics should be interpreted analogically as a sort of health information regulated so that it can regulated in the PIPA. Recently, the employer use the GPS and the electronic tag to trace the worker’s location data. The personal location data is regulated in “Act on the Protection, Use, etc., of Location Information”, but this act does not consider the unbalanced relationship of the employer and the worker, so the employer given the worker’s consent can get the worker’s location data freely.
The person who has the other party’s information rules those who can’t. If those who can’t is the worker, along with the subordination to the employer, he suffers from the double power-imbalance. To overcome the double imbalance, firstly, the regulations of processing the worker’s personal data should be established in the PIPA. As a role model, the German personal data protection act is in the process of revision, which tries to insert the worker’s data protection part in the act. When the PIPA is changed, the scope of individual object should be expanded. The current law regulates the workers who offer his service to the employers, but the job-seeker, retiree, and contract laborers have to be included. Moreover, in the illegal processing of the worker’s personal data, the workers should have the right of veto and immunity.
Secondly, to secure the truth of worker’s consent, in other words, to obtain the equal standing between the employer and the worker, the group decision of the labor-management representatives substitutes for the worker’s individual consent of processing his personal data. For that, the workers can entrust the representative such as the labour union representative with the right of agreement on processing.
Finally, on interpreting the legislation concerned on personal data protection containing the PIPA, the regulations should be construed in the principle of being involved in the occupation and of proportion. The principle of being involved in the occupation is relevant to interpret the employer’s legitimate interests on the processing the worker’s personal data, and if the employer’s processing of the worker’s personal data is proved to be involved in the occupation, in addition, the proportion between the profit of the employer and the damage of the workers should be well-balanced.
목차
Ⅰ. 문제 제기
Ⅱ. 근로자 개인정보처리에 관한 개인정보보호법의 적용
Ⅲ. 현 개인정보보호법 외의 개인정보처리 문제
Ⅳ. 이중 불균형의 극복방안
Ⅴ. 결론
참고문헌
〈Abstract〉
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청이 논문과 연관된 판례 (4)
-
대법원 2014. 7. 24. 선고 2012다49933 판결
[1] 인간의 존엄과 가치, 행복추구권을 규정한 헌법 제10조 제1문에서 도출되는 일반적 인격권 및 헌법 제17조의 사생활의 비밀과 자유에 의하여 보장되는 개인정보자기결정권은 자신에 관한 정보가 언제 누구에게 어느 범위까지 알려지고 또 이용되도록 할 것인지를 정보주체가 스스로 결정할 수 있는 권리이다. 개인정보자기결정권의 보호대상이 되는 개인정보는 개인의
자세히 보기 -
서울행정법원 2014. 9. 25. 선고 2013구합61364 판결
자세히 보기 -
대법원 2009. 12. 24. 선고 2007도6243 판결
[1] 형법 제20조의 `사회상규에 위배되지 아니하는 행위`라 함은 법질서 전체의 정신이나 그 배후에 놓여 있는 사회윤리 내지 사회통념에 비추어 용인될 수 있는 행위를 말하고, 어떠한 행위가 사회상규에 위배되지 아니하는 정당한 행위로서 위법성이 조각되는 것인지는 구체적인 사정 아래서 합목적적·합리적으로 고찰하여 개별적으로
자세히 보기 -
헌법재판소 2005. 5. 26. 선고 99헌마513,2004헌마190(병합) 전원재판부
가.이 사건 심판대상조항과 행위 중 본안판단의 대상이 되는 것은 주민등록법시행령 제33조 제2항에 의한 별지 제30호서식 중 열 손가락의 회전지문과 평면지문을 날인하도록 한 부분(이하 `이 사건 시행령조항`이라 한다)과 경찰청장이 청구인들의 주민등록증발급신청서에 날인되어 있는 지문정보를 보관·전산화하고
자세히 보기
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
개인정보 보호법의 적용 범위에 관한 연구
정보법학
2022 .04
-
개인정보 관련 법령의 실무적 운영과정에서 드러난 문제점과 개선방향
사법
2017 .01
-
개정 개인정보 보호법의 민사법적 쟁점
법조
2023 .06
-
EU 적정성 결정에 따른 개인정보보호위원회 고시인 보완규정의 법적 분석
고려법학
2022 .09
-
대만 개인정보보호법의 주요 내용과 함의
동북아법연구
2017 .01
-
기간제법상 단시간 근로자 보호에 대한 재검토
노동법논총
2017 .04
-
수사상 증거수집에 대한 개인정보 보호법의 적용요건
경찰학연구
2023 .12
-
근로관계에서 사용자의 취업시킬 의무와 근로자의 휴식
법학연구
2017 .01
-
근로자 경영참여에 관한 법적 검토
노동법포럼
2016 .11
-
빅데이터 시대 생성정보의 처리 체계 - 추론된 정보의 처리에 관한 우리 개인정보보호법의 규율과 개선 방안에 관한 고찰 -
정보법학
2017 .01
-
언어재활사의 개인정보보호법에 대한 일반적인 인식 현황
한국언어치료학회 학술발표대회 논문집
2022 .11
-
전출과 근로자파견과의 관계
노동법포럼
2022 .07
-
전자수리서비스 업종에서의 불법파견 관련 하급심 판례 재검토 : 서울중앙지법 2017. 1. 12 선고, 2013가합53613 판결을 중심으로
노동법논총
2017 .08
-
사회복지사의 근로형태 분석과 권리보호방안 - 한국과 미국의 비교연구 -
사회복지법제연구
2015 .01
-
디지털 전환시대 플랫폼 노동자의 법적 보호방안
법학연구
2021 .06
-
개인정보 보호법 적용 배제사유에 관한 연구- “통계목적 개인정보처리의 적용제외 관련규정(58조 제1항 제1호)” 정비방안을 중심으로 -
법과 정책연구
2018 .01
-
외국인근로자의 헌법상 근로권보장과 고용허가제의 쟁점사항
한양법학
2015 .11
-
코로나 팬데믹 시대의 외국인근로자의 건강권 보호
한양법학
2021 .11
-
빅데이터 · 사물인터넷 시대 개인정보보호법제의 발전적 전환을 위한 연구
중앙법학
2015 .12
-
정리해고자에 대한 사용자의 재고용의무
산업관계연구
2017 .09
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2019-360-001214848