Are critical size bone notch defects possible in the rabbit mandible?

Patricia L. Carlisle; Teja Guda; David T. Silliman; Robert G. Hale; Pamela R. Brown Baer

추천

검색

자료유형: 학술저널

저자정보: Patricia L. Carlisle Teja Guda David T. Silliman Robert G. Hale Pamela R. Brown Baer

저널정보: 대한구강악안면외과학회 대한구강악안면외과학회지 대한구강악안면외과학회지 제45권 제2호

발행연도: 2019.1

수록면: 97 - 107 (11page)

이용수

📌

연구주제

📖

연구배경

🔬

연구방법

🏆

연구결과

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기

Objectives: Small animal maxillofacial models, such as non-segmental critical size defects (CSDs) in the rabbit mandible, need to be standardized for use as preclinical models of bone regeneration to mimic clinical conditions such as maxillofacial trauma. The objective of this study is the establishment of a mechanically competent CSD model in the rabbit mandible to allow standardized evaluation of bone regeneration therapies. Materials and Methods: Three sizes of bony defect were generated in the mandibular body of rabbit hemi-mandibles: 12 mm×5 mm, 12 mm×8 mm, and 15 mm×10 mm. The hemi-mandibles were tested to failure in 3-point flexure. The 12 mm×5 mm defect was then chosen for the defect size created in the mandibles of 26 rabbits with or without cautery of the defect margins and bone regeneration was assessed after 6 and 12 weeks. Regenerated bone density and volume were evaluated using radiography, micro-computed tomography, and histology. Results: Flexural strength of the 12 mm×5 mm defect was similar to its contralateral; whereas the 12 mm×8 mm and 15 mm×10 mm groups carried significantly less load than their respective contralaterals (P<0.05). This demonstrated that the 12 mm×5 mm defect did not significantly compromise mandibular mechanical integrity. Significantly less (P<0.05) bone was regenerated at 6 weeks in cauterized defect margins compared to controls without cautery. After 12 weeks, the bone volume of the group with cautery increased to that of the control without cautery after 6 weeks. Conclusion: An empty defect size of 12 mm×5 mm in the rabbit mandibular model maintains sufficient mechanical stability to not require additional stabilization. However, this defect size allows for bone regeneration across the defect. Cautery of the defect only delays regeneration by 6 weeks suggesting that the performance of bone graft materials in mandibular defects of this size should be considered with caution.

참고문헌 (50)

참고문헌 신청

Glendor U / 2009 / Aetiology and risk factors related to traumatic dental injuries--a review of the literature / Dent Traumatol 25:19~31

Zachar MR / 2013 / Characterization of mandibular fractures incurred from battle injuries in Iraq and Afghanistan from 2001-2010 / J Oral Maxillofac Surg 71:734~742

Schmitz JP / 1986 / The critical size defect as an experimental model for craniomandibulofacial nonunions / Clin Orthop Relat Res 205:299~308

Cooper GM / 2010 / Testing the critical size in calvarial bone defects : revisiting the concept of a critical-size defect / Plast Reconstr Surg 125:1685~1692

Vajgel A / 2014 / A systematic review on the critical size defect model / Clin Oral Implants Res 25:879~893

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!