지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 저널정보
- The Academy of Korean Studies THE REVIEW OF KOREAN STUDIES THE REVIEW OF KOREAN STUDIES Volume 13 Number 3
- 발행연도
- 2010.9
- 수록면
- 13 - 30 (18page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The Sinocentric dichotomy between civilized people and barbarian people has long been the worldview of East Asians. Although this view was challenged before, the decisive challenge was posed by the changes in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. What was the reason for the irreversible overthrow of traditional Sinocentrism and the adoption of what they had previously considered to be barbarianism?
Qing China’s Kang Youwei (1857-1927), Japan’s Fukuzawa Yukichi (1835-1901), and Joseon Korea’s Yu Giljun (1856-1914) all thought Western civilization to be a more advanced civilization. However, the eventual aims the three men sought were not the same. From revitalization of Confucianism (Kang Youwei), permanent separation from the tradition of Confucianism through “de-Asianization” (Fukuzawa Yukichi), to the pursuit of a modern independent state without abandonment of traditional Confucianism (Yu Giljun), these three representative intellectuals of East Asia display how the traditional mentality formed during the premodern period continued to influence the modern transformation.
The variations and methods of acceptance of the Sinocentric dichotomy of civilized and barbarian played a very important role in the formation of mentalities among the three nations of East Asia.
Psychological responses to the injury created by the impact of the Western civilization were not unrelated to the extant mental attitude displayed by Sinocentrism. While China failed to abandon its narcissism and maintained its faith in its origins, Japan radically abandoned Sinocentrism and assimilated itself to Western culture ? creating its own narcissism vis-a-vis others. Korea appears to have switched the object of assimilation beginning at the point of the Sino-Japanese War. While traditionalism may have persisted at the underlying level, the thrust of modern Korean society could be found in this transformation.
Qing China’s Kang Youwei (1857-1927), Japan’s Fukuzawa Yukichi (1835-1901), and Joseon Korea’s Yu Giljun (1856-1914) all thought Western civilization to be a more advanced civilization. However, the eventual aims the three men sought were not the same. From revitalization of Confucianism (Kang Youwei), permanent separation from the tradition of Confucianism through “de-Asianization” (Fukuzawa Yukichi), to the pursuit of a modern independent state without abandonment of traditional Confucianism (Yu Giljun), these three representative intellectuals of East Asia display how the traditional mentality formed during the premodern period continued to influence the modern transformation.
The variations and methods of acceptance of the Sinocentric dichotomy of civilized and barbarian played a very important role in the formation of mentalities among the three nations of East Asia.
Psychological responses to the injury created by the impact of the Western civilization were not unrelated to the extant mental attitude displayed by Sinocentrism. While China failed to abandon its narcissism and maintained its faith in its origins, Japan radically abandoned Sinocentrism and assimilated itself to Western culture ? creating its own narcissism vis-a-vis others. Korea appears to have switched the object of assimilation beginning at the point of the Sino-Japanese War. While traditionalism may have persisted at the underlying level, the thrust of modern Korean society could be found in this transformation.
목차
Introduction
Variations of the East Asian Civilized-Barbarian Dichotomy
Attitudes toward Acceptance of “Civilization”
Fukuzawa Yukichi, Kang Youwei, Yu Giljun
Conclusion
References
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
후쿠자와 유키치의 儒敎觀과 脫亞論의 사상적 지평
日本思想
2006 .01
-
후쿠자와 유키치 유학비판의 배경과 해석 - 동아시아 유학사 재인식을 위한 출발점 -
역사와현실
2020 .09
-
福沢諭吉의 아시아 인식 : 조선인식을 중심으로
일본연구
2009 .08
-
歷史에서 본 韓日關係와 文明轉換
역사교육
2013 .12
-
‘문명’의 개념과 문명사 연구
역사와 담론
2009 .04
-
‘직분’ 개념으로 보는 유길준의 주권의 원천 Ⲻ 후쿠자와 유키치와의 비교를 통해 Ⲻ
동양철학연구
2020 .01
-
『독립신문』·『매일신문』에 수용된 ‘문명/야만’담론의 의미 층위
국어국문학
2004 .05
-
淸代末期 西洋文化 輸入에 있어서 日本漢譯에 대한 두 갈래 시선-嚴復․康有爲의 保守的인 性向을 중심으로 -
외국학연구
2015 .01
-
동아시아론의 전개와 역사 텍스트 속의 동아시아
역사교육
2007 .06
-
중국 영화 속의 중화주의(中華主義) 양상 고찰-영화 <孔子>를 중심으로
중국학
2013 .01
-
조선중화주의의 재검토 : 이론적 접근
한국사연구
2013 .09
-
조선후기 中華 인식의 지리적 맥락
한국사연구
2012 .09
-
강증산의 ‘개벽’과 새로운 문명
대순사상논총
2019 .01
-
상실과 회귀 : 중국적 ‘뿌리의식’에 대한 일고찰
중국문화연구
2017 .02
-
華夷觀과 조선조 사대부의 對外認識
중어중문학
2012 .04
-
Confucianism in Asia’s Modern Transformation
Korea Journal
1992 .12
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2020-911-000958907