메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국멀티미디어언어교육학회 멀티미디어 언어교육 멀티미디어 언어교육 제22권 제4호
발행연도
2019.1
수록면
103 - 133 (31page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Peer response has been considered as face-threatening acts owing to its nature of requiring assessment on peers’ L2 writing. The proper use of mitigation strategies in peer interaction can serve the role of face-saving acts softening comments from each other. A few studies, however, have investigated mitigation strategies instruction on L2 peer response in the online environments. This study aims to investigate university students’ mitigation strategies in L2 written peer response, types of mitigation strategies in peer response through asynchronous computer-mediated communication (ACMC), and the effects of mitigation strategies instruction on developing students’ L2 writing abilities. The mixed research methods were conducted on 40 university students who enrolled in an English writing course. Students’ writing pre- and post-tests were gathered as quantitative data. Their writing assignments, online recordings of peer response were collected as the qualitative data. The findings are as follows. First, students employed various types of mitigation strategies in written peer response through ACMC, and the most frequently observed strategy was Hedges. Second, mitigation strategies instruction on written peer response through ACMC positively affects the improvement of students’ L2 writing abilities. Exploring the incorporation of either mitigated or unmitigated feedback in L2 writing is suggested for future research.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (48)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0