메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국생물교육학회 생물교육 생물교육 제48권 제2호
발행연도
2020.1
수록면
288 - 307 (20page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This study performed to provide educational implications for revising curriculum by comparing and analyzing US’s Next Generation Science Standards(NGSS) performance expectations and Korea’s 2015 revised science curriculum achievement standards on ecosystem concepts in middle and high school courses. For this, learning contents on ecosystem in 2015 revised science curriculum and NGSS were compared and analyzed, and educational objectives derived from achievement standard and performance expectations were compare and analyzed in terms of Bloom’s revised taxonomy, statement types, and scientific and engineering practices or inquiry skills. As a result, Korea’s 2015 revised science curriculum contained only contents about biodiversity in middle school, in particular, contents about matter circulation and energy flow in organism and ecosystem were not included in high school science. But NGSS dealt with overall contents about ecosystem in both middle and high school in a balanced way. Of knowledge dimension of Bloom’s revised taxonomy, conceptual knowledge accounted for the highest percentage in Korea’s 2015 revised science curriculum and NGSS. On cognitive process dimension, ‘Understand’ was mainly showed in Korea’s 2015 revised science curriculum, but NGSS presented various cognitive process. Korea’s 2015 revised science curriculum had many content-focused and activity-focused statements, but NGSS had numerous performance-focused statements. On scientific and engineering practices or inquiry skills, ‘Collecting, Analyzing and Interpreting Data’ took up the highest percentage in Korea’s 2015 revised science curriculum and ‘Drawing Conclusions and Performing Evaluations’ did so in NGSS.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (40)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0