메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
정세권 (숙명여대)
저널정보
역사비평사 역사비평 역사비평 2020년 겨울호(통권 제133호)
발행연도
2020.11
수록면
350 - 379 (30page)
DOI
10.38080/crh.2020.11.133.350

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This paper aims to demonstrate the complexity of medical practices on epidemic diseases and the relationships with the circumstances outside laboratory, by reviewing the pneumonic plague in Manchuria and the International Plague Conference in 1911. First of all, although bubonic plague had been historically rampant and its pathogen(Yersinia pestis) was identified in 1894, pneumonic form was unfamiliar disease in 1911, not only because it had rarely been seen but because its symptoms were quite different from the bubonic form. Medical experts at the conference, despite their acquaintance with bubonic plague, could not conclusively confirm that pneumonic plague was the same disease as the bubonic form. Secondly, at that time the way to inspect new and perplexing diseases, such as pneumonic plague, was not single and homogenous, and a variety of medical practices from traditional patho-anatomic observations to laboratory techniques, for example, bacteriological and histological analyses and animal experiments, had to be involved. While these diverse practices served to aid in the understanding of pneumonic plague to some extent, they were judged by different standards and became the central issue of debate at the conference. Thirdly, Manchuria offered an unstable stage for scientific investigations. Medical examinations of representatives concerning pneumonic plague had been influenced by the political position of powers in Manchuria. Therefore, the conference which aimed to understand and overcome unfamiliar epidemic, had failed to draw an unanimous conclusions. This paper, reviewing the case of Manchuria in 1911, would contribute to understand the complexity of medical practices on COVID19 and its relationships with diverse circumstances outside laboratory.

목차

1. 들어가며
2. 반(半)식민지 만주의 정치학과 국제페스트컨퍼런스
3. 익숙하지만 모호한 전염병, 폐페스트란?
4. 더 좋은 백신을 선택하는 기준은?
5. 나가며
참고문헌

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2021-905-000077589