메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
이기천 (서강대학교)
저널정보
국방부 군사편찬연구소 군사 군사 제117호
발행연도
2020.12
수록면
129 - 172 (44page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The research in the history of Tang dynasty’s military system in Japanese academia has been conducted by ‘the experience of war’ as the time axis and ‘schools of thought’ as the space axis. The early scholars who experienced the war were cognizant of the fact that military system was not the matter of right and wrong but the experience of survival.
It originated from the experience of war why scholars of the war generation, such as Hino Kaisaburo who suffered from a spine fracture produced by torpedo attacks, Kurihara Masuo who lost all but one comrade in the war, and Tanigawa Michio who was conscripted into the army as he matriculated at university on the verge of defeat in the war, and scholars of the post-war generation had different perspectives on the military system.
Hamaguchi Shigekuni focused on the matter of the biggest anguish of people, namely military service, and Kurihara Masuo compared military provinces in the late Tang to Japan’s warlords in the 1930s by a common denominator ‘mutiny’, and sought an inevitable principle in history which is ‘Restrain Military provinces, Encourage the Cabinet.’ The motive behind their researches also came from the experience of war.
Scholars of the war generation were divided into two camps, Tokyo university and Kyoto university. They heavily debated the utility of the conscription system and the burden of military service. On the contrary, scholars of the post-war generation did not have scholarly debates between schools, but rather had a tendency to conduct individual research focusing on specific cases. They tended to focus on excavation of new historical sources and individual research, but have not yet presented ‘the zeitgeist of Tang dynasty.’

목차

1. 머리말
2. 府兵制, 藩鎭 연구의 개척과 논점
3. 戰後 군제사 논쟁의 계보
4. 戰後世代의 군제사 연구의 특징
5. 맺음말
참고문헌
Abstract

참고문헌 (118)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2021-390-001410054