지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 저널정보
- 중국어문학연구회 중국어문학논집 中國語文學論集 第130號
- 발행연도
- 2021.10
- 수록면
- 71 - 94 (24page)
- DOI
- 10.25021/JCLL.2021.10.130.71
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This research focuses on semantic and syntactic properties of pre-Qin double negators by categorizing negators that combine with the negator ‘非’ which emerged in the pre-Qin period. Scholastic views regarding such double negation vary in syntactical aspect, and they also vary regarding functions and meanings of the double negatory structure categories. Thus this research surveys semantic and syntactic aspects of pre-Qin double negations, on the basis of double negatory forms found in model pre-Qin literatures: Analects, Zuo zhuan, Mencius, Guoyu, Han Feizi. This research also surveys how the Ancient Chinese negator ‘非’ was differentiated and vested as Modern Chinese ‘不’ ‘沒’.
1. This research categorizes and analyzes double negation types of the pre-Qin period based upon the exemplified model literatures of the time. Every types of negators that combine with the negator ‘非’ are to be categorized and analyzed. The analyzed statistic will serve to examine functions and meanings of the pre-Qin negator ‘非’ in sentence structures.
According to the that, the negators in Analects, Zuo zhuan, Mencius, Guoyu, Han Feizi are once again sorted as ‘幫母’ and ‘明母’ which are the pre-Qin categories of initials; negators that belong to the ‘幫母’ are vested as ‘p-negators’ and those belonging to the ‘明母’ as ‘m-negators’, and each categories are to be surveyed on the basis of sentence structure.
2. Negators that combine in front of the negator ‘非’ are only attested as ‘不, 非’ (p-negators) and ‘無, 莫, 未’ (m-negators). The form [Negator-1 +非] may seem as [+ double negation] but it is the negator ‘非’ that has [- negation] feature in the form [Negator-1 +非]. The forms [無+非] and [莫+非] are both double negatory sentences ([+double negation] forms) with meanings of [+strong affirmation]. Thus the ‘p-negator’ in front of the negator ‘非’ is [-double negation].
3. The negators preceded by the negator ‘非’ are as follows: ‘不, 弗, 非’ as the p-negators, and the ‘無, 莫, 勿, 亡’ as the m-negators. The form [非+negator-2] makes accordance with structure and meaning of double negatory sentence, but the forms [非+X+negator-2] and [非+XY+negator-2] are shown diversely as [+double negation], [+conditional negation], [+prohibitory negation].
4. The double negatory forms may be explained as meanings of ‘不是’, ‘沒有’ or ‘不要’ in Modern Chinese. The negator ‘非’ functions as [+ negatory verb]. It tells us that the negators that combine with ‘非’ are ‘不, 非, 無’. Such negator is very basic negator with unmarkedness.
5. The double negation forms found in the colloquial Modern Chinese are ‘非... 不可’, ‘非... 非’ and ‘不... 非’. There is no pattern ‘非... 不可’ found in pre-Qin literatures, but ‘非... 非’ is attested once each in Zuo Zhuan and Book of Han. Therefore the double negatory forms in Modern Chinese cannot be regarded as double negatory sentences, considering that they have already occured in pre-Qin period but have [-strong affirmation] feature semantically.
1. This research categorizes and analyzes double negation types of the pre-Qin period based upon the exemplified model literatures of the time. Every types of negators that combine with the negator ‘非’ are to be categorized and analyzed. The analyzed statistic will serve to examine functions and meanings of the pre-Qin negator ‘非’ in sentence structures.
According to the that, the negators in Analects, Zuo zhuan, Mencius, Guoyu, Han Feizi are once again sorted as ‘幫母’ and ‘明母’ which are the pre-Qin categories of initials; negators that belong to the ‘幫母’ are vested as ‘p-negators’ and those belonging to the ‘明母’ as ‘m-negators’, and each categories are to be surveyed on the basis of sentence structure.
2. Negators that combine in front of the negator ‘非’ are only attested as ‘不, 非’ (p-negators) and ‘無, 莫, 未’ (m-negators). The form [Negator-1 +非] may seem as [+ double negation] but it is the negator ‘非’ that has [- negation] feature in the form [Negator-1 +非]. The forms [無+非] and [莫+非] are both double negatory sentences ([+double negation] forms) with meanings of [+strong affirmation]. Thus the ‘p-negator’ in front of the negator ‘非’ is [-double negation].
3. The negators preceded by the negator ‘非’ are as follows: ‘不, 弗, 非’ as the p-negators, and the ‘無, 莫, 勿, 亡’ as the m-negators. The form [非+negator-2] makes accordance with structure and meaning of double negatory sentence, but the forms [非+X+negator-2] and [非+XY+negator-2] are shown diversely as [+double negation], [+conditional negation], [+prohibitory negation].
4. The double negatory forms may be explained as meanings of ‘不是’, ‘沒有’ or ‘不要’ in Modern Chinese. The negator ‘非’ functions as [+ negatory verb]. It tells us that the negators that combine with ‘非’ are ‘不, 非, 無’. Such negator is very basic negator with unmarkedness.
5. The double negation forms found in the colloquial Modern Chinese are ‘非... 不可’, ‘非... 非’ and ‘不... 非’. There is no pattern ‘非... 不可’ found in pre-Qin literatures, but ‘非... 非’ is attested once each in Zuo Zhuan and Book of Han. Therefore the double negatory forms in Modern Chinese cannot be regarded as double negatory sentences, considering that they have already occured in pre-Qin period but have [-strong affirmation] feature semantically.
목차
1. 서론
2. ‘Neg¹+非’의 통사적 특징
3. ‘非+Neg²’ 의 통사적 특징
4. 결론
參考文獻
ABSTRACT
참고문헌 (20)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
구문문법을 통해 본 ‘非X不可’의 의미 분류 및 화용조건 분석
중국어문학논집
2021 .02
-
慶州 李中久家 五代 古文書 資料의 정리와 성과
동양학
2021 .01
-
비
숙명문학
2022 .11
-
비 오는 밤
시조시학
2016 .08
-
뤼시앵 페브르, 김중현 역, 『마르틴 루터, 한 인간의 운명』(이른비, 2016)
서양사론
2017 .01
-
"자기"와 "自己"의 조한 대조연구
중국조선어문
2016 .01
-
对现代汉语‘A一点儿+V’与‘V+A一点儿’祈使句的对比研究
한국중어중문학회 학술대회 자료집
2017 .11
-
日本語学習者の対日イメ-ジと日本語学習動機づけ : 韓国における男女大学生の比較
대한일어일문학회 학술대회 발표논문 요지집
2018 .04
-
비를 기다리며
수필미학
2021 .03
-
비
수필미학
2023 .12
-
비가 봄을 만나다
수필미학
2015 .12
-
꽃 비 외 4편
시조시학
2016 .03
-
비 오는 날 외 1편
시조시학
2016 .12
-
비 오는 날
창비어린이
2018 .03
-
눈 비 뒤섞이는 말
숙명문학
2020 .11
-
중한 사회문화분야신조어의 대비연구
중국조선어문
2016 .05
-
김억의 한시번역 연구
중국조선어문
2017 .03
-
4ㆍ16 이후, 지식이란 무엇인가? : 『세월호 이후의 사회과학』(그린비, 2016)
문화과학
2016 .06
-
中国的中韩对比研究现状和特征
한국학연구
2017 .09
-
学習者の提出課題を活用したオンライン授業 - 日本語寮の中․上級者クラスの実践報告 -
일본어문학
2021 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2021-820-002169075