메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
이정민 (성균관대학교)
저널정보
수선사학회 사림 사림 제55호
발행연도
2016.1
수록면
403 - 426 (24page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
When the East-Berlin Case began in 1967, Many people especially West-Germans sent many petitions to Ministry of Foreign Affairs and the presidents of West Germany and South Korea. Most of petition senders were relatives or colleagues of the suspects of the case. And many intellectuals in West Germany also sent petitions. South Korean government approached to the case in the perspective of anti-communism. West German government concentrated to the ‘truth’ of the case, but they tried to solve the problem only in the diplomatic relations to South Korea. But petition senders paid attention to the ‘people’. In other words they thought that the suspects were accused as the spies of North Korea although they were not. And petition senders saw how suspects’ families were suffering because of the case. They were free from ‘the diplomatic relations’ than their government, so they could insist more radically than their government. Petition senders had less informations than their government, so there were some invalid inferences and wrong informations in the petitions. Appeal concentrating to the ‘people’ was the best way they can, because they had no legal capacity to do something for the suspects. And in many times West Germany government were aware of the West German public while progressing negotiations with South Korean government. So the petitions became the basis of the solution of the case.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0