Review of Cortical Bone Trajectory: Evidence of a New Technique

Juan Delgado-Fernandez; Maria Ángeles García-Pallero; Guillermo Blasco; Paloma Pulido-Rivas; Rafael; G. Sola

추천

검색

자료유형: 학술저널

저자정보: Juan Delgado-Fernandez (University Hospital La Princesa) Maria Ángeles García-Pallero (University Hospital La Princesa) Guillermo Blasco (University Hospital La Princesa) Paloma Pulido-Rivas (University Hospital La Princesa) Rafael (University Hospital La Princesa) G. Sola (University Hospital La Princesa)

저널정보: 대한척추외과학회 Asian Spine Journal Asian Spine Journal Vol.11 No.5

발행연도: 2017.1

수록면: 817 - 831 (15page)

이용수

📌

연구주제

📖

연구배경

🔬

연구방법

🏆

연구결과

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기

This article summarizes recent evidence on the cortical bone trajectory (CBT) obtained from published anatomical, biomechanical, and clinical studies. CBT was proposed by Santoni in 2009 as a new trajectory that can improve the fixation of pedicle screws in response to screw loosening in osteoporotic patients. Recently, research interest has been growing with increasing numbers of published series and frequent reports of new applications. We performed an online database search using the terms “cortical bone trajectory,” “pedicle screw,” “CBT spine,” “CBT fixation,” “MISS CBT,” and “traditional trajectory.” The search included the PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE, Cochrane, and Google Scholar databases, resulting in an analysis of 42 articles in total. These covered three aspects of CBT research: anatomical studies, biomechanical parameters, and clinical cases or series. Compared to the traditional trajectory, CBT improves pullout strength, provides greater stiffness in cephalocaudal and mediolateral loading, and shows superior resistance to flexion/extension; however, it is inferior in lateral bending and axial rotation. CBT seems to provide better immediate implant stability. In clinical studies, CBT has shown better perioperative results for blood loss, length of stay in hospital, and surgery time; similar or better clinical postoperative scores; and similar comorbidity, without any major fixation system complications due to instrumentation failure or screw misplacement. In addition, advantages such as less lateral exposure allow it to be used as a minimally invasive technique. However, most of the clinical studies were retrospective case series or case-control studies; prospective evidence on this technique is scarce, making a definitive comparison with the traditional trajectory difficult. Nevertheless, we can conclude that CBT is a safe technique that offers good clinical results with similar biomechanical and perioperative parameters to those of the traditional trajectory. In addition, new applications can improve its results and make it useful for additional pathologies.

참고문헌 (3)

참고문헌 신청

Koshi Ninomiya / 2015 / Clear Zone Formation around Screws in the Early Postoperative Stages after Posterior Lumbar Fusion Using the Cortical Bone Trajectory Technique / Asian Spine Journal 9(6):884~888

Koshi Ninomiya / 2016 / Radiological Evaluation of the Initial Fixation between Cortical Bone Trajectory and Conventional Pedicle Screw Technique for Lumbar Degenerative Spondylolisthesis / Asian Spine Journal 10(2):251~257

Kanji Mori / 2016 / Short-Term Clinical Result of Cortical Bone Trajectory Technique for the Treatment of Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis with More than 1-Year Follow-Up / Asian Spine Journal 10(2):238~244

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!