지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This article will try to show the major nuclear plant accidents such as the Three Mile Island[TMI] accident in the US, and the Chernobyl accident in the Soviet Union. It will focus not on their causes and processes but on the effects on the public opinion and the nuclear power regimes among the UK, France, West Germany, and the US. It will investigate on how the public opinion had formulated, and how the nuclear power regimes had responded to these accidents among these 4 countries in a comparative history. It will show the diverse responses of each state’s nuclear power regime from the post-nuclear plant policy to the reinforcement of the existing nuclear plant policy, even though these nuclear plant accidents had affected enormously on their societies. The TMI accident in 1979 was perceived as a great shock to most Americans. Despite its scale was so disastrous that the anti-nuclear movement had risen nationwide, the American nuclear power regime did not give up the pro-nuclear plant policy. Furthermore, its impacts on the European countries including the UK, France, and West Germany were relatively not so strong, although these countries took steps in enforcing the safety problems of the nuclear plants. However, the Chernobyl accident case in 1986 was different to the European states because it was the worst nuclear plant accident and they were interconnected as a whole, no countries escaped from the radioactive fallout. Despite of this fact, the responses of each states were so different. As a result, while the UK had to accept to the people’s voices asking for the reexamination of safety on the nuclear plants, the US had still continued the nuclear power regime in the federal level, while some state governments – New York, New Hampshire, and Massachusetts – raised doubts about the operations of nuclear plants. More dramatic contrast happened between West Germany and France. While West Germany finally decided to build no more nuclear plant for a post-nuclear society, France opened most information on the nuclear plants and had got a support from the majority of French people. Through implementing a policy of “embrace and extend” against the anti-nuclear power, the French government had succeeded in making its nuclear power regime more positively.
목차
등록된 정보가 없습니다.
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
기후 위기의 대응방안으로써 원자력 발전(發電): 러시아와 프랑스의 원전산업 발전과 협력을 중심으로
동유럽발칸연구
2022 .05
-
사회기술적 조정과 원전 체제의 다양성: 원전 산업구조와 규제양식을 중심으로
서양사연구
2016 .01
-
원전 체제의 형성, 1940 ~ 1970 - 미·영·프·독의 경우를 중심으로 -
서양사연구
2016 .01
-
일본 후쿠시마 원전사고 이후 원자력정책 변화 한일 비교
일본문화학보
2015 .02
-
체르노빌 원전사고에 대한 프랑스의 반응: 1986-1995
역사학연구
2018 .08
-
중국의 핵무기 개발과 1960년대 핵 억제전략
군사연구
2019 .01
-
A Social Dilemma of the Nuclear Energy Issue in South Korea: How Social Value Orientation and Trust in Nuclear Energy Control Affect Individuals’ Behavioral Intentions
Korea Observer
2021 .01
-
Left-wing Origins of the ‘Nuclear Power State’ and the Emergence of the ‘the only country ravaged by the atomic bombs’ Discourses
일본학보
2022 .08
-
The Influence of Social Trust on Public’s Trust in Nuclear-related Parties, Benefit and Risk Perceptions, and Acceptance of Nuclear Energy
Korea Observer
2018 .12
-
원전의 윤리적 운용은 가능한가?
철학논총
2015 .07
-
후쿠시마 원전 사고와 에너지정책의 전환
외국학연구
2018 .01
-
Some Notes on Nuclear Stress in English
언어과학
2017 .01
-
한국과 일본의 원자력발전의 안전문화 비교― 후쿠시마 원전 사고 이후를 중심으로 ―
일본학보
2018 .01
-
1950~1970년대 미국의 전략변화에 따른 한국의 원자력 선택과 자립화
江原史學
2020 .01
-
The Ethics and Politics of North Korea’s Denuclearization
윤리연구
2017 .01
-
일본의 원자력발전소가 입지지역에 미치는 영향 - 후쿠이현 미하마쵸를 중심으로 -
일본어문학
2019 .01
-
일본 내각총리대신의 원자력담론(1947-1974): 발전주의의 접합과 안전신화의 형성
담론201
2021 .10
-
경수로 기술 발달의 역사적 전개 - 영국, 미국, 프랑스, 독일에서의 발달을 중심으로-
서양사연구
2016 .01
-
사용후 핵연료 재처리 정책의 변화와 그 요인들
서양사연구
2016 .01
-
A Human Security Perspective of South Korea's Civil Nuclear Power
Korea Observer
2017 .03
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0