메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
이기욱 (호원대학교)
저널정보
한양법학회 한양법학 한양법학 제33권 제2집(통권 제78집)
발행연도
2022.5
수록면
123 - 160 (38page)
DOI
10.35227/HYLR.2022.5.33.2.123

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
In the U.S. corporate law, the legal nature of shares is limited, and the legal nature of shares is often the concept of property in precedent and theory. In addition, the U.S. corporate law still maintains a legal system affiliated with the common law, and many of the legal concepts for stocks are inherited by the British corporate law. But what they mean is not all that clear.
Therefore, this article attempts to approach the central concept of stocks discussed in the United States through the analysis of precedents. Specifically, the concept of property, which is the premise of discussing the legal nature of stocks, is outlined, and then the discussion on the concept of intangible movable property, which is a representative concept of the legal nature of stocks, is summarized. As a clue to the review of specific legal problems arising from the legal nature of stocks, it is pointed out that the possibility of transfer may exist at the basis of the legal nature of modern stocks along with inherent rights, and that actual corporate behavior presents a modern task to urge a review of the existing stock essence.
Stocks were initially recognized as representing ownership of material fluids, which are objects of investment made by shareholders through the company or investment made by the company itself. According to the legal concept, the understanding of the nature of stocks was converted from ‘property’ to intangible or human property and into intangible real estate. The substance was the abstraction and generalization of the concept of ownership. At the same time, it was the acquisition of the possibility of transfer due to a phased departure from the restrictions on the possibility of transfer in real estate. More essentially, it was a conscious and unconscious re-confirmation of the inherent rights of shareholders, which the concept of ‘property’ originally possessed. What made it possible is that the concept of ‘property’ itself achieved abstraction and generalization. Although capitalist economic relations were completed by this change of concept, ‘property’ below it means ‘control over gains by expectations that can be traded in the future’, and the freedom acquired by stocks is tantamount to freedom of transaction in the market. The abstraction of the stock concept supported this. In other words, it can be seen that the possibility of transfer exists at the root of the legal nature of modern stocks along with inherent rights. In response to the demand for transferability, the abstraction and bondization of stocks proceeded. It is thought that the discussion on the acceptance of class stocks or the attendance of shareholders at the general shareholders" meeting can be grasped as a elasticity of stock package in the process of responding to new demands in corporate behavior.

목차

Ⅰ. 서언
Ⅱ. 주식은 프라퍼티인가?
Ⅲ. 인적재산으로서의 주식
Ⅳ. 주식의 법적 성질에서 발생하는 법적 문제
Ⅴ. 결어
참고문헌
Abstract

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0