지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2022.5
- 수록면
- 123 - 160 (38page)
- DOI
- 10.35227/HYLR.2022.5.33.2.123
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
In the U.S. corporate law, the legal nature of shares is limited, and the legal nature of shares is often the concept of property in precedent and theory. In addition, the U.S. corporate law still maintains a legal system affiliated with the common law, and many of the legal concepts for stocks are inherited by the British corporate law. But what they mean is not all that clear.
Therefore, this article attempts to approach the central concept of stocks discussed in the United States through the analysis of precedents. Specifically, the concept of property, which is the premise of discussing the legal nature of stocks, is outlined, and then the discussion on the concept of intangible movable property, which is a representative concept of the legal nature of stocks, is summarized. As a clue to the review of specific legal problems arising from the legal nature of stocks, it is pointed out that the possibility of transfer may exist at the basis of the legal nature of modern stocks along with inherent rights, and that actual corporate behavior presents a modern task to urge a review of the existing stock essence.
Stocks were initially recognized as representing ownership of material fluids, which are objects of investment made by shareholders through the company or investment made by the company itself. According to the legal concept, the understanding of the nature of stocks was converted from ‘property’ to intangible or human property and into intangible real estate. The substance was the abstraction and generalization of the concept of ownership. At the same time, it was the acquisition of the possibility of transfer due to a phased departure from the restrictions on the possibility of transfer in real estate. More essentially, it was a conscious and unconscious re-confirmation of the inherent rights of shareholders, which the concept of ‘property’ originally possessed. What made it possible is that the concept of ‘property’ itself achieved abstraction and generalization. Although capitalist economic relations were completed by this change of concept, ‘property’ below it means ‘control over gains by expectations that can be traded in the future’, and the freedom acquired by stocks is tantamount to freedom of transaction in the market. The abstraction of the stock concept supported this. In other words, it can be seen that the possibility of transfer exists at the root of the legal nature of modern stocks along with inherent rights. In response to the demand for transferability, the abstraction and bondization of stocks proceeded. It is thought that the discussion on the acceptance of class stocks or the attendance of shareholders at the general shareholders" meeting can be grasped as a elasticity of stock package in the process of responding to new demands in corporate behavior.
Therefore, this article attempts to approach the central concept of stocks discussed in the United States through the analysis of precedents. Specifically, the concept of property, which is the premise of discussing the legal nature of stocks, is outlined, and then the discussion on the concept of intangible movable property, which is a representative concept of the legal nature of stocks, is summarized. As a clue to the review of specific legal problems arising from the legal nature of stocks, it is pointed out that the possibility of transfer may exist at the basis of the legal nature of modern stocks along with inherent rights, and that actual corporate behavior presents a modern task to urge a review of the existing stock essence.
Stocks were initially recognized as representing ownership of material fluids, which are objects of investment made by shareholders through the company or investment made by the company itself. According to the legal concept, the understanding of the nature of stocks was converted from ‘property’ to intangible or human property and into intangible real estate. The substance was the abstraction and generalization of the concept of ownership. At the same time, it was the acquisition of the possibility of transfer due to a phased departure from the restrictions on the possibility of transfer in real estate. More essentially, it was a conscious and unconscious re-confirmation of the inherent rights of shareholders, which the concept of ‘property’ originally possessed. What made it possible is that the concept of ‘property’ itself achieved abstraction and generalization. Although capitalist economic relations were completed by this change of concept, ‘property’ below it means ‘control over gains by expectations that can be traded in the future’, and the freedom acquired by stocks is tantamount to freedom of transaction in the market. The abstraction of the stock concept supported this. In other words, it can be seen that the possibility of transfer exists at the root of the legal nature of modern stocks along with inherent rights. In response to the demand for transferability, the abstraction and bondization of stocks proceeded. It is thought that the discussion on the acceptance of class stocks or the attendance of shareholders at the general shareholders" meeting can be grasped as a elasticity of stock package in the process of responding to new demands in corporate behavior.
목차
Ⅰ. 서언
Ⅱ. 주식은 프라퍼티인가?
Ⅲ. 인적재산으로서의 주식
Ⅳ. 주식의 법적 성질에서 발생하는 법적 문제
Ⅴ. 결어
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
주식 투자 만족도 형성 요인에 관한 연구 : 주식 메시지 프레이밍에 대한 조절효과를 중심으로
벤처혁신연구
2018 .12
-
무상증자, 액면분할, 주식배당: 주가와 거래량 효과
한국증권학회지
2018 .02
-
위법한 주식 소각으로 인한 이사의 손해배상책임에 관하여 주주대표소송을 제기할 경우 나타나는 쟁점에 대한 고찰 - 대법원 2021. 7. 15. 선고 2018다298744에 나타난 쟁점을 중심으로 -
법학연구
2022 .12
-
한국과 아세안 국가간 주식시장 동조화 현상에 관한 연구
무역연구
2018 .01
-
주식시장국면 예측과 투자전략에 대한 연구
아태비즈니스연구
2022 .12
-
주식분할 공시에 대한 장 ‧ 단기 효과: 결정요인 분석을 중심으로
아태비즈니스연구
2023 .03
-
우선주가격 및 수익률 결정요인에 관한 연구
아태비즈니스연구
2020 .01
-
상법상 자기주식의 보유와 처분에 관한 입법론: 자기주식의 본질에 기초하여
상사판례연구
2024 .03
-
중화권 주식시장의 정보전이효과에 관한 연구 : 중국 주식시장 지분분할개혁 전후를 중심으로
산업경제연구
2015 .04
-
A Multivariate GARCH Analysis on International Stock Market Integration : Korean Market Case
Management Science and Financial Engineering
2015 .05
-
상장주식 양도차익 과세에 대한 문제점 - 대주주 판단 기준을 중심으로 -
법학논집
2020 .01
-
Option volume and stock returns: evidence from single stock options on the Korea Exchange
선물연구
2021 .12
-
A Study on the Structural Change of Asian Stock Market after Global Financial Crisis
질서경제저널
2022 .06
-
주식매수청구권 행사의 매수가격의 공정성에 관한 연구 - 소수파주주 권리강화론을 중심으로 -
외법논집
2021 .01
-
상법‧자본시장법 및 조세법상 주식평가방법의 정합성 제고에 관한 시론적 연구
한양법학
2023 .02
-
블록체인을 이용한 주식거래의 가능성과 회사법상 쟁점
기업법연구
2018 .06
-
주주의 주식 보유목적에 대한 해석·공시방안에 관한 연구 -한진칼 사건 및 삼성물산 사건을 중심으로-
성균관법학
2022 .06
-
상법상 주식 양도담보의 법리에 관한 고찰
한양법학
2015 .08
-
미국 회사법상 주주의 의결권
법과 정책연구
2024 .06
-
정관상 주식양도제한과 비상장주식의 매수가격 결정- 대법원 2022. 7. 28. 자 2020마5054 결정 -
상사판례연구
2022 .09
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0