메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
Hwang, Jung-Suk (Sungkyunkwan University)
저널정보
한국현대영미드라마학회 현대영미드라마 현대영미드라마 제35권 제1호
발행연도
2022.4
수록면
137 - 157 (21page)
DOI
10.29163/jmed.2022.4.35.1.137

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Samuel Beckett’s Endgame (1957) was originally published and performed in French, entitled Fin de Partie, and translated to English by Beckett himself. It is a one-act play with four characters: Hamm, Clov, Nagg, and Nell confined to a shelter, where there is nothing to eat except the last few biscuits in the cupboard in the off-stage kitchen. “Endgame” is a term in chess that refers to the final stages of the game where only a few pieces remain on the board, and Beckett himself stated that he entitled his play “Endgame as in chess” and Hamm is like a king who desperately delays the end. Naturally, the analogy of the play with chess has dominated the reading of the play. Identifying Hamm as king, Clov as knight or pawn, and Negg and Nell as either rooks or pawns, many critics have examined metaphors of chess or a game in the play. Focusing on the link between Endgame and chess game, the current readings, however, have overlooked how Beckett breaks the rules of a game in the play. Applying Johan Huizinga’s theory of the game, I reveal the neglected aspect, re-examine the play’s characteristics of the Theater of the Absurd concerning game theory, and examine what outcomes Beckett intends. I further examine what underlies Beckett’s legal scuffles with directors and theater companies that staged his play.

목차

I. Introduction
II. Game and Endgame
III. Conclusion
Works Cited
Abstract

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2022-842-001331666