지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2022.8
- 수록면
- 69 - 110 (42page)
- DOI
- 10.38080/crh.2022.08.140.69
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The deepening of inequality has made fairness and competence a hot topic instead of equality. Meritocracy appears in various forms under certain historical conditions. The effects and roles are bound to be different depending on the situation. Nevertheless, if the thickness of the time of meritocracy is measured, it is the largest in modern capitalism or capitalist modernity. The market for freedom, equality, and infinite competition created by the capitalist modern era is the best condition for meritocracy to flourish.
Meritocracy is not simply limited to abstract ideology. It is a value, a custom, and a series of institutional practices. In other words, meritocracy is systematically structured through education and operates as a principle of corporate management, and it spreads to the dominant value system and common sense through the public debate and permeates into everyday customs. Despite the categorical order of free and equal human beings, the social reproduction process naturally internalizes the hierarchy by ability.
The 1960s and 1970s are often referred to as the political and economic origins of modern Korea. This indicates that the width and depth of the change caused by capitalist industrialization were large. If the sense of material goods, equality and inequality, and ability that we are experiencing today is historically composed, it is clear that it cannot be irrelevant to the history of Korean capitalism. The task of asking what meritocracy developed in this era, commonly referred to as the “development era” is the key to understanding contemporary Korean society.
Meritocracy is not simply limited to abstract ideology. It is a value, a custom, and a series of institutional practices. In other words, meritocracy is systematically structured through education and operates as a principle of corporate management, and it spreads to the dominant value system and common sense through the public debate and permeates into everyday customs. Despite the categorical order of free and equal human beings, the social reproduction process naturally internalizes the hierarchy by ability.
The 1960s and 1970s are often referred to as the political and economic origins of modern Korea. This indicates that the width and depth of the change caused by capitalist industrialization were large. If the sense of material goods, equality and inequality, and ability that we are experiencing today is historically composed, it is clear that it cannot be irrelevant to the history of Korean capitalism. The task of asking what meritocracy developed in this era, commonly referred to as the “development era” is the key to understanding contemporary Korean society.
목차
1. 머리말
2. 능력주의의 사회적 확산
3. 지능과 능력
4. 공론장의 능력주의와 비판 담론
5. 맺음말
참고문헌
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
능력주의, 말과 담론이 걸은 역설의 길을 벗어나기
역사비평
2022 .08
-
How East Meets West: Justice and Consequences in Confucian Meritocracy
Journal of Confucian Philosophy and Culture
2022 .02
-
Political Meritocracy for Responsibility
Journal of Confucian Philosophy and Culture
2024 .08
-
Merit and Inequality: Confucian and Communitarian Perspectives on Singapore’s Meritocracy
Journal of Confucian Philosophy and Culture
2024 .02
-
기독교 사회윤리 관점에서 바라본 능력중심사회의 모순
대학과 선교
2023 .06
-
The meritocracy belief and the role of self-compassion among South Korean young generation
인문사회과학연구
2022 .02
-
메리토크라시와 민주주의: 유교적 근대성의 맥락에서
철학연구
2017 .12
-
‘능력주의’사회에 대한 기독교사회윤리적 제언-포도원 주인이 능력주의를 대처하는 법
기독교사회윤리
2022 .12
-
능력주의의 함정 - 능력주의의 본질과 폐해에 관한 비판적 고찰
열린정신 인문학연구
2022 .05
-
Meritocracy as an Ideology for Neoliberalism: A Korean Case
Journal of Confucian Philosophy and Culture
2024 .02
-
Confucianism and Meritocracy in the East Asian Context: Historical, Social, and Political (I)
Journal of Confucian Philosophy and Culture
2024 .02
-
능력주의로 인한 불평등과 양극화의 윤리적 문제
장신논단
2022 .09
-
능력주의 문화에 대한 기독교교육적 대안 -그리스도의 성육신을 중심으로-
신앙과 학문
2022 .03
-
능력주의에 대한 비판 서사로서 이언 맥큐언의 『토요일』 읽기
현대영미소설
2021 .09
-
Confucian Meritocracy and Tongdong Bai’s Against Political Equality
Journal of Confucian Philosophy and Culture
2022 .02
-
The Intellectual Activities and Political Tasks of Eighteenth-Century Joseon Korea: A Comparison Between Confucian Politics in Joseon and Contemporary Meritocracy
Journal of Confucian Philosophy and Culture
2024 .08
-
능력에서 연대로-〈오징어게임〉을 기독교윤리적으로 바라보기
기독교사회윤리
2022 .08
-
In Defense of Political Equality: On Bai Tongdong’s Against Political Equality
Journal of Confucian Philosophy and Culture
2022 .02
-
대니얼 벨의 정치적 능력주의에 대한 비판적 고찰
사회와 철학
2021 .04
-
능력주의의 외부와 틈새 - 법과 메티스
역사비평
2023 .05
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2022-905-001699361