메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
홍대화 (경남대학교)
저널정보
한국러시아문학회 러시아어문학연구논집 러시아어문학연구논집 제77호
발행연도
2022.5
수록면
95 - 122 (28page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Aside from his firm stance as an artist on the role of absurd and ugly daily life and the role of superficial and detailed depictions of humans, the narrator is wary of coming up with his own final interpretations and explanations of characters and subjects. The narrator takes a pose of constantly passing the share of the final interpretation to the reader. As for art, he only vaguely expresses what kind of human figure he will draw in the future as a different dimension of nobility, and does not say what it looks like. He only suggests that the basis for Chichikov's change is a different level of desire granted by heaven, and does not define the details of that desire. The narrator does not have a firm answer and definition on Rus's way forward. This is due to the "incomplete" of the work that depicts Russia on the "road", but it contains a stagnant appearance, not a change, and the work is not completed because the path is not completed. Rus’, who is captured as a whole through generalizations, is galloping somewhere, but she is stuck in a vagueness where the narrator doesn't even know where she's going. The narrator refers to a new level of spiritual growth, a new level of integrity, a new level of Rus’s growth, and a new level of art, suggesting that it is quite related to religious concepts. And the uncertainty, ambiguity, and immersion in the writing process itself encompasses and foreshadows the cessation of Gogol's future writing.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0