지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2022.10
- 수록면
- 712 - 722 (11page)
- DOI
- 10.31616/asj.2021.0264
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Study Design: Retrospective cohort study.Purpose: To compare clinical and radiographic outcomes among minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF), extreme lateral lumbar interbody fusion (XLIF), and oblique lateral lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF) techniques.Overview of Literature: To date, there are many reports comparing outcomes between MIS-TLIF and XLIF, MIS-TLIF and OLIF, or XLIF and OLIF procedures. However, there are no previous studies comparing clinical and radiographic outcomes among all these three techniques.Methods: Data from patients who underwent minimally invasive (MI) fusion surgery for lumbar degenerative diseases at L4–L5 level was analyzed. Thirty patients each from MIS-TLIF, XLIF, and OLIF groups were recruited for propensity score matching. Visual Analog Scale (VAS) of the back and legs and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) were evaluated preoperatively and at 1, 3, and 6 months and 1 year postoperatively. Radiographic outcomes were also compared. The fusion rate was evaluated at 1 year after surgeries.Results: The clinical outcomes were significantly improved in all groups. The disk height was significantly restored in all groups postoperatively, which was significantly more improved in XLIF and OLIF than MIS-TLIF group (<i>p</i><0.001). The axial canal area was significantly increased more in MIS-TLIF versus XLIF and OLIF (<i>p</i><0.001). The correction of lumbar lordotic angle and segmental sagittal angle were similar among these techniques. OLIF and XLIF groups showed less blood loss and shorter hospital stays than MIS-TLIF group (<i>p</i><0.001). There was no significant difference in fusion rate among all groups.Conclusions: MIS-TLIF, XLIF, and OLIF facilitated safe and effective MI procedures for treating lumbar degenerative diseases. XLIF and OLIF can achieve clinical outcomes equivalent to MIS-TLIF by indirect decompression. XLIF and OLIF showed less blood loss, shorter hospital stays, and better disk and foraminal height restorations. In single-level L4–5, the restoration of sagittal alignment was similar between these three techniques.
목차
등록된 정보가 없습니다.
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
Comparison of Clinical and Radiologic Results of Mini-Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Extreme Lateral Interbody Fusion Indirect Decompression for Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis
Asian Spine Journal
2018 .01
-
Sagittal Balance Correction Following Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Comparison of the Three Approaches
Asian Spine Journal
2019 .01
-
Analyses of major vascular injury during oblique lateral interbody fusion (OLIF)
대한외과학회 학술대회 초록집
2019 .10
-
Perioperative Clinical Features and Long-term Prognosis After Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion (OLIF), OLIF With Anterolateral Screw Fixation, or OLIF With Percutaneous Pedicle Fixation: A Comprehensive Treatment Strategy for Patients With Lumbar Degenerative Disease
Neurospine
2023 .06
-
Commentary on “Perioperative Clinical Features and Long-term Prognosis After Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion (OLIF), OLIF With Anterolateral Screw Fixation, or OLIF With Percutaneous Pedicle Fixation: A Comprehensive Treatment Strategy for Patients With Lumbar Degenerative Disease”
Neurospine
2023 .06
-
Mini-Open Anterior Retroperitoneal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion for Lumbar Spinal Degeneration Disease
Yonsei Medical Journal
2015 .01
-
Clinical and Radiological Comparison between Three Different Minimally Invasive Surgical Fusion Techniques for Single-Level Lumbar Isthmic and Degenerative Spondylolisthesis: Minimally Invasive Surgical Posterolateral Fusion versus Minimally Invasive Surgical Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion versus Midline Lumbar Fusion
Asian Spine Journal
2018 .01
-
Open and Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Comparison of Intermediate Results and Complications
Asian Spine Journal
2015 .04
-
Mini-Open Anterior Retroperitoneal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion for Degenerated Lumbar Spinal Kyphoscoliosis
Asian Spine Journal
2015 .01
-
척추 전방 전위증에서 일측성 접근을 통한 최소 침습 경추간공 요추 추체간 유합술로 충분한 정복 및 유합을 얻을 수 있는가?: 고식적 요추 추체간 유합술 및 양측성 최소 침습 요추 추체간 유합술과의 방사선학적결과 비교
대한척추외과학회지
2017 .01
-
Risk Factors and Surgical Treatment for Recurrent Lumbar Disc Prolapse: A Review of the Literature
Asian Spine Journal
2020 .01
-
Correction of Spondylolisthesis by Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion Compared with Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion at L4-5
대한신경외과학회지
2019 .01
-
History and Evolution of the Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion
Neurospine
2022 .09
-
A Comparative Radiographic Analysis of Fusion Rate between L4-5 and L5-S1 in a Single Level Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion
Neurospine
2015 .01
-
Superior Facet Joint Violations in Single Level Minimally Invasive and Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Comparative Study
Asian Spine Journal
2020 .01
-
Is Older Age a Contraindication for Single-Level Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion?
Asian Spine Journal
2021 .01
-
Interbody Fusion in Low Grade Lumbar Spondylolsithesis: Clinical Outcome Does Not Correalte with Slip Reduction and Neural Foraminal Dimension
Asian Spine Journal
2016 .01
-
Effect of Cage in Radiological Differences between Direct and Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion Techniques
대한신경외과학회지
2019 .01
-
Elderly Patients Achieving Clinical and Radiological Outcomes Comparable with Those of Younger Patients Following Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion
Asian Spine Journal
2017 .01
-
Risk Factor Analysis of Proximal Junctional Kyphosis after Surgical Treatment of Adult Spinal Deformity with Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion
Asian Spine Journal
2021 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0