지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2015.4
- 수록면
- 185 - 193 (9page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Study Design: Prospective study.
Purpose: To compare clinical and radiological outcomes of open vs. minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MI-TLIF).
Overview of Literature: MI-TLIF promises smaller incisions and less soft tissue dissection resulting in lower morbidity and faster recovery; however, it is technically challenging.
Methods: Twenty-five patients with MI-TLIF were compared with 25 matched open TLIF controls. A minimum 2 year follow-up and a statistical analysis of perioperative and long-term outcomes were performed. Potential complications were recorded.
Results: The mean ages for the open and MI-TLIF cases were 44.4 years (range, 19?69 years) and 43.6 years (range, 20?69 years), respectively. The male:female ratio was 13:12 for both groups. Average follow-up was 26.9 months for the MI-TLIF group and 29.3 months for the open group. Operative duration was significantly longer in the MI-TLIF group than that in the open group (p <0.05). No differences in estimated blood loss, duration to ambulation, or length of stay were found. Significant improvements in the Oswestry disability index and EQ-5D functional scores were observed at 6-, 12-, and 24-months in both groups, but no significant difference was detected between the groups. Fusion rates were comparable. Cage sizes were significantly smaller in the MI-TLIF group at the L5/S1 level (p <0.05). One patient had residual spinal stenosis at the MI-TLIF level, and one patient who underwent two-level MI-TLIF developed a deep vein thrombosis resulting in a pulmonary embolism.
Conclusions: MI-TLIF and open TLIF had comparable long-term benefits. Due to technical constraints, patients should be advised on the longer operative time and potential undersizing of cages at the L5S1 level.
목차
등록된 정보가 없습니다.
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
척추 전방 전위증에서 일측성 접근을 통한 최소 침습 경추간공 요추 추체간 유합술로 충분한 정복 및 유합을 얻을 수 있는가?: 고식적 요추 추체간 유합술 및 양측성 최소 침습 요추 추체간 유합술과의 방사선학적결과 비교
대한척추외과학회지
2017 .01
-
History and Evolution of the Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion
Neurospine
2022 .09
-
Short-Term Results of Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Using Pedicle Screw with Cortical Bone Trajectory Compared with Conventional Trajectory
Asian Spine Journal
2015 .01
-
Sagittal Balance Correction Following Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Comparison of the Three Approaches
Asian Spine Journal
2019 .01
-
Is Older Age a Contraindication for Single-Level Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion?
Asian Spine Journal
2021 .01
-
Superior Facet Joint Violations in Single Level Minimally Invasive and Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Comparative Study
Asian Spine Journal
2020 .01
-
Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: An Attractive Option for Select Failed Backs
Asian Spine Journal
2018 .01
-
What Affects Segmental Lordosis of the Surgical Site after Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion?
Yonsei Medical Journal
2022 .07
-
Single-Level Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion versus Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion at L5/S1 for an Obese Population
Asian Spine Journal
2023 .04
-
Elderly Patients Achieving Clinical and Radiological Outcomes Comparable with Those of Younger Patients Following Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion
Asian Spine Journal
2017 .01
-
Clinical and Radiological Comparison between Three Different Minimally Invasive Surgical Fusion Techniques for Single-Level Lumbar Isthmic and Degenerative Spondylolisthesis: Minimally Invasive Surgical Posterolateral Fusion versus Minimally Invasive Surgical Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion versus Midline Lumbar Fusion
Asian Spine Journal
2018 .01
-
Correction of Spondylolisthesis by Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion Compared with Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion at L4-5
대한신경외과학회지
2019 .01
-
Impact of Iliac Crest Bone Grafting on Postoperative Outcomes and Complication Rates Following Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion
Neurospine
2019 .01
-
Spine Surgery, Ganga Hospital, Coimbatore, India
Asian Spine Journal
2018 .01
-
The Use of Dual Direction Expandable Titanium Cage With Biportal Endoscopic Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Technical Consideration With Preliminary Results
Neurospine
2023 .03
-
Comparison of Clinical and Radiologic Results of Mini-Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Extreme Lateral Interbody Fusion Indirect Decompression for Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis
Asian Spine Journal
2018 .01
-
Robot-Guided Transforaminal Versus Robot-Guided Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Lumbar Degenerative Disease
Neurospine
2021 .01
-
Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for the Surgical Management of Post-Discectomy Syndrome
Asian Spine Journal
2020 .01
-
Aortic Injury during Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion
Neurospine
2017 .01
-
Radiation Dose Reduction and Surgical Efficiency Improvement in Endoscopic Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Assisted by Intraoperative O-arm Navigation: A Retrospective Observational Study
Neurospine
2022 .06
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0