메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
김현광 (한국성서대학교)
저널정보
한국복음주의신약학회 신약연구 신약연구 제14권 제4호
발행연도
2015.12
수록면
431 - 457 (27page)
DOI
10.24229/kents.2015.14.4.001

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
John and the Synoptics. This is one of the much debated issues in the twentieth century. See D. Moody Smith, R. Kysar for the most helpful review of the history of the debate in twentieth century. D. Moody Smith, John among the Gospels, 2nd Ed (Columbia: University of South Carolina Press, 2001); R. Kysar, “The Gospel of John in current Research”, RelSRev 9 (1983), 314-23. Not a few articles and books have been published on this subject. Some scholarly meetings were devoted to explore this subject. For instance, in 1990, some 150 New Testament scholars participated in the thirty-ninth session of the Colloquium Biblicum Lovaniense (Aug 7-9, 1990) with the issue of “John and the Synoptics.” The book John and the Synoptics, edited by Adelbert Denaux, contains twenty-four offered papers in this Colloquium as wells as some other papers of the invited speakers regarding this issue. Adelbert Denaux, John and the Synoptics (Leuven: Leuven University Press, 1992). This debate arises due to the Fourth Gospels’ characteristic differences from as well as similarities to the Synoptic Gospels. In this article, we will consider two opposite positions suggested to explain the differences and similarities between John and the Synoptic Gospels: (1) John knew and used the Synoptic Gospels in writing his Gospel and (2) John did not use them but used the common traditions. The second position will be supported in this article.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (40)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0