메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
Yang Chanxi (안양대학교) 이영 (안양대학교)
저널정보
고려대학교 중국학연구소 중국학논총 중국학논총 제75호
발행연도
2022.3
수록면
261 - 282 (22page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Using the comparative analysis method, a comparative analysis of the content related to social subjects in China's General High School Geography Curriculum Standard (2017 Edition Revised 2020) and South Korea's 2015 Revised Education Curriculum was conducted from six aspects: curriculum system, curriculum objectives, nature of the curriculum, curriculum content, curriculum implementation, and curriculum evaluation, and an analysis of the pros and cons of the design of the curriculum standards in the two countries can be found: 1. Different course systems and significant differences in course structure and number of class hours;2. Different curriculum objectives, with the Chinese Geography Curriculum Standard having obvious disciplinary objectives and the Korean Social Curriculum Standard having an integrated emphasis on the cultivation of the "human being";3. The nature of the curriculum is fundamentally different, with the Chinese geography curriculum retaining the geography subject system intact, while the Korean social curriculum has weakened physical geography, merged and abolished economic geography, and reduced and transferred parts of geography technology and practice;4. a mixture of gains and losses in curriculum content, with some similarity in the Chinese Geography, Korean Geography, World Geography, and Tourism Geography curricula, and greater variation in the curriculum in the area of Earth Science;5. the coinciding requirements of curriculum implementation, which both demand "practicality" and promote diverse learning styles;6. Curriculum evaluation has a positive emphasis on diversity and pluralism, but the focus of evaluation varies. The high school curricula in China and South Korea are still undergoing deepening reforms, so consider the following inspirations for developing the high school social curriculum in South Korea for China: 1. The content of the social studies curriculum is multidisciplinary, reflecting interdisciplinarity and addressing the realities of "load reduction";2. Faster curriculum revision cycle with rich experience in curriculum reform. The development of the Chinese high school geography curriculum has the following implications for Korea: 1. Safeguard disciplinary integrity in the curriculum, which can draw on the diversity and standardization of the types of geography curriculum in China;2. The integration of multiple educational philosophies for a rigorous and orderly educational theory.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0