지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2023.6
- 수록면
- 55 - 92 (38page)
- DOI
- 10.29323/mchina.2023.6.98.55
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
North China"s rural society is considered as a very typical rural areas, characterized by low agricultural productivity and scarce land. The majority of farmers relied on small plots of land for their livelihood, with independent farmers constituting the vast majority within the agricultural class. Wealthy farmers mostly hired short-term and long-term workers for cultivation instead of offering tenancy. This led to difficulties in acquiring land for many farmers, resulting in an increase in short-term and long-term work near villages or resulting in rural migration of engaging in non-agricultural occupations. The socio-economic conditions, underdeveloped transportation, and low degree of commercialization in North China"s rural areas influenced the formation of specific characteristics within rural families, including a higher proportion of large families compared to South China.
In the pre-modern period, North China rural families had an economic community structure that unified income and consumption, known as ‘Common Property of Cohabitants’. Family members contributed their income to a common account, which they used together and accumulated the rest as additional property. ‘Common Property of Cohabitants’ was run by the head of the family. The most important job of the head of the family was to manage and distribute income and consumption. In particular, the head of the family held an absolute position in the ‘Large family’ because they had the authority to manage and operate property, such as land and houses, which were directly related to the survival of family members.
Male blood relatives held shares in the common property and contributed to its formation and growth, while women held subordinate positions and did not directly contribute to the property"s development. In addition, the system of ‘Common Property of Cohabitants’ had the principle that all income from labor was attributed to the common account, while a small amount of income obtained free of charge, not as a return for labor, was not included and belonged to the individual.
The ‘Common Property of Cohabitants’ was a structure in which all the income of the family members was handed over to the head of the family, and when necessary, it was received from the head of the family. When consuming, it was paid according to necessity regardless of the contribution of the family. The remaining income was accumulated in property and distributed equally to the brothers at the time of property division. This principle was extended even when a family member moved to another place and took another job.
However, gradually there were cases where these principles were not followed. For instance, individuals could use the money to purchase land in another region or retain a portion of the income instead of sending the entire amount to the family. This change indicates that the socio-economic transformations that occurred in North China during 1930s and 1940s also influenced the internal operation of the traditional ‘Common Property of Cohabitants’ system. It also seems to be related to the fact that the concept of rights to personal property was formed with the enforcement of the Civil Law. Although it cannot be said that these legal changes caused immediate changes in North china rural families, it seems to have shaken at least the traditional ‘Common Property of Cohabitants’ principle.
In the pre-modern period, North China rural families had an economic community structure that unified income and consumption, known as ‘Common Property of Cohabitants’. Family members contributed their income to a common account, which they used together and accumulated the rest as additional property. ‘Common Property of Cohabitants’ was run by the head of the family. The most important job of the head of the family was to manage and distribute income and consumption. In particular, the head of the family held an absolute position in the ‘Large family’ because they had the authority to manage and operate property, such as land and houses, which were directly related to the survival of family members.
Male blood relatives held shares in the common property and contributed to its formation and growth, while women held subordinate positions and did not directly contribute to the property"s development. In addition, the system of ‘Common Property of Cohabitants’ had the principle that all income from labor was attributed to the common account, while a small amount of income obtained free of charge, not as a return for labor, was not included and belonged to the individual.
The ‘Common Property of Cohabitants’ was a structure in which all the income of the family members was handed over to the head of the family, and when necessary, it was received from the head of the family. When consuming, it was paid according to necessity regardless of the contribution of the family. The remaining income was accumulated in property and distributed equally to the brothers at the time of property division. This principle was extended even when a family member moved to another place and took another job.
However, gradually there were cases where these principles were not followed. For instance, individuals could use the money to purchase land in another region or retain a portion of the income instead of sending the entire amount to the family. This change indicates that the socio-economic transformations that occurred in North China during 1930s and 1940s also influenced the internal operation of the traditional ‘Common Property of Cohabitants’ system. It also seems to be related to the fact that the concept of rights to personal property was formed with the enforcement of the Civil Law. Although it cannot be said that these legal changes caused immediate changes in North china rural families, it seems to have shaken at least the traditional ‘Common Property of Cohabitants’ principle.
목차
Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 화북의 사회경제와 농촌가정
Ⅲ. ‘동거공재’의 구조와 운영
Ⅳ. 맺음말
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
朝鮮作家權近的“記”體古文
中國散文硏究集刊
2019 .01
-
영남지방 목관묘와 사로국
한국고대사연구
2016 .06
-
동거의 의미 외 4편
시조시학
2022 .06
-
중국의 전략적 신흥산업 정책과 지방정부 발전경쟁-산업발전과 생산능력 과잉의 딜레마-
한중관계연구
2018 .01
-
1930-40년대 화북 농촌가정의 分家와 분가 후의 가족공동체
중국근현대사연구
2024 .06
-
가족 의사소통에 대한 구성원들의 인식 연구 : 대학생 자녀를 둔 가정을 중심으로
국어교육연구
2015 .06
-
비대면 시대의 가정공동체
인격주의 생명윤리
2021 .01
-
가정유형에 따른 자기조절학습능력의 차이 : 성별과 학년의 효과
순천향 인문과학논총
2019 .01
-
일본의 가족 형태에 대한 연구사적 규명
일본문화연구
2015 .01
-
건강한 기독교 가정을 세우기 위한 기독교교육적 돌봄
기독교교육 논총
2015 .01
-
중화민국 민법의 제정과 전통 ‘家産制’의 변화
동양사학연구
2020 .06
-
변화하는 미국 가정
인간연구
2015 .01
-
입시 청소년 가족을 위한 기독상담적 접근: 드라마 ‘SKY캐슬’ 가족분석을 중심으로
신학논단
2020 .09
-
러시아 가족형태 다양화와 여성의 역할 문제: 대도시 여성의 일·가족 양립 경험을 중심으로
러시아어문학연구논집
2018 .01
-
마을공동체 제의 관련 유무형 공유자원의 형성과정과 전승양상
비교민속학
2015 .04
-
누구의, 누구를 위한 가정인가?
제3시대
2016 .05
-
1960년대 초반 북중관계 밀착 연구
중국근현대사연구
2022 .06
-
축소 가족 사회에서 교회의 가족을 위한 교육 목회
신학논단
2023 .12
-
‘1인 가구 시대’ 한국 천주교회의 가정사목 연구 - 가족 공론장의 변화와 교회의 과제를 중심으로 -
가톨릭신학
2018 .01
-
[흐르는 강물처럼-2회] 불편한 동거
월간에세이
2023 .10
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0