지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2023.10
- 수록면
- 135 - 159 (25page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
In communication, the way in which information is conveyed in sentences is essential. Every language possesses language-specific methods in which information is expressed. In the case of the Mandarin Chinese language, information packaging is directly expressed through word ordering.
The Chinese sentences ‘Wo jiu shi(我就是)’ and ‘Jiu shi wo(就是我)’, which are the subjects of this study, are interpreted as ‘저입니다(It’s me)’ in Korean. However, selectional restrictions of these sentences exist and are dependent upon the context. Therefore, this study aims to reveal that the selectional restrictions are caused by differences in information structures through the analysis of discourse context, focus structure, and accent distribution.
Based on the findings of this study, the following conclusions can be drawn:
First, when answering a question with ‘Wo jiu shi’ or ‘Jiu shi wo’, there is a tendency to maintain the information structure of the question asked.
Second, in the copular sentence ‘X是Y’, ‘X’ is an unmarked constituent that refers to the denotation of a referent(object). Further, ‘Y’ is an unmarked constituent that refers to the connotation of the referent and sometimes is marked as referring to denotation in the equative relation.
Third, in the ‘X是Y’ structure, ‘X’ becomes an unmarked topic and ‘Y’ becomes the natural focus. However, when an exclusive focus is required in the context of an open proposition, the speaker can utter ‘Wo jiu shi’. In this case, the accented stress occurs in the subject ‘Wo(我)’. In other words, when looking for a specific entity within a group, such as ‘laoban zai ma?(老板在吗?)’ or ‘≪zhenlibao≫ jizhe shi na wei?(≪真理报≫记者是哪位?)’, the speaker can answer ‘Wo jiu shi’ regardless of the word order of the question asked.
Fourth, the predicate-focus structure ‘Wo jiu shi’ is divided into the following three types. First, the pro-verbal form ‘shi(是)’ is the focus and it is a substitution of the predicate in the previous sentence. Second, the predicate ‘Jiu shi (NP)(就是(NP))’ is the focus. Third, the sentence is a verum-focus structure that emphasizes propositional truth, and ‘Jiu(就)’ is accented.
Fifth, ‘Jiu shi wo’ is realized with two information structures: the predicate- focus(object) struct ure in which ‘wo’ is the focus; and, the verum-focus structure in which ‘jiu’ is the focus.
The Chinese sentences ‘Wo jiu shi(我就是)’ and ‘Jiu shi wo(就是我)’, which are the subjects of this study, are interpreted as ‘저입니다(It’s me)’ in Korean. However, selectional restrictions of these sentences exist and are dependent upon the context. Therefore, this study aims to reveal that the selectional restrictions are caused by differences in information structures through the analysis of discourse context, focus structure, and accent distribution.
Based on the findings of this study, the following conclusions can be drawn:
First, when answering a question with ‘Wo jiu shi’ or ‘Jiu shi wo’, there is a tendency to maintain the information structure of the question asked.
Second, in the copular sentence ‘X是Y’, ‘X’ is an unmarked constituent that refers to the denotation of a referent(object). Further, ‘Y’ is an unmarked constituent that refers to the connotation of the referent and sometimes is marked as referring to denotation in the equative relation.
Third, in the ‘X是Y’ structure, ‘X’ becomes an unmarked topic and ‘Y’ becomes the natural focus. However, when an exclusive focus is required in the context of an open proposition, the speaker can utter ‘Wo jiu shi’. In this case, the accented stress occurs in the subject ‘Wo(我)’. In other words, when looking for a specific entity within a group, such as ‘laoban zai ma?(老板在吗?)’ or ‘≪zhenlibao≫ jizhe shi na wei?(≪真理报≫记者是哪位?)’, the speaker can answer ‘Wo jiu shi’ regardless of the word order of the question asked.
Fourth, the predicate-focus structure ‘Wo jiu shi’ is divided into the following three types. First, the pro-verbal form ‘shi(是)’ is the focus and it is a substitution of the predicate in the previous sentence. Second, the predicate ‘Jiu shi (NP)(就是(NP))’ is the focus. Third, the sentence is a verum-focus structure that emphasizes propositional truth, and ‘Jiu(就)’ is accented.
Fifth, ‘Jiu shi wo’ is realized with two information structures: the predicate- focus(object) struct ure in which ‘wo’ is the focus; and, the verum-focus structure in which ‘jiu’ is the focus.
목차
1. 前言
2. 现有的研究和相关理论介绍
3. 系词疑问句的回答
4. 此外情况
5. 确认命题真理值
6. 结论
參考文獻
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
현대중국어 ‘是(시)’에 대한 재고찰
중국어교육과연구
2023 .11
-
‘是……的’ 강조구문 고찰 - 문법화의 관점에서
중국언어연구
2021 .10
-
현대중국어 ‘S是V的O’와 ‘S是VO的’ 구문의 대조 분석
중국언어연구
2023 .06
-
韩中化妆品用语对比
동아인문학
2016 .03
-
고대 중국어의 초점 유형 및 초점 표현 방식
중국어문학
2022 .04
-
‘是不是NP’의문문의 화행과 한국어 대응 형식 연구
중어중문학
2016 .06
-
宋代『神宗實錄』의 編修와『宋史』「王安石傳」
韓國史學史學報
2018 .01
-
『管子』“是”判斷句中“是”的詞性探析
중국어문학논집
2023 .04
-
명대 是……的형식 과거의미 분석 : 『수호전』, 『서유기』를 중심으로
중국어문학논집
2015 .04
-
‘X是X’ 구문의 분류 및 화용 특성 연구
중국어문논역총간
2025 .01
-
한국어 ‘-ㄴ 것이다’ 구문과 중국어 ‘是……的’ 구문의 대조 연구
이중언어학
2022 .03
-
고려전기 복시(覆試)의 시행과 기능
역사와현실
2017 .12
-
‘視’ 비교 구문에 대한 통시적 연구
중어중문학
2022 .12
-
Two Different C-Commands in Intra-Argument Structures and Inter-Argument Structures: Focus on Binding Principles B and A
영미연구
2019 .01
-
对韩教学中副词“就”的语法点描写建议- 基于对比分析和偏误分析相结合的考察 -
철학∙사상∙문화
2017 .06
-
“是…的”(2)구문의 화용적 특징과 교육
중국어문학논집
2017 .12
-
On the Distribution of the Copula shi in Chinese Pseudo-Sluicing and Pseudo-Fragmenting
언어와언어학
2016 .01
-
중국어 ‘NP+是+XP’구문과 한국어 보조사 ‘은/는’의 대응 관계 고찰
중국어교육과연구
2022 .11
-
“是……的”焦点结构及其相关问题探讨
한중언어문화연구
2018 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-151-24-02-088337119