메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
이은정 (경북대학교)
저널정보
한국가족법학회 가족법연구 가족법연구 제37권 제1호
발행연도
2023.3
수록면
201 - 228 (28page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This article reviews and analyzes precedent court cases that recognize the validity of adoption in fraudulent birth registration prior to the revision of the Civil Code in 2012. It also discusses the need for and measures to protect the ‘social parenthood,’ after the Civil Code revision in 2012 focusing on revising the action for confirming the non-existence of parentage. Analyzing the precedent court cases up until recently, the court has recognized the validity of adoptions under certain conditions by interpreting fraudulent birth registration, in order to protect the relationship between parties who have socially and emotionally established a parent-child relationship for decades. However, under the current adoption system, which is a legal requirement for permission from the family court, when a fraudulent birth registration is filed without permission from the family court, the valid of adoption cannot be recognized. Therefore, there are limits to protecting social parenthood through legal interpretation in cases where fraudulent birth registration have been made, and legal amendment should be sought to protect such relationships. In order to protect social parenthood, the minimum requirements such as ‘intention to establish parent-child relationship, the burden of parenting responsibility, and duration of maintaining the parent-child relationship’ should be considered. Additionally, when deciding who is the legal parent, ‘the best interests of the child’ must take precedence.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0