지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Fragment answers consist of a non-sentential XP but convey the same propositional content as fully sentential answers, inducing form-meaning mismatch. Similar to sluicing, fragments thus allow to unexpress clausal material, but the unexpressed, elided material needs to be recovered in a proper way. This paper discusses two different approaches for the analysis of fragments in Korean: ellipsis and direct interpretation approaches. Discussing several key empirical facts, the paper argues for a direct interpretation approach, couched upon the framework of Construction- based HPSG and an independently motivated theory of dialogue context. This analysis can offer a streamlined analysis for the flexible connectivity effects and discourse initial fragments with no linguistic correlate.
목차
등록된 정보가 없습니다.
참고문헌 (34)
참고문헌 신청
Ahn, Hee-Don / 2012 / Fragments in English and Korean (In Korean) / Hankwuk Publishing
Ahn, Hee-Don / 2012 / Fragments vs. null arguments in Korean / Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on HPSG : 369 ~ 387
AnderBois, Scott / 2010 / Sluicing as anaphora to issues / Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory : 451 ~ 470
AnderBois, Scott / 2014 / The semantics of sluicing: beyond truth-conditions / To appear in Language
Barton, Ellen / 1990 / Nonsentential Constituents / John Benjamins
Ahn, Hee-Don / 2012 / Fragments vs. null arguments in Korean / Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on HPSG : 369 ~ 387
AnderBois, Scott / 2010 / Sluicing as anaphora to issues / Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory : 451 ~ 470
AnderBois, Scott / 2014 / The semantics of sluicing: beyond truth-conditions / To appear in Language
Barton, Ellen / 1990 / Nonsentential Constituents / John Benjamins
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
Why-Stripping in English and Korean: A Direct Interpretation Approach
생성문법연구
2017 .01
-
A hybrid ellipsis analysis of two types of fragments in Korean
언어연구
2017 .01
-
Negated Fragments: A Direct Interpretation Approach
영어학
2020 .03
-
Fragment questions: A direct interpretation approach
언어연구
2021 .12
-
관용표현이 조각문에 관해 말해주는 것
언어학 연구
2015 .10
-
A Bi-clausal Analysis of Multiple Fragments
생성문법연구
2017 .01
-
국어 조각구에 관한 분석
언어학 연구
2016 .04
-
Notes on Bi-clausal Analysis of Multiple Fragments: A Reply to Chung (2019)
생성문법연구
2019 .01
-
Fragments of Self-Pronouns in English: A Direct Generation Analysis
영어학연구
2018 .01
-
한국어 조각문의 형성 과정: (이동과) 생략
언어와 정보사회
2017 .07
-
Case and Postposition Stranding in Multiple Fragments : Why is the Final Fragment (not) Special?
어학연구
2015 .12
-
An Event-based Approach to Fragments as TP Ellipsis
생성문법연구
2017 .01
-
Fragment answers in Korean: A direct interpretation approach
언어연구
2016 .01
-
Some Notes on Ahn and Cho‘s (2017a, b, c) Approach to Fragment Answers in Korean
생성문법연구
2019 .01
-
Idiomatic Fragment Answers in Negation
영어영문학연구
2016 .01
-
On Caseless Fragments and Some Implications
어학연구
2017 .08
-
Asymmetry of Deletion within the Pied-Piping Fragment
언어와 정보
2019 .02
-
Notes on Fragments with Tag Questions in English and Korean
생성문법연구
2018 .01
-
No Repair-By-Ellipsis : With Reference to Contrastive Idiomatic and NPI Fragments Offending Islands
언어학 연구
2017 .01
-
On the Licensing Condition for Corrective Fragments
영어학
2015 .12
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0