지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Researchers studying the Chosun Survey project of Land-ownership which was conducted by the Japanese imperial authorities, have heen evaluating thls project for a long time and either chose to consider it to be an event which established a modern land-ownership system, or chose to blame it that it paved the way for japanese authorities' indiscriminate plundering of colonized Chosun's resources.
In this article, discussions and debates which appeared, ended or continued far the past several decades regarding the nature of this project are examined in periodic order. And other issues regarding the subject that should be examined yet never had been actually considered are suggested for examination as well.
During the 1930s there had been a debate over the nature of agricultural communities. Since the 1960s the so-called 'Internal Development' theory has been suggested along with a series of studies dealing with the Japanese plundering cf Korean resources. Then in the mid-1980s more practical researches began to be announced, and the so-called 'Colony Modernization' theory went through same re-evaluations.
In all these debates, several important issues were tackled with and discussed. These issues are as follows: ① The preparations made for the project by the Japanese authorities, and several principles laid out by them regarding actual survey efforts, ② The changes made to the traditional registering methods while the establishment of a modernized land-ownership system was being attempted, ③ The actual survey procedures of the status of land-ownership, and the matter of the registration system, and ④ The Japanese authorities' monetary plans, and the matter of whether there was actually a development of a modernized taxation system in progress or not.
And as said earlier, several suggestions by this researcher are also made in this aIticle. First, the issue of whether the principle laid out for the survey project was based upon a 'Reporting system' or not, was examined. After a careful examination of the revision process of the 1913's 'Toji Shingo Shimdeuk Register' ('Register of reported land-ownership status'), it came to this researcher's attention that this documentation, which seems to have been used in verifying the owner of certain lands and validating the ownership, was more of a list of land tax from regions surveyed by the authorities, than a register of 'reported' cases of land-ownership status. So in this article this researcher suggested that the principle for the survey task shouId be titled as a 'Researching system' than a 'Reporting system'.
Another efforts of this researcher included examining the boundary and nature of the 'new' land-ownerships which were newly established by the survey project, and the relativity between the Japanese authorities' survey project and the Daehan Empire's own ownership-related survey plans as weIl. In the process, the traditional approach of researchers using the Empire's efforts as an example In 'validating' the 'Internal Development' theory was criticized.
Studies of the establishment process of a modern land-ownership system wiII eventually contribute in today's completion of those several ill-fated theories regarding land-ownership reformation plans which did not succeed during those transitional periods. And they will hopefully pave the way far the advent of a more ideal social structure, "where the agricultural workforce will receive more attention and support.
In this article, discussions and debates which appeared, ended or continued far the past several decades regarding the nature of this project are examined in periodic order. And other issues regarding the subject that should be examined yet never had been actually considered are suggested for examination as well.
During the 1930s there had been a debate over the nature of agricultural communities. Since the 1960s the so-called 'Internal Development' theory has been suggested along with a series of studies dealing with the Japanese plundering cf Korean resources. Then in the mid-1980s more practical researches began to be announced, and the so-called 'Colony Modernization' theory went through same re-evaluations.
In all these debates, several important issues were tackled with and discussed. These issues are as follows: ① The preparations made for the project by the Japanese authorities, and several principles laid out by them regarding actual survey efforts, ② The changes made to the traditional registering methods while the establishment of a modernized land-ownership system was being attempted, ③ The actual survey procedures of the status of land-ownership, and the matter of the registration system, and ④ The Japanese authorities' monetary plans, and the matter of whether there was actually a development of a modernized taxation system in progress or not.
And as said earlier, several suggestions by this researcher are also made in this aIticle. First, the issue of whether the principle laid out for the survey project was based upon a 'Reporting system' or not, was examined. After a careful examination of the revision process of the 1913's 'Toji Shingo Shimdeuk Register' ('Register of reported land-ownership status'), it came to this researcher's attention that this documentation, which seems to have been used in verifying the owner of certain lands and validating the ownership, was more of a list of land tax from regions surveyed by the authorities, than a register of 'reported' cases of land-ownership status. So in this article this researcher suggested that the principle for the survey task shouId be titled as a 'Researching system' than a 'Reporting system'.
Another efforts of this researcher included examining the boundary and nature of the 'new' land-ownerships which were newly established by the survey project, and the relativity between the Japanese authorities' survey project and the Daehan Empire's own ownership-related survey plans as weIl. In the process, the traditional approach of researchers using the Empire's efforts as an example In 'validating' the 'Internal Development' theory was criticized.
Studies of the establishment process of a modern land-ownership system wiII eventually contribute in today's completion of those several ill-fated theories regarding land-ownership reformation plans which did not succeed during those transitional periods. And they will hopefully pave the way far the advent of a more ideal social structure, "where the agricultural workforce will receive more attention and support.
목차
머리말
1. 조선토지조사사업의 연구시각 변화와 주요 논점
2. 조선토지조사사업 연구의 시론적 검토
맺음말
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
경남 창원지역 토지조사의 시행과정과 장부체계의 변화
역사와현실
2007 .09
-
Land Reform and Colonial Land Legislation in Korea, 1894–1910
Korea Journal
2014 .09
-
白南雲의 토지소유론과 그 시대적 의미 : 《朝鮮封建社會經濟史(上)》을 중심으로
한국사연구
2009 .06
-
[특집3 : 토지조사사업 연구] 일본제국의 식민지 토지조사사업에 대한 비교사적 검토
역사와현실
2003 .12
-
조선후기 경상도 지역 양반층의 토지소유규모와 지가의 변동
역사와경계
2010 .12
-
고려시대 토지소유관계 재론
역사와현실
2006 .12
-
The Legal Nature of Land Ownership in the Yi Dynasty
Korea Journal
1975 .10
-
한말 일제초기 공토 정책과 국유민유 분쟁
한국민족문화
2012 .11
-
중국의 도시화와 공공토지 사유화
역사비평
2016 .08
-
조선토지조사사업에서 국유지의 조사와 활용 : 경남 창원지역 사례를 통해서
역사와현실
2007 .09
-
일제시기 창원군『임야조사서』분석과 소유구조 변화
역사와 담론
2011 .08
-
秦˙漢의 土地所有制
중국사연구
2010 .01
-
조선후기 양반층의 토지소유규모 변화
지방사와 지방문화
2010 .05
-
한말~일제초 근대적 토지소유권의 확정과 국유ㆍ민유의 분기 : 경기도 안산 석장둔(石場屯)의 사례
역사와현실
2010 .09
-
공공성의 관점에서 본 한국 토지보유세의 역사와 의미
역사비평
2011 .02
-
대한제국기 김가진의 충주지역 토지 소유와 의의
한국독립운동사연구
2017 .05
-
한말 일제 초 토지소유권 법령의 제정과 의미변화 - 조선총독부 고등법원의 해석을 중심으로 -
역사연구
2019 .06
-
일제 경제수탈 관련 교과서 내용에 대한 비판론의 대두와 교과서 서술상의 그 반영 방안
역사교육
2008 .09
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
동아시아 비교사의 방법과 의미 : 미야지마 히로시의 동아시아 근대사론
왕현종
역사비평
2013
.11
[사실, 이렇게 본다 2] 갑오개혁의 쟁점과 역사적 교훈
왕현종
내일을 여는 역사
2003
.02
일제 조선 토지조사사업에 관한 '식민지근대화론' 비판
주종환
역사비평
1999
.05
동아시아의 근대를 둘러싼 모색의 기록 : 『나의 한국사 공부』『일본의 역사관을 비판한다』를 읽고
이타가키 류타
역사비평
2013
.11
일제하의 지방통치 시스템과 군 단위 ‘관료-유지 지배체제’ : 윤해동 저, 『지배와 자치』(역사비평사, 2006)에 대한 논평
지수걸
역사와현실
2007
.03
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-911-013726191