지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The Japanese imperial authorities initiated the land-ownership survey project in August 1910, and ordered all land owners to submit a (land-ownership status report) which would indicate all the information regarding the land they were owning. Such submission was defined as an obligatory task.
The Japanese also created certain registers which would undoubtedly be required in surveying the status of land-ownership in Korea, prior to their launch of the land-ownership survey project. The so-called 'Gyeol Units Register(a register indicating number of Gyeol units of specified lands/결수연명부)' and a 'Map of lands subject to Taxation(課稅地見取圖)', were newly created. The former document indicated the identities of the land owners and the size of the land they owned(mostly correctly), but the exact locations of those land units were not specified. On the other hand, the latter material indicated both the locations of certain land units and the current owners of those lands. Creating these registers were undoubtedly a preliminary step that was needed to be taken in order to have the Korean land owners to submit their own status of land ownership. When submitting and receiving land-ownership reports, it was strictly required to be cross-checked with both materials mentioned above.
In this article, the cases that were collected from total of 19 Ri units inside the Gyeongsang Nam-do province's Changweon-gun Naeseo-myeon village are analyzed. And the result shows us that both the Gyeol Units Register and the Map of lands subject to Taxation were not mere cross-checking materials to verify the contents of the individual land-ownership status reports. All kinds of problems cropped up in the process of reporting individual statuses of land-ownership. Cases of separations or merges of land units, and various kinds of changes concerning certain land-ownership cases were increasing, and as a result more than 15~20% of the land units were showing changes in ownership. Putting the situations of other areas' land units into account, we can see that more than 40% of the originally reported situations were going through certain changes at various levels. Naturally, the Japanese imperial authorities came to the conclusion that the contents of the land-ownership status reports were not entirely reliable, so instead of depending solely upon individual reports, the Japanese also relied upon their own verification by executing cross-checking with other references(land-related registers) and launching actual on-the-spot inspections. In other words, the office in charge of the land-ownership survey task, under the authority of the Japanese imperial authorities, did not finalize the land-ownership survey results depending only upon land-owners(land-lords)' individual reports.
It can be said that the principle of (voluntarily submitting) reports, which had been considered and promoted as an advanced and positive side to be featured by the Japanese survey project of Korean land-ownership statuses, was nothing but a mechanism that would allow the Japanese authorities to complete a more thorough and forceful survey.
The Japanese also created certain registers which would undoubtedly be required in surveying the status of land-ownership in Korea, prior to their launch of the land-ownership survey project. The so-called 'Gyeol Units Register(a register indicating number of Gyeol units of specified lands/결수연명부)' and a 'Map of lands subject to Taxation(課稅地見取圖)', were newly created. The former document indicated the identities of the land owners and the size of the land they owned(mostly correctly), but the exact locations of those land units were not specified. On the other hand, the latter material indicated both the locations of certain land units and the current owners of those lands. Creating these registers were undoubtedly a preliminary step that was needed to be taken in order to have the Korean land owners to submit their own status of land ownership. When submitting and receiving land-ownership reports, it was strictly required to be cross-checked with both materials mentioned above.
In this article, the cases that were collected from total of 19 Ri units inside the Gyeongsang Nam-do province's Changweon-gun Naeseo-myeon village are analyzed. And the result shows us that both the Gyeol Units Register and the Map of lands subject to Taxation were not mere cross-checking materials to verify the contents of the individual land-ownership status reports. All kinds of problems cropped up in the process of reporting individual statuses of land-ownership. Cases of separations or merges of land units, and various kinds of changes concerning certain land-ownership cases were increasing, and as a result more than 15~20% of the land units were showing changes in ownership. Putting the situations of other areas' land units into account, we can see that more than 40% of the originally reported situations were going through certain changes at various levels. Naturally, the Japanese imperial authorities came to the conclusion that the contents of the land-ownership status reports were not entirely reliable, so instead of depending solely upon individual reports, the Japanese also relied upon their own verification by executing cross-checking with other references(land-related registers) and launching actual on-the-spot inspections. In other words, the office in charge of the land-ownership survey task, under the authority of the Japanese imperial authorities, did not finalize the land-ownership survey results depending only upon land-owners(land-lords)' individual reports.
It can be said that the principle of (voluntarily submitting) reports, which had been considered and promoted as an advanced and positive side to be featured by the Japanese survey project of Korean land-ownership statuses, was nothing but a mechanism that would allow the Japanese authorities to complete a more thorough and forceful survey.
목차
서언
1. 일제의 조선 토지조사사업과 장부체계
2. 창원군 내서면 토지조사와 소유권 조사의 방식
결론
〈Abstract〉
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
Land Reform and Colonial Land Legislation in Korea, 1894–1910
Korea Journal
2014 .09
-
조선후기 경상도 지역 양반층의 토지소유규모와 지가의 변동
역사와경계
2010 .12
-
[특집3 : 토지조사사업 연구] 조선토지조사사업 연구의 과제와 시론적 검토
역사와현실
2003 .12
-
白南雲의 토지소유론과 그 시대적 의미 : 《朝鮮封建社會經濟史(上)》을 중심으로
한국사연구
2009 .06
-
중국의 도시화와 공공토지 사유화
역사비평
2016 .08
-
한말 일제초기 공토 정책과 국유민유 분쟁
한국민족문화
2012 .11
-
고려시대 토지소유관계 재론
역사와현실
2006 .12
-
These People in This Land
Korea Journal
1971 .07
-
秦˙漢의 土地所有制
중국사연구
2010 .01
-
공공성의 관점에서 본 한국 토지보유세의 역사와 의미
역사비평
2011 .02
-
조선토지조사사업에서 국유지의 조사와 활용 : 경남 창원지역 사례를 통해서
역사와현실
2007 .09
-
20세기 후반 고려 전시과 연구의 定礎 : 《高麗土地制度史硏究》를 통해본 강진철의 연구 성과와 의의
한국사연구
2009 .06
-
일제초기 창원군 과세지견취도의 내용과 성격
한국민족문화
2011 .07
-
대한제국기 김가진의 충주지역 토지 소유와 의의
한국독립운동사연구
2017 .05
-
19세기 조선과 베트남의 토지개혁론에 대한 비교사적 검토 : 토지소유를 둘러싼 제도와 관습의 차이를 중심으로
역사학보
2010 .06
-
The Waste Land 小考
코기토
1967 .12
-
The Legal Nature of Land Ownership in the Yi Dynasty
Korea Journal
1975 .10
-
조선후기 양반층의 토지소유규모 변화
지방사와 지방문화
2010 .05
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-911-015958360