메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국기업법학회 기업법연구 기업법연구 제19권 제1호
발행연도
2005.3
수록면
9 - 43 (35page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Over the years, international cartels have become a key problem among anti-competitive practices. Nowadays they have even been regarded as a kind of criminal activity in some countries.
To eradicate these cartels, the extraterritorial application of antitrust laws is, commonly considered one of the more reasonable methods. There are 4 groups of theories about the extraterritorial application of antitrust laws; to name it, effect doctrine, jurisdictional rule of reason, economic unit doctrine and implementation doctrine. Among these, the effect doctrine is the most widely accepted.
However, owing to the extraterritorial application of a national antitrust law, adverse reactions from foreign countries are apt to arise. Therefore, mutual agreements are needed between governments concerned.
To achieve these goals, facilitating and strengthening the use of the positive comity standard could be a means of deepening mutual cooperation, which is a prerequisite for expanding and enhancing co-operation widely. It is also useful for developing a competition rule of uniform global application.
Initially, Korea had been anxious about the extraterritorial application of the U.S. and ED antitrust law. This led Korea to become proactive in applying its law extraterritorially to international cartels. Now, after its recent actions, the KFTC has declared that it will launch further investigations into international cartels that may be causing damage and losses to Korean companies and consumers. Such action, however, should not be regarded as an overall application of Korean law, but rather as a limited application to international cases of serious illegality.

목차

Ⅰ. 들어가며

Ⅱ. 카르텔과 국제카르텔

Ⅲ. 국제카르텔에 대한 대응

Ⅳ. 국제카르텔에 대한 국내 독점규제법의 적용

Ⅴ. 공정거래위원회와 적극적 예양

Ⅵ. 맺는말

참고문헌

Abstract

참고문헌 (35)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-366-014536303