지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This study aims to explore how corporate reorganization practice has changed since economic crisis of 1997. The data were selected from 174 corporate reorganization cases closed between 1997 and 2004 in the Seoul Central District Court and 28 corporate reorganization cases which are under the process as of December 31, 2004 in the same court.
This study shows that corporate reorganization practice has changed significantly in 2000, when the 1999 amendments to the Corporate Reorganization Act came into effect. These changes can be summarized as followings;
① Cases were closed earlier than before and time period between procedures became shorter.
② The court monitored receivers in a vigorous manner and receivers usually had two year term.
③ Hair-cut, debt reduction and debt-to-equity swap were widely used.
④ Sales of debtor firms under the corporate reorganization proceeding through M&A became a rule.
⑤ Repayment ratio increased gradually.
Though corporate reorganization practice has been improved in the light of expediency and efficiency after the establishment of the Bankruptcy Division in the Seoul Central District Court, the author has a doubt whether the new practice gives enough incentives to the current management or owners of debtor firms. If they loose their control over firms upon the commencement of corporate reorganization proceeding and their shares of firms according to reorganization plan, they would certainly hesitate to apply for the proceeding in an early stage of financial failing. To make corporate reorganization proceeding effective, early application is important as much as efficient management of cases. It is a new task to insolvency lawyers to find out proper incentives to management and former owners of debtor firms.
This study shows that corporate reorganization practice has changed significantly in 2000, when the 1999 amendments to the Corporate Reorganization Act came into effect. These changes can be summarized as followings;
① Cases were closed earlier than before and time period between procedures became shorter.
② The court monitored receivers in a vigorous manner and receivers usually had two year term.
③ Hair-cut, debt reduction and debt-to-equity swap were widely used.
④ Sales of debtor firms under the corporate reorganization proceeding through M&A became a rule.
⑤ Repayment ratio increased gradually.
Though corporate reorganization practice has been improved in the light of expediency and efficiency after the establishment of the Bankruptcy Division in the Seoul Central District Court, the author has a doubt whether the new practice gives enough incentives to the current management or owners of debtor firms. If they loose their control over firms upon the commencement of corporate reorganization proceeding and their shares of firms according to reorganization plan, they would certainly hesitate to apply for the proceeding in an early stage of financial failing. To make corporate reorganization proceeding effective, early application is important as much as efficient management of cases. It is a new task to insolvency lawyers to find out proper incentives to management and former owners of debtor firms.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 조사대상 회사 현황
Ⅲ. 절차진행
Ⅳ. 정리계획안
Ⅴ. 정리계획의 수행
Ⅵ. 결론
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
회생절차 M&A에 관한 법리적 고찰
한양법학
2008 .06
-
日本 會社更生法의 改正
기업법연구
2003 .12
-
會社整理法上 分割型 整理計劃에 의해 設立된 受惠會社의 整理節次 對象 與否
기업법연구
2005 .09
-
미국에서의 회사조직재편 비과세요건의 검토
조세학술논집
2008 .08
-
정부경쟁력 제고를 위한 차기정부 조직개편에 관한 연구
한국사회와 행정연구
2012 .08
-
기업회생법의 역사･현황･전망
경영법률
2014 .01
-
일본의 사적 정리절차 : 사업재생 ADR을 중심으로
저스티스
2017 .02
-
‘진흥’과 ‘안전’ 사이에서: 2011년 원자력법 재편 과정 분석
한국환경정책학회 학술대회논문집
2018 .02
-
关于企业重组样态的考察 - 从中·日比较法角度 -
원광법학
2010 .01
-
會社整理制度에 관한 硏究: 會社整理法上「訴訟의 受繼」와 法理解釋의 限界
기업법연구
2004 .03
-
통합도산법의 기업회생절차상 자산의 평가기준
기업법연구
2007 .03
-
회사정리 기간에 대한 생존분석
산업경제연구
2009 .06
-
조직통합의 특성과 조직몰입에 대한 인식분석
한국조직학회보
2014 .04
-
일본의 회사갱생절차상 해고 관련 판례 평석
노동법학
2014 .09
-
세법상 물적분할 적격요건에 관한 연구
조세법연구
2014 .08
-
도산절차에 있어서 재산 및 기업가치의 평가
고려법학
2010 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-366-015185151