지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Postmodern theorists of History have brought up Discourses on 'nation', 'nationalism' and 'nationalistic history', who aimed to criticise what history must be taught in our country. That is, overall raising objections to the current status of History Subject and the existing system of construction of subject matters. It is of much importance, I think, in that it have given the opportunities of self-reflection to the groups of Korean History and History Education.
In a global age, confronting the increasing situation of multi-national capitalism and aggressive and greedy ethnocentrism of world powers, things goes from bad to worse. Postmodern theorists of history, however, kept criticizing only negative part in the diverse faces of nationalism. Eventually it may be said that they invited a anarchic state of the evaluation.
In the modern times, nation state is real. So education of National History must present our students who will live a life in this hard times with opportunity to promote and strengthen a world view of sovereignty and independence. Education of National History have to give them a opportunity to expect our future affirmatively on the basis of open-nationalism, accepting change of things. National History Textbook should show them the course of Self-Management, Unification, and Democratization in our country. In this sense, National History that is alive will be a alternative.
Nowadays our students is going to incline to deny the established authority in school system and its Texts. For Postmodern theory of History to have a future prospect. It must accomplish the task, which is to communicate opinions with our students, collect a variety of teaching-learning cases that is in use currently at school, and advance the theory.
Problems of relation between National History and World History follows Discussions on 'Nation'. They can't combine integratively each other in existing Curriculum, not to mention a integration of History and other subjects in Social Studies. Seeking the frame by solving these problems and changing the direction newly and progressively is still serious task handed down to us.
In a global age, confronting the increasing situation of multi-national capitalism and aggressive and greedy ethnocentrism of world powers, things goes from bad to worse. Postmodern theorists of history, however, kept criticizing only negative part in the diverse faces of nationalism. Eventually it may be said that they invited a anarchic state of the evaluation.
In the modern times, nation state is real. So education of National History must present our students who will live a life in this hard times with opportunity to promote and strengthen a world view of sovereignty and independence. Education of National History have to give them a opportunity to expect our future affirmatively on the basis of open-nationalism, accepting change of things. National History Textbook should show them the course of Self-Management, Unification, and Democratization in our country. In this sense, National History that is alive will be a alternative.
Nowadays our students is going to incline to deny the established authority in school system and its Texts. For Postmodern theory of History to have a future prospect. It must accomplish the task, which is to communicate opinions with our students, collect a variety of teaching-learning cases that is in use currently at school, and advance the theory.
Problems of relation between National History and World History follows Discussions on 'Nation'. They can't combine integratively each other in existing Curriculum, not to mention a integration of History and other subjects in Social Studies. Seeking the frame by solving these problems and changing the direction newly and progressively is still serious task handed down to us.
목차
1. 序言
2. 포스트모던 역사이론의 ‘민족‘ 논의와 한국 역사학
3. 포스트모던 역사이론의 국사 교과서와 교수-학습 방안 논의
4. 포스트모던 시대 민족국가의 진로와 자국사ㆍ세계사 교육
5. 結語
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
전근대 국사의 형성과 그 발전
韓國史學史學報
2008 .01
-
세계사 교과서에서의 한국사 서술 경향과 과제 : 미국의 역사교육과 세계사 교과서 분석을 중심으로
역사교육
2005 .03
-
해방 이후 역사 교육과정 개정을 둘러싼 쟁점
역사교육
2006 .03
-
최근 중등학교 역사 교육과정 개정에 따른 세계사 과목의 편제와 내용 구성의 변화
역사교육
2011 .12
-
우리나라 대학의 세계사 교육의 문제와 개선방향
역사교육
2008 .12
-
역사교육 계열화를 위한 고등학교 국사교육 내용구성 방안
역사와 담론
2005 .04
-
동북아 시대에서 한국사 서술과 역사교육 : ‘국사’를 넘어서
역사교육
2005 .09
-
해방 후 國史敎科의 社會科化와 ‘國史科’의 置廢
역사교육
2006 .06
-
제1차 교육과정기 발행 『중등국사』 (역사교육연구회 엮음) 교과서의 특성과 의의
역사교육
2018 .06
-
미국의 자국사 교육
역사교육
2006 .12
-
역사교육의 담론과 학문적 가능성
역사교육
2006 .03
-
10학년 〈역사〉 교육과정의 ‘비교’ 내용 구성 방향
역사와 세계
2009 .06
-
[기획:사회,교육환경의 변화와 대학 한국사교육의 진로]대학 한국사 교육과 세계사 교육의 소통과 연계 방안
역사와현실
2004 .06
-
미국, 영국, 일본의 역사교육과정 동향
역사교육
1999 .09
-
Mapping World History in Korea
The Asian review of world histories
2015 .01
-
2009 개정 교육과정과 고등학교 국사 교육
역사교육
2011 .06
-
歷史理論
역사학보
1989 .12
-
유럽 역사교육의 동향과 자국사교육 : 영국과 프랑스를 중심으로
역사교육
2006 .12
-
중학교 국사교육의 의미와 내용구성
역사교육
2012 .12
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-374-015487207