지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This article deals with the problem of public policy making by American Judiciary. There are five chapters. The first chapter is introduction. In this introduction, I point out that the main theme of article lies in clarification of the current status of the public law litigation which has often cited by many scholars and politicians as the extreme example of judicial activism. In such kind of litigations, federal courts have often issued the affirmative and discrete orders to manage the states' institutions and to take over the state function.
The second chapter explains why the number of the prison reform litigation has been increased in recent years. One of the most important reasons , I think, can be attributed to the positive attitude by the Supreme Court during the Warren Court years. Needless to say, the prison institutional reform litigation, a typical example of the public law litigation, consists of large part of the public law litigation.
In such a situation, the Congress responded to the conservative circle by passing the statute named as public reform litigation of which purported to suppress the spread of prison reform litigation. Thus, I try to analyze the history and contents of the law in the third chapter. especially focusing on the constitutional issue.
The main chapter of this article is the fourth one. In that chapter. recent major decision in the area of prison reform litigation which is called Miller decision becomes the subject to be discussed. Following the fact of the case and federal lower courts' decisions, I analyze the Supreme Court decision opinioned by Judge O'Connor and characterize the decision in four points which represent the recent conservative attitude by Supreme Court toward prison reform litigation in particular and institutional reform litigation or public law litigation in general.
Following the above chapters, I describe the recent situation surrounding the institutional reform litigation in general in terms of the impact imposed upon it by the prison litigation reform act and the Miller decision. I suggest the future of institutional reform litigation is not easy to forecast.
In the last concluding chapter, I summarize the above mentioned argument and conclude that the gradual acceptance of the role by the courts and possibility of their participation in the public policy making process will be seen in many areas because that is the nature of the American society.
The second chapter explains why the number of the prison reform litigation has been increased in recent years. One of the most important reasons , I think, can be attributed to the positive attitude by the Supreme Court during the Warren Court years. Needless to say, the prison institutional reform litigation, a typical example of the public law litigation, consists of large part of the public law litigation.
In such a situation, the Congress responded to the conservative circle by passing the statute named as public reform litigation of which purported to suppress the spread of prison reform litigation. Thus, I try to analyze the history and contents of the law in the third chapter. especially focusing on the constitutional issue.
The main chapter of this article is the fourth one. In that chapter. recent major decision in the area of prison reform litigation which is called Miller decision becomes the subject to be discussed. Following the fact of the case and federal lower courts' decisions, I analyze the Supreme Court decision opinioned by Judge O'Connor and characterize the decision in four points which represent the recent conservative attitude by Supreme Court toward prison reform litigation in particular and institutional reform litigation or public law litigation in general.
Following the above chapters, I describe the recent situation surrounding the institutional reform litigation in general in terms of the impact imposed upon it by the prison litigation reform act and the Miller decision. I suggest the future of institutional reform litigation is not easy to forecast.
In the last concluding chapter, I summarize the above mentioned argument and conclude that the gradual acceptance of the role by the courts and possibility of their participation in the public policy making process will be seen in many areas because that is the nature of the American society.
#제도개혁소송
#구조적금지명령
#종결적금지명령
#구조적동의판결
#교도소소송개혁법
#사적분쟁해결
#공법소송
#공공정책형성
#사법적극주의
#Institutional Reform Litigation
#Structural injunction
#Permanent injunction
#Structural consent decree
#Prison Litigation Reform Act
#Private dispute resolution
#Public law litigation
#Public policy formation
#Judicial activism
목차
Ⅰ. 머릿말
Ⅱ. 교도소소송의 현상
Ⅲ. 교도소소송개혁법의 성립
Ⅳ. Miller 사건판결
Ⅴ. 제도개혁소송을 둘러싼 최근의 상황
Ⅵ. 끝으로
【Abstract】
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
당사자소송 - 소송의 형태를 중심으로 -
원광법학
2010 .01
-
공익소송의 입법론적 고찰
원광법학
2013 .01
-
客觀訴訟의 법리 - 일본에서의 논의를 중심으로
원광법학
2009 .01
-
다수당사자의 소송관계
법학논총
2009 .02
-
담배소송과 고엽제소송에 관한 연구 : 소송을 통한 법정책에의 영향을 중심으로
한양법학
2014 .11
-
국가기관 간의 분쟁 해결 수단으로서 항고소송의 한계
서강법률논총
2019 .08
-
행정소송에서의 원고적격 : 법원의 조사방법을 중심으로
행정법연구
2009 .12
-
행정소송에서의 기본적 사실관계 동일성의 의의 : 형사소송과의 비교를 중심으로
행정법연구
2016 .08
-
중국 민사 사건 소송비용 예납제도의 입법 개정에 관한 연구
중국법연구
2019 .01
-
지방자치단체의 소송수행자
원광법학
2011 .01
-
행정소송법 개정에 관한 소고 : 대법원과 법무부 개정안의 상호비교를 중심으로
행정법연구
2007 .08
-
가사소송의 국제적 경합
비교사법
2009 .09
-
의무이행소송의 쟁점에 대한 고찰- 독일에서의 소송상 쟁점을 중심으로 -
고려법학
2014 .01
-
행정소송에서의 원고적격 : 기존 4개 학설의 의의를 중심으로
행정법연구
2008 .12
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-362-015610317