메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
서양미술사학회 서양미술사학회논문집 서양미술사학회 논문집 제2집
발행연도
1990.12
수록면
79 - 110 (32page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Feminist art movement in America, which was motivated by the rising tide of feminism in general in late 1960s, has been one of the most vital issues of present art world since its inception. The feminist artists, critics, and historians fought against the inequity and tried to change the status of women artists which had been marginalized, if not completely omitted, in the history of art until very recently.
In the 70s, the East Coast feminists concentrated on the protest-oriented public activities, while the West Coast artists fostered female imagery and sensibilities under the initiative of Judy Chicago and Miriam Schapiro. The latter cultivated ‘vaginal images’ and cherished ‘separatism,’ which was widely criticized by many. As the result of the feminist movement, the first a few woman-artist exibitions were organazed, woman-artists exibition spaces were created, and a few feminist art publications were issued. Feminist artists attempted to raise women’s consciousness, and some created female images and others elevated women’s craft to high art. Feminist performances and rituals were also presented, and some artists protested against the exploitation of woman as sex object by substituting male nudes for female ones.
The initial action-oriented movement in the 70s gave way to theories in the 80s, and despite the wide-spread optimism in early 80s, feminist movement suffered a setback in 80s because of the general reactionary and conservative mood of Reagun era. The feminist theoreticians in the 80s were influenced by European theories and methodologies. They criticized the hierarchy of art history and the male concepts of ‘greatness’ and ‘mainstream’ in art. They argued that old art history with women added is not a real solution, and attempted to critique and analyse the established art thinking. At this point, it is too early to evaluate what feminism has really accomplished, and since it is still a vital movement, its full impact on male-dominated art history is yet to be seen.

목차

Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 페미니스트 운동의 전개
Ⅲ. 페미니스트의 미술의 영역
Ⅳ. 페미니스트 비평과 미술사
Abstract

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-609-017288824