지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Corruption in Korea is still strong despite the enactment of various anti-corruption legislation, which lost their legitimacy when they were manipulated by previous regimes in order to reinforce political power and oppress opponents.
Corruption is one of the oldest and most difficult problems to solve. And the Anti-Corruption Act is established to serve to create the clean climate of the civil service and society by preventing and regulating the acts of corruption efficiently. Also, asserting firm action against corruption, on January 25th, 2002, KICAC(The Korea Independent Commission Against Corruption) took its great step toward a clean Korea.
The Commission established the behavioral standards for its employees with an aim to ensure its objectiveness and accountability and thus secure public trust. But Except the Commission shall launch an investigation in the event that any person has suffered a disadventurous disposition in his position on the grounds of his whistle-blowing, the Commission must only refer such case to a competent organization among the Board of Audit and Investigation, an investigative agency, or an agency in charge of supervising the relevant public institution and the Role of KICAC is very limited to take its legal activities on the grounds of the Anti-Corruption Act, unless prosecutors investigates employees on bribery charges.
Under this circumstance, it is difficult to build a powerful community of like-minded crusaders against corruption so that a clean and responsible society can be passed down to our future generations. But, A perfect system can be nullified and changed by a ruler's edict, if its operators manipulate it. In achieving a society free of corruption, a strong will is more important than a fine theory or speech. A corruption -free nation cannot be established unless the leaders of the country set an example by meeting the standards of their words, keeping clean hands, and following the rule of law over their private interests.
Corruption is one of the oldest and most difficult problems to solve. And the Anti-Corruption Act is established to serve to create the clean climate of the civil service and society by preventing and regulating the acts of corruption efficiently. Also, asserting firm action against corruption, on January 25th, 2002, KICAC(The Korea Independent Commission Against Corruption) took its great step toward a clean Korea.
The Commission established the behavioral standards for its employees with an aim to ensure its objectiveness and accountability and thus secure public trust. But Except the Commission shall launch an investigation in the event that any person has suffered a disadventurous disposition in his position on the grounds of his whistle-blowing, the Commission must only refer such case to a competent organization among the Board of Audit and Investigation, an investigative agency, or an agency in charge of supervising the relevant public institution and the Role of KICAC is very limited to take its legal activities on the grounds of the Anti-Corruption Act, unless prosecutors investigates employees on bribery charges.
Under this circumstance, it is difficult to build a powerful community of like-minded crusaders against corruption so that a clean and responsible society can be passed down to our future generations. But, A perfect system can be nullified and changed by a ruler's edict, if its operators manipulate it. In achieving a society free of corruption, a strong will is more important than a fine theory or speech. A corruption -free nation cannot be established unless the leaders of the country set an example by meeting the standards of their words, keeping clean hands, and following the rule of law over their private interests.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 부패방지법의 내용
Ⅲ. 부패방지법의 보완논의
Ⅳ. 결론
參考文獻
ABSTRACT
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
Is Corruption a Cause or Effect?
Global Asia
2015 .03
-
부패인식의 차이에 대한 실증적 분석 : 시민들의 공직사회에 대한 부패인식의 차이는 어떠한 요인에 기인하는가?
한국사회와 행정연구
2011 .02
-
부패방지법과 부패방지위원회의 역할
형사정책연구
2002 .06
-
부패방지를 위한 행정법 제도의 쟁점
행정법연구
2016 .08
-
지방자치단체의 부패근절방안에 관한 연구
한국사회과학연구
2005 .06
-
Corruption and Government Roles : Causes, Economic Effects, and Scope
Korea and the World Economy
2011 .12
-
A Study on Corruption of Public Administration: Lessons from Germany
한국비교정부학보
2012 .01
-
복잡체계이론에 따른 전자정부 시대의 부패 통제 방안
사회과학연구
2004 .10
-
이명박 정부의 고위직 인맥구조와 부패의 관계에 대한 연구 : 정무직 인맥네트워크와 부패의 관계를 중심으로
한국사회와 행정연구
2012 .11
-
사회의 부패수준 및 관행에 대한 개인의 인식이 부패의향에 미치는 영향 : 공공기관 납품업체 종사자를 대상으로
한국사회와 행정연구
2012 .11
-
국제거래와 부패방지의 법리
경영법률
2005 .01
-
反腐敗小說 淵源考
동북아 문화연구
2014 .06
-
정경유착 부패의 실태와 개선방안
형사정책연구
2002 .06
-
반부패 국제 레짐 형성에 대한 비판이론적 접근 : 신자유주의적 반부패 규범의 제도화와 반부패 전략
국제정치논총
2007 .09
-
‘우리 안의 파시즘’론을 비반한다
시민과세계
2002 .09
-
우리 나라 사회복지시설의 부조리 실태와 개선방안에 관한 연구
한국사회복지행정학
2001 .06
-
E-Governance and Anti-Corruption : Korean Cases
서울행정학회 학술대회 발표논문집
2007 .12
-
고위공직자 부패 방지에 관한 형법적 고찰
한양법학
2013 .08
-
미국에 있어서 고위공직자에 요구되는 청렴성, 도덕성의 기준 : 미국의 1989년 윤리개혁법을 중심으로
공법학연구
2008 .08
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-360-017568274