지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This paper is concerned with the evidence for establishing the adjective class. I examine the basis of the classification of the lexical category and then argue that the adjective class is based on the uniformity of the system.
The part of speech is defined as the set of words which have the same characters. These characters are divided into four, the word－formation, the function, the form, and the meaning. Therefore the uniformity of the set of the words is examined whether they have characters in the word－formation or the function or the form or the meaning.
There are the predicates indicate present without the present prefinal ending‘－neu－’. They are very salient. Because only present can be indicated without marking according to the predicates. And these predicates are a lot of. Therefore the set of predicates with the restriction on the combination of the present prefinal ending ‘－neu－’ can be classified as the one of the lexical category, the adjective class. The word－formation is only related with a small of words and various.
Therefore I think that the characters in the word－formation are not the evidence for establishing the adjective class. But the characters in the word formation, which are examined in here are only related with the adjectives. So they can be used for classifying the special word.
The characters in the function which are examined in here, are also found in the verbs. Hence they are not the evidence for establishing the adjective class. But some characters only are related with the adjectives are found. So they can be used for classifying the special word.
The meaning of the adjectives is different with that of verbs. But some verbs have the static meaning of the adjectives. Therefore they are not the evidence for establishing the adjectives class. The most adjectives indicate the static and the most verbs indicate the change. This fact show that the characters in the meaning of the adjective and the verbs match considerably with those in their form.
The part of speech is defined as the set of words which have the same characters. These characters are divided into four, the word－formation, the function, the form, and the meaning. Therefore the uniformity of the set of the words is examined whether they have characters in the word－formation or the function or the form or the meaning.
There are the predicates indicate present without the present prefinal ending‘－neu－’. They are very salient. Because only present can be indicated without marking according to the predicates. And these predicates are a lot of. Therefore the set of predicates with the restriction on the combination of the present prefinal ending ‘－neu－’ can be classified as the one of the lexical category, the adjective class. The word－formation is only related with a small of words and various.
Therefore I think that the characters in the word－formation are not the evidence for establishing the adjective class. But the characters in the word formation, which are examined in here are only related with the adjectives. So they can be used for classifying the special word.
The characters in the function which are examined in here, are also found in the verbs. Hence they are not the evidence for establishing the adjective class. But some characters only are related with the adjectives are found. So they can be used for classifying the special word.
The meaning of the adjectives is different with that of verbs. But some verbs have the static meaning of the adjectives. Therefore they are not the evidence for establishing the adjectives class. The most adjectives indicate the static and the most verbs indicate the change. This fact show that the characters in the meaning of the adjective and the verbs match considerably with those in their form.
목차
1. 서론
2. 품사 분류의 기준
3. 형용사 범주 설정의 근거
4. 결론
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
What is it Like Being an Adjective in Korean?
어학연구
2004 .12
-
한국어 형용사와 비대격
인문논총
2008 .01
-
일본어의 신종I -형용사의 실태에 관한 연구
일본문화연구
2014 .07
-
A Study on the Semantics of the English Polar Opposition
언어학 연구
2010 .12
-
한국어 교재의 ‘좋다’류 형용사 구문 기술 양상 연구
언어와 정보사회
2019 .01
-
근대국어 일음절 한자 어근 형용사의 소멸과 변화 양상
언어사실과 관점
2012 .01
-
학령기 아동의 기술 텍스트에 나타난 형용사 빈도 및 의미범주 분석
언어
2017 .03
-
영어 형용사 어순의 도상성 연구
담화와인지
2004 .08
-
淺析現代漢語狀態形容詞的結構方式特徵
중국어문학논집
2016 .02
-
국어 형용사의 다의성에 대한 기초적 논의
언어학
2011 .12
-
소년원청소년과 일반청소년의 형용사 사용 비교 : 의미범주를 중심으로
언어
2017 .09
-
초등학교 3·4학년 추상어휘 지도방법 연구
영어영문학21
2005 .01
-
부정 요소 ‘안’ 과 용언의 결합 제약에 대한 통계적 분석
언어
2014 .03
-
한국아동의 한정 형용사 배열순서 습득에 관한 연구
영어영문학연구
2012 .01
-
한국어 듣기 교재 제시대화문에서 출현한 형용사에 대한 계량언어학적 연구-중국에서 출판된 한국어 듣기 교재를 중심으로-
언어사실과 관점
2016 .01
-
형용사와 부사의 통사 & 의미적 위치와 용법 분석
영어영문학
2014 .05
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-710-016621827