지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Since l8th century, 'child' has been classified as contrasting to the matured on the basis of its age, and conceptualized as a group of human being that needs protection and discipline. The discourse of child protection was set up with this conception, which had its basis on the orientation of 'blocking child from the adult world'. With development of domestic life, this policy stressed the role of family in protecting child, significant part of which was shared by public school based on modem national education system. Love and strict discipline made by the adults and on the criteria from their perspectives, was main tools for protecting child.
Present korean system of child protection is not significantly different from those 'modem' one, with an exception that it shares bits of contemporary world-wide trends of the collapse of family system as so-called bulwark of child protection, which has made it inevitable that the burden of that protection shall move from home to state. The Korean Constitution has responded to these trends with such words as "people under age"(§32⑤), "welfare of juveniles"(§34④), "maternity"(§36②), and "children under protection"(§3l②). But these all sets the conception of 'Child' only as 'prematured person', or 'person who needs protection of the matured'. Though, in 1991, Korean government has ratified the Convention on the Rights of the Child, there are hardly found any statutes which significantly set up and guarantee the child's 'due' standing to ordinary life community. Even the Constitutional Court regards child as object of adult's protection rather that subject to actively choose its own style of everyday life: the Court said only what the child shall not do, rather than what the adults shall do for child to express and satisfy its desires and personality.
Such approaches are found in most of child protection legislation. This paper makes special analysis on the age with which the legal concepts of child are defined. There are so many statutes on child protection and child welfare, and each of them has its own criteria on age ranging from thirteen to twenty four, which seem somewhat arbitrary without any reasonable justification. The fact that no governmental agency/organization has responsibility on systematic and concentrated planning of child protection and child welfare, poses another problem: each has its own policy, and no one has legal power and responsibility to reconcile and rearrange them into a comprehensive scheme. The Commission on Youth Protection in Prime Minister's Office may take those tasks with some conditional prerequisites.
Present korean system of child protection is not significantly different from those 'modem' one, with an exception that it shares bits of contemporary world-wide trends of the collapse of family system as so-called bulwark of child protection, which has made it inevitable that the burden of that protection shall move from home to state. The Korean Constitution has responded to these trends with such words as "people under age"(§32⑤), "welfare of juveniles"(§34④), "maternity"(§36②), and "children under protection"(§3l②). But these all sets the conception of 'Child' only as 'prematured person', or 'person who needs protection of the matured'. Though, in 1991, Korean government has ratified the Convention on the Rights of the Child, there are hardly found any statutes which significantly set up and guarantee the child's 'due' standing to ordinary life community. Even the Constitutional Court regards child as object of adult's protection rather that subject to actively choose its own style of everyday life: the Court said only what the child shall not do, rather than what the adults shall do for child to express and satisfy its desires and personality.
Such approaches are found in most of child protection legislation. This paper makes special analysis on the age with which the legal concepts of child are defined. There are so many statutes on child protection and child welfare, and each of them has its own criteria on age ranging from thirteen to twenty four, which seem somewhat arbitrary without any reasonable justification. The fact that no governmental agency/organization has responsibility on systematic and concentrated planning of child protection and child welfare, poses another problem: each has its own policy, and no one has legal power and responsibility to reconcile and rearrange them into a comprehensive scheme. The Commission on Youth Protection in Prime Minister's Office may take those tasks with some conditional prerequisites.
목차
Ⅰ. 문제의 제기
Ⅱ. 보호 v. 배제: 청소년보호의 법담론 비판
Ⅲ. 청소년보호와 국가의무
Ⅳ. 대안-결론을 대신하여
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
2016년 개정 「아동복지법」에 관한 법정책적 고찰
법학연구
2016 .12
-
현행 아동복지법에 관한 고찰 : 특히 아동학대와 관련하여
한양법학
2010 .08
-
이번엔 아동을 제대로 보호할 수 있을까?－아동보호전담요원 도입에 대한 탐색적 연구－
한국아동복지학
2020 .09
-
보호대상아동 보호의 국가책임에 대한 비판적 고찰 : 법령과 지침의 분석을 중심으로
비판사회정책
2020 .08
-
아동관련법과 정책에 대한 아동학의 역할
아동학회지
2016 .12
-
아동·청소년·가족 보호체계 개선방안 연구
한국청소년정책연구원 연구보고서
2015 .12
-
아동의 부양에 대한 재검토
민사법의 이론과 실무
2011 .01
-
한국 아동보호체계의 성과와 과제
한국아동복지학
2014 .06
-
아동중심의 방과후 아동보육 프로그램 실행 방향
한국영유아보육학
2005 .03
-
아동인권과 아동학대 : 아동인권수준 제고방안
법학연구
2008 .08
-
아동학대 보호체계 개선방안에 대한 연구
지방정부연구
2017 .02
-
아동보호 개념으로의 아동안전 정책방향 연구- 재난관리 관점에서 -
Crisisonomy
2014 .01
-
아동정책을 통해 본 유엔아동권리협약 이행 현황 분석
한국보육학회지
2010 .12
-
예비보육교사의 아동권리 인식에 관한 주관성 연구
한국가족복지학
2019 .01
-
아동권리협약 채택 20주년의 의미와 과제
인도법논총
2009 .09
-
아동학대행위자와 그에 대한 조치에 관한 고찰
한양법학
2011 .05
-
학대피해아동 보호를 위한 시스템의 효율화 방안
피해자학연구
2010 .01
-
2000년대 한국 아동영화에 나타난 아동상
열린유아교육연구
2011 .12
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0