개인구독
소속 기관이 없으신 경우, 개인 정기구독을 하시면 저렴하게
논문을 무제한 열람 이용할 수 있어요.
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Korean lawsuit system is divided into two sorts. If anyone wants to annul an administrative act by an administrative lawsuit, he must file an annulment lawsuit. But, if anyone wants to protect his right by an administrative lawsuit, he must file a party lawsuit.
In social welfare law cases, Supreme Court has decided, that a person must file a party lawsuit in case of a violation of a concrete right. But, a person must file an annulment lawsuit in case of a violation of an abstract right.
This article criticizes the criterion of Supreme Court. In korean administrative lawsuit system, a person must file an annulment lawsuit, when his concrete right is violated, but the violation is caused by an administrative act. Korean administrative lawsuit system is divided into two sorts by the annulment necessity of an administrative act, not by the violation of a right. Therefore, Supreme Court should present a new criterion about it, whether or not and when any agency's act is an administrative act.
In this article, french administrative lawsuit and german social lawsuit are researched, and almost all relevant judgements of korean Supreme Court are collected and analysed, to find new criteria.
By which criteria must the court estimate an agency's act, such as administrative agency's disapproving or changing a pension, as an administrative act? According to this article, such criteria are following.
At first, when the relevant statute prescribes a due term to file a suit, or an administrative appeal, administrative agency's disapproving or changing a pension is an administrative act. Therefore, in such a case, a person must file an annulment lawsuit.
At second, administrative agency's disapproving or changing a pension can be an administrative act under some conditions, even if it doesn't prescribe a due term to file a suit, or an administrative appeal. It is so, when the relevant statute gives discretion to an agency, or imposes a new payment obligation to an administrative agency.
In social welfare law cases, Supreme Court has decided, that a person must file a party lawsuit in case of a violation of a concrete right. But, a person must file an annulment lawsuit in case of a violation of an abstract right.
This article criticizes the criterion of Supreme Court. In korean administrative lawsuit system, a person must file an annulment lawsuit, when his concrete right is violated, but the violation is caused by an administrative act. Korean administrative lawsuit system is divided into two sorts by the annulment necessity of an administrative act, not by the violation of a right. Therefore, Supreme Court should present a new criterion about it, whether or not and when any agency's act is an administrative act.
In this article, french administrative lawsuit and german social lawsuit are researched, and almost all relevant judgements of korean Supreme Court are collected and analysed, to find new criteria.
By which criteria must the court estimate an agency's act, such as administrative agency's disapproving or changing a pension, as an administrative act? According to this article, such criteria are following.
At first, when the relevant statute prescribes a due term to file a suit, or an administrative appeal, administrative agency's disapproving or changing a pension is an administrative act. Therefore, in such a case, a person must file an annulment lawsuit.
At second, administrative agency's disapproving or changing a pension can be an administrative act under some conditions, even if it doesn't prescribe a due term to file a suit, or an administrative appeal. It is so, when the relevant statute gives discretion to an agency, or imposes a new payment obligation to an administrative agency.
목차
Ⅰ. 사회복지행정사건에 대한 연구필요와 대상판결의 개요
Ⅱ. 프랑스의 완전심리소송과 독일 사회법원법상 이행소송
Ⅲ. 취소소송사항과 당사자소송사항의 구별 - 대상판결의 평석과 함께 -
Ⅳ. 관련 문제
[Abstract]
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
國際聯合行政上의 諸問題
국제법학회논총
1960 .04
-
부작위위법확인소송의 쟁점에 관한 고찰
강원법학
2012 .02
-
환경문제에 대한 행정법적 대응과 행정구제
한림법학 FORUM
2006 .11
-
日本의 最近(2016) 行政判例의 動向 및 分析
행정판례연구
2018 .01
-
동아시아 행정심판제도 비교연구
행정법연구
2008 .08
-
프랑스, 미국에서의 행정행위 개념에 대한 소고
행정법연구
2007 .12
-
中国2014年《行政诉讼法》修正案的主要内容及未来发展
동북아법연구
2015 .01
-
행정지도와 법률유보 및 구제에 관한 이론적 검토
한양법학
2011 .08
-
행정의 행위형식으로서의‘행정계획’개념에 대한 검토－헌법재판소 2000. 6. 1. 선고, 99헌마538등 결정,대법원 1982. 3. 9. 선고, 80누105 판결 및 대법원 2002.10. 11. 선고, 2000두8226 판결에 대한 평석－
일감법학
2013 .01
-
무명항고소송과 가처분 : 의무이행소송의 중요쟁점을 중심으로
강원법학
2016 .10
-
처분사유의 추가·변경에 관한 판례의 평가와 보완점
고려법학
2010 .01
-
한국의 행정계획
서울행정학회 학술대회 발표논문집
2007 .12
-
中国瑕疵行政行为理论及其实践探索
동북아법연구
2017 .01
-
행정심판법 개정 법률안에 관한 평가연구
중앙법학
2007 .10
-
행정소송법 제22조가 정하는 ‘처분변경으로 인한 소의 변경’과 과세처분 취소소송
저스티스
2012 .04
-
行政節次法上 處分基準 設定ㆍ公表와 合議制 行政廳의 行政節次
행정법연구
2008 .04
-
行政節次法에 관한 比較硏究
법학논총
1987 .12
-
중국 행정소송상 의무이행소송에 관한 검토
공법학연구
2010 .02
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
강학상 인가와 정비조합 설립인가 : 대법원 2002. 3. 11 자 2002그12 결정을 계기로
김종보
행정법연구
2003
.10
이성의 현실과 이성의 역사적 현실 : 헤겔 법철학에서 이성과 현실의 문제
박정훈
철학사상
2016
.02
정비기반시설(整備基盤施設)의 무상양도(無償讓渡)
김종보
,
윤지은
중앙법학
2007
.08
지역사회복지정책의 발전과 과제
김승용
한국지역사회복지학회 학술대회
2015
.12
行政法과 法解釋 - 法律留保 내지 議會留保와 法形成의 限界 - : 대법원 2014. 4. 10. 선고 2011두31604 폐차신고수리거부처분취소사건 판결을 중심으로
박정훈
행정법연구
2015
.11
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0