지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2000.12
- 수록면
- 15 - 32 (22page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The traditional culture policy has been one of the important objectives of government's cultural policy. It has been the country's duty to the extent that it is clearly stated in the Constitution to grow national culture through inheritance and development of traditional culture. However, the definition of traditional culture may be various. Because, tradition and culture both are the conceptions which may be interpreted in various ways. Therefore, this article's aim is not theoretical approach or giving a definition. Instead, through understanding the contents and background of traditional culture intended by government's policy, this article tries to find out the meaning of the traditional culture policy and the problems left to solve.
To understand the process of development in Korea's traditional culture policy, it is necessary to divide period into the before and the after around the law for promotion of culture and arts. Because, the cultural policy got into stride from setting the law for the promotion of culture and arts. The traditional culture policy before legislation of the law was mainly about protecting cultural properties. It goes back in history to setting up the law for reservation of relics in Japan's imperialism. However, Japan did not establish the law to really preserve our traditional culture and remains. Because, not only a lot of cultural properties were damaged and plundered but also general destruction of traditional culture was made in that period. Nevertheless, the law remained after the Liberation and lasted until the Cultural Properties Protection Act was established in 1962. Moreover, traditional culture policy except for cultural assets was partly arranged after the Liberation. Even it was not active, the policy for preservation of traditional culture was partly performed by founding National Museum in 1945, and National Korean Classical Music Institute in 1950.
The law for promotion of culture and art which was established in 1972 and the first, the second plans processed based on the law emphasize on the traditional culture policy. The law for promotion of culture and arts intends to accomplish cultural revival through "inheriting traditional arts and creating new national culture". Therefore, after the legislation, the traditional culture policy got into stride to promote traditional arts, which ultimately aims at growing national culture. That is to say, after the 1970s, protection of cultural assets and promotion of traditional arts go together in the traditional culture policy, which point to national culture as a precedent goal.
The traditional culture policy of the 5th republic in the 1980s was a extension of the policy in the 1970s. It emphasizes on the traditional culture to the extent of mentioning promotion of traditional culture in the Constitution. In the 6th republic when the Department of Culture became independent, the unique things of the traditional culture policy were becoming serious about the living culture policy and developing national culture through promoting local culture. The 'Mun-min' government stresses on the national culture by the expression of establishing national spirit. Specifically, the government shows its will to settle national identity through the restoration of traditional culture. It especially emphasizes on preserving documents like conserving records about tangible and intangible cultural properties and investigating the surface of buried cultural assets. Local festivals and the national folk art conference were main parts of the policy at that time. 'The government by people' published 'new policy of culture and tourism' on November, 1998. In this policy, 'systematic preservation, inheritance and development of cultural heritage' and 'the pursuit of balanced development by region and unity of the society based on culture' are presented as important problems. Independence of the Cultural Properties Administration is an expression of this policy. That is, the originality and importance of the cultural assets policy is highlighted.
There are some points in Korea's traditional culture policy. At first, the matter of choosing conservation or recreation is at issue. While the field of cultural heritage which is centered to cultural properties intends to conservation, the fields of art and living culture can not only emphasize keeping its original form. After all, people themselves should be able to preserve cultural heritage and recreate it through enhancing people's approach and social education, through providing specific program about cultural heritage.
The matter of choosing development or conservation is also one of the important issues in cultural heritage policy, which is a sharply divided idea especially in the policy about cultural properties. It is a trouble between the social atmosphere pursuing economical interest and cultural value. Nowadays, the idea pursuing economical value is entering extensively into protecting cultural properties through policies such as connecting tourism and cultural heritage. However, systematic measures for preservation are being supplemented at the same time. For more significant policies about cultural properties, it is necessary to set up a law for preserving historic ancient cities. Moreover, irrational laws and systems in relation to excavation of buried cultural properties should be improved.
In the past days, the traditional culture policy in Korea was performed thoroughly following the lead of government. National culture was also emphasized for the need to create country's leading idea. In the future, however, it is difficult to promote traditional culture without independent participation of civil society. For example, National Trust system is very important as a system of protecting cultural heritage by the citizens.
The value and the meaning of traditional culture are great in the globalized world. Therefore, continuous improvement of laws and systems as well as more various interpretations and practical programs about traditional culture should be made for the traditional culture policy. Furthermore, they should be made at the beginning of the consideration and reflection on the policies of the past.
To understand the process of development in Korea's traditional culture policy, it is necessary to divide period into the before and the after around the law for promotion of culture and arts. Because, the cultural policy got into stride from setting the law for the promotion of culture and arts. The traditional culture policy before legislation of the law was mainly about protecting cultural properties. It goes back in history to setting up the law for reservation of relics in Japan's imperialism. However, Japan did not establish the law to really preserve our traditional culture and remains. Because, not only a lot of cultural properties were damaged and plundered but also general destruction of traditional culture was made in that period. Nevertheless, the law remained after the Liberation and lasted until the Cultural Properties Protection Act was established in 1962. Moreover, traditional culture policy except for cultural assets was partly arranged after the Liberation. Even it was not active, the policy for preservation of traditional culture was partly performed by founding National Museum in 1945, and National Korean Classical Music Institute in 1950.
The law for promotion of culture and art which was established in 1972 and the first, the second plans processed based on the law emphasize on the traditional culture policy. The law for promotion of culture and arts intends to accomplish cultural revival through "inheriting traditional arts and creating new national culture". Therefore, after the legislation, the traditional culture policy got into stride to promote traditional arts, which ultimately aims at growing national culture. That is to say, after the 1970s, protection of cultural assets and promotion of traditional arts go together in the traditional culture policy, which point to national culture as a precedent goal.
The traditional culture policy of the 5th republic in the 1980s was a extension of the policy in the 1970s. It emphasizes on the traditional culture to the extent of mentioning promotion of traditional culture in the Constitution. In the 6th republic when the Department of Culture became independent, the unique things of the traditional culture policy were becoming serious about the living culture policy and developing national culture through promoting local culture. The 'Mun-min' government stresses on the national culture by the expression of establishing national spirit. Specifically, the government shows its will to settle national identity through the restoration of traditional culture. It especially emphasizes on preserving documents like conserving records about tangible and intangible cultural properties and investigating the surface of buried cultural assets. Local festivals and the national folk art conference were main parts of the policy at that time. 'The government by people' published 'new policy of culture and tourism' on November, 1998. In this policy, 'systematic preservation, inheritance and development of cultural heritage' and 'the pursuit of balanced development by region and unity of the society based on culture' are presented as important problems. Independence of the Cultural Properties Administration is an expression of this policy. That is, the originality and importance of the cultural assets policy is highlighted.
There are some points in Korea's traditional culture policy. At first, the matter of choosing conservation or recreation is at issue. While the field of cultural heritage which is centered to cultural properties intends to conservation, the fields of art and living culture can not only emphasize keeping its original form. After all, people themselves should be able to preserve cultural heritage and recreate it through enhancing people's approach and social education, through providing specific program about cultural heritage.
The matter of choosing development or conservation is also one of the important issues in cultural heritage policy, which is a sharply divided idea especially in the policy about cultural properties. It is a trouble between the social atmosphere pursuing economical interest and cultural value. Nowadays, the idea pursuing economical value is entering extensively into protecting cultural properties through policies such as connecting tourism and cultural heritage. However, systematic measures for preservation are being supplemented at the same time. For more significant policies about cultural properties, it is necessary to set up a law for preserving historic ancient cities. Moreover, irrational laws and systems in relation to excavation of buried cultural properties should be improved.
In the past days, the traditional culture policy in Korea was performed thoroughly following the lead of government. National culture was also emphasized for the need to create country's leading idea. In the future, however, it is difficult to promote traditional culture without independent participation of civil society. For example, National Trust system is very important as a system of protecting cultural heritage by the citizens.
The value and the meaning of traditional culture are great in the globalized world. Therefore, continuous improvement of laws and systems as well as more various interpretations and practical programs about traditional culture should be made for the traditional culture policy. Furthermore, they should be made at the beginning of the consideration and reflection on the policies of the past.
목차
Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 우리나라 전통 문화 정책의 전개 과정
Ⅲ. 우리나라 전통 문화 정책에서 나타난 쟁점과 과제
Ⅳ. 맺음말
English Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
한국의 민족문화정립과 진흥방향 : 정부 조직을 중심으로
국학연구
2006 .06
-
한국과 중국의 초기 문화산업 정책과 경로의존성 문제 연구
중국문화연구
2018 .02
-
문화민주주의와 프랑스의 문화예술 지원정책 : 문화 축제를 중심으로
프랑스어권 문화예술연구
2017 .02
-
초등 3학년 영어교과서 문화 분석 및 체험중심 문화지도 방안 제언
영어영문학연구
2012 .01
-
중국의 문화산업정책과 문화원형 콘텐츠 개발
인문콘텐츠
2004 .06
-
한국의 문화재 수출금지 정책에 관한 비판적 고찰 : 한국문화재의 해외 활용의 관점에서
한국학(구 정신문화연구)
2005 .06
-
1920~30년대 日帝의 朝鮮文化 支配政策
역사교육
2000 .09
-
패션 산업의 변화와 한국적 이미지
비교민속학
2004 .08
-
68운동 이후 프랑스 사회당의 문화민주주의 정책 구상
서양사론
2019 .01
-
중국 전통문화자원의 산업화와 그 가능성 - 적용 가능한 산업화 이론 모형과 현황을 중심으로 -
외국학연구
2014 .01
-
Review of Korean Culture
Korea Journal
1965 .04
-
Review of Korean Culture
Korea Journal
1965 .03
-
동서양 정신문화 원형 정립
고전 르네상스 영문학
2008 .01
-
위기감과 자부심 사이 : 북한 ‘민족문화’ 개념의 분화와 변화
역사비평
2018 .02
-
민속문화의 공유 가치와 민중의 문화주권
한국민속학
2004 .12
-
다문화담론과 로컬리티의 이원성
로컬리티 인문학
2010 .04
-
문화연구와 ‘휴머니티’의 과제
아시아문화연구
2010 .05
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
근대 여성지 속의 자기서사 연구 : 성·사랑·결혼에 관한 여성의 서사를 중심으로
이정희
현대소설연구
2003
.08
청년예술가 일자리 실태에 대한 메타분석을 통한 지원 방안 연구
김선애
,
강주희
한국예술연구
2015
.06
1990년대 서울시의 전통 문화정책과 민속재현 축제에 관한 분석 : 각 구별 전개과정과 무형문화재 지정 양상을 중심으로
권혁희
인문콘텐츠
2015
.06
막걸리의 산업현황 및 발전방안
김재호
동아시아식생활학회 학술발표대회논문집
2014
.11
일제 식민지기 재래시장의 사회사적 분석을 통한 식민지근대성론의 사회변동론적 재구성
조형근
한국사회학
2014
.10
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2010-151-001722531