메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
동아대학교 법학연구소 동아법학 東亞法學 第41號
발행연도
2008.2
수록면
81 - 113 (33page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
We cannot raise different opinions against the fact that organized violence crimes are serious and cannot be overcome comparing to the effects on the society. However, it is judged that the organized violence crimes are exaggerated and different form the reality as reviewed before. Not only practitioners but also researchers are responsible for this. Overly diversified concept definition makes us misunderstand the exterior of organized violence crimes and it is evident that empirical research is impossible.
We can point out the problems that there was no consensus in professional group as well as the research direction was wrong from the beginning. Additionally, domestic researchers worsened the ambiguity of the concept of the crime by riding on the international research trend without verification. It caused the errors in the approach to the characteristics of the organized violence crimes, and furthermore they considered this abnormal research trend justifiable which sticks to the countermeasures in the aspect of comparative law.
Therefore, if we do not correct these problems, confirm the criminal exterior of organized violence crimes and establish the countermeasure against the organized violence crimes by analyzing criminal characteristics and crime typology accordingly, it will make depart the theory from the reality as well as interfere the establishment of the administrational policy for social defense.
Therefore researchers and working level workers need to think over and solve the problems. We need to think over and continue the research to establish a doable crime enforcement policy from the effective countermeasures against the organized violence crimes.

목차

Ⅰ. 문제의 제기
Ⅱ. 조직폭력범죄 개념론에 관한 논의와 비판
Ⅲ. 비판적 재구성을 위한 전제조건
Ⅳ. 결론
참고문헌
〈Abstract〉

참고문헌 (26)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-360-018413430