지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 연구보고서
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2008.12
- 수록면
- 1 - 2 (163page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
In modern society, either the governments or the groups that have different social systems should have integration of legal orders at integration to be very much important. This is because politics, society, economy and culture and other areas cannot be completely integrated without integration and maintenance of legal orders. Therefore, unification and legal integration of Germany, in particular, integration of criminal laws has set a good example for Korea.
Since the Kim Dae-jung Regime took power in Korea, the Korean Government adopted a policy to improve relations between both Korea by peace, reconciliation and cooperation, and it has strongly promoted the policy based on separation between the politics and the economy and between the government and private business to reinforce reconciliation and cooperation between both Korea and to revitalize information exchange and cooperation greatly each other and to enter new stage that seeks for development and unification together.
Not only North-South relations but also unification environment has made change so that integration of laws and systems can unify the Korean Peninsula finally. The purpose of the study is to prepare for problems preventing integration of the Criminal Act at the unification and to examine the Criminal Act of North Korea to solve legal problems that may occur at information exchange and cooperation between both Korea. Chapter 2 has investigated not only 2004 revision of the Criminal Act of North Korea but also the Act before revision from objective point of view to examine contents and problems of the revision comprehensively. Chapter 3 has described merge of laws and regulations of the Criminal Act of East Germany into the ones of West Germany after unification to accept experience and lessons of Germany critically regarding integration of the Criminal Act: And, the chapter has investigated contents and characteristics of the Criminal Act of East Germany, merge process and problems of the Criminal Act after unification and problems of the integrated Criminal Act of both Germany. Chapter 4 investigated cases of the criminal acts between China and Taiwan of the Taiwanese Government before revision of laws and regulations of relations between both countries to examine punishment of criminal cases. And, the chapter has investigated laws and regulations of both China and Taiwan that regulate relations of residents at the level of mutual cooperation and information exchange regarding punishment of criminal cases of both countries, for instance, prosecution and exempted punishment of bigamy and adultery cases in accordance with basic principles of criminal cases, and prosecution and exempted punishment of the ones in mainland China who have committed crimes of rebellion and foreign exchange regulation. Chapter 5 has investigated punishment of criminal cases to guarantee personal safety between both Korea. Both Korea are demanded to admit of the realities that both countries reject national authority each other and to start exchange between both countries from internal relations of the Korean people and to make comprehensive agreement of personal safety that includes scope of criminal jurisdiction, joint inspection system and joint justice organizations, etc, and permanently stationed representative in North Korea and South Korea. Chapter 6 has summarized contents above to compare integrated criminal laws and regulations of North Korea in preparation for unification of the Korean Peninsula with the case of Germany.
Since the Kim Dae-jung Regime took power in Korea, the Korean Government adopted a policy to improve relations between both Korea by peace, reconciliation and cooperation, and it has strongly promoted the policy based on separation between the politics and the economy and between the government and private business to reinforce reconciliation and cooperation between both Korea and to revitalize information exchange and cooperation greatly each other and to enter new stage that seeks for development and unification together.
Not only North-South relations but also unification environment has made change so that integration of laws and systems can unify the Korean Peninsula finally. The purpose of the study is to prepare for problems preventing integration of the Criminal Act at the unification and to examine the Criminal Act of North Korea to solve legal problems that may occur at information exchange and cooperation between both Korea. Chapter 2 has investigated not only 2004 revision of the Criminal Act of North Korea but also the Act before revision from objective point of view to examine contents and problems of the revision comprehensively. Chapter 3 has described merge of laws and regulations of the Criminal Act of East Germany into the ones of West Germany after unification to accept experience and lessons of Germany critically regarding integration of the Criminal Act: And, the chapter has investigated contents and characteristics of the Criminal Act of East Germany, merge process and problems of the Criminal Act after unification and problems of the integrated Criminal Act of both Germany. Chapter 4 investigated cases of the criminal acts between China and Taiwan of the Taiwanese Government before revision of laws and regulations of relations between both countries to examine punishment of criminal cases. And, the chapter has investigated laws and regulations of both China and Taiwan that regulate relations of residents at the level of mutual cooperation and information exchange regarding punishment of criminal cases of both countries, for instance, prosecution and exempted punishment of bigamy and adultery cases in accordance with basic principles of criminal cases, and prosecution and exempted punishment of the ones in mainland China who have committed crimes of rebellion and foreign exchange regulation. Chapter 5 has investigated punishment of criminal cases to guarantee personal safety between both Korea. Both Korea are demanded to admit of the realities that both countries reject national authority each other and to start exchange between both countries from internal relations of the Korean people and to make comprehensive agreement of personal safety that includes scope of criminal jurisdiction, joint inspection system and joint justice organizations, etc, and permanently stationed representative in North Korea and South Korea. Chapter 6 has summarized contents above to compare integrated criminal laws and regulations of North Korea in preparation for unification of the Korean Peninsula with the case of Germany.
목차
국문요약
제1장 서론
제2장 북한형사법의 내용과 문제점
제3장 독일 통일이후 동독형사법령의 서독형사법령에로의 흡수통합
제4장 중국과 대만의 형사법분야 충돌의 해결
제5장 남북간 신변안전보장을 위한 형사사건 처리방안
제6장 통일대비 북한형사법령 통합방안
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청이 논문과 연관된 판례 (1)
-
대법원 1996. 11. 12. 선고 96누1221 판결
[1] 조선인을 부친으로 하여 출생한 자는 남조선과도정부법률 제11호 국적에관한임시조례의 규정에 따라 조선국적을 취득하였다가 제헌헌법의 공포와 동시에 대한민국 국적을 취득하였다 할 것이고, 설사 그가 북한법의 규정에 따라 북한국적을 취득하여 중국 주재 북한대사관으로부터 북한의 해외공민증을 발급받은 자라 하더라도 북한지역 역시 대한민국의
자세히 보기
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
형사특별법 정비방안(4) 특정경제범죄가중처벌법등에관한법률
형사정책연구원 연구총서
2008 .12
-
中國 刑法上 犯罪過程에서의 犯罪形態
법학연구
2005 .06
-
[제2부 과학기술ㆍ정보분야] 형사특별법의 정비 및 편입방안
형사정책연구원 연구총서
2008 .12
-
형사정책연구 30년의 성과와 과제(II) : 형사법 연구
형사정책연구원 연구총서
2019 .03
-
동북아지역 북한 형사사법 연구동향 : 동북아평화협력구상 실현을 위한 동북아지역 형사사법 협력방안연구 8
형사정책연구원 연구총서
2015 .12
-
한 · 일 형사정책 동향 비교 연구
형사정책연구원 연구총서
2015 .12
-
새로운 범죄대응전략으로서 화해조정체계구축방안(Ⅱ) - 형사화해조정체계의 구축을 위한 법적ㆍ제도적 정비방안 총괄보고서
형사정책연구원 연구총서
2009 .12
-
조선시대의 형사법제 연구 : 총칙의 현대 형사법 편제에 따른 재정립
형사정책연구원 연구총서
2015 .12
-
형사특별법의 입법구조와 이론적 기초
비교형사법연구
2012 .01
-
남북한 통일 이후의 과거청산 : 통일 전 북한의 범죄행위에 대한 통일 이후의 형사법적 처리
중앙법학
2015 .09
-
형사특별법의 입법구조와 이론적 기초
비교형사법연구
2009 .01
-
2011년도 형법ㆍ형사소송법 및 형사특별법 제ㆍ개정안 분석과 입법정책 개선방안
형사정책연구원 연구총서
2011 .12
-
우리나라 형사화해제도에 대한 검토
동아법학
2009 .08
-
형법각칙 개정연구 [9] : 우리나라 및 주요 국가의 형법개정 동향
형사정책연구원 연구총서
2007 .12
-
조선시대의 형사법제 연구 : 조선 형사법제와 현행 형법과의 비교법적 검토(각론)
형사정책연구원 연구총서
2016 .12
-
형사사법절차상 형사합의 관행의 실태분석과 제도화 방안
형사정책연구원 연구총서
2014 .12
-
사회변동과 형법의 과제
비교형사법연구
2010 .01
-
형사법의 재정비를 위한 기본적 성찰
동아법학
2005 .12
-
형법의 문화수용 – 결혼목적 약취·유인죄 및 독일의 강제결혼죄를 중심으로
비교형사법연구
2019 .01
-
중국 형사소송 개혁의 정책동향연구 : 동북아평화협력구상 실현을 위한 동북아지역 형사사법 협력방안연구 7
형사정책연구원 연구총서
2015 .12
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
獨逸統一以後의 犯罪發生과 犯罪規制
趙炳仁
형사정책연구
1996
.03
북한 「법제정법」을 중심으로 살펴 본 북한의 입법체계
김병기
행정법연구
2020
.02
통일시대의 형사정책과 형사사법통합 연구 (Ⅲ) : 통일형법입법의 이론과 정책
박학모
,
임석순
,
오영근
외 9명
형사정책연구원 연구총서
2017
.12
통일시대의 형사정책과 형사사법통합 연구(Ⅱ) : 통일시대의 과거·불법청산 및 사회통합 방안의 연구
김한균
,
강태경
,
박학모
외 14명
형사정책연구원 연구총서
2016
.12
통일시대의 형사정책과 형사사법통합 연구(Ⅰ) : 동서독 형사사법통합 25주년의 평가와 통일시대의 형사사법통합 과제
박학모
,
김유근
,
손지영
외 9명
형사정책연구원 연구총서
2015
.12
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2010-364-002068651