메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
연구보고서
저자정보
저널정보
한국형사법무정책연구원 형사정책연구원 연구총서 한국형사정책연구원 연구총서 08-18-18
발행연도
2008.12
수록면
1 - 2 (163page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
In modern society, either the governments or the groups that have different social systems should have integration of legal orders at integration to be very much important. This is because politics, society, economy and culture and other areas cannot be completely integrated without integration and maintenance of legal orders. Therefore, unification and legal integration of Germany, in particular, integration of criminal laws has set a good example for Korea.
Since the Kim Dae-jung Regime took power in Korea, the Korean Government adopted a policy to improve relations between both Korea by peace, reconciliation and cooperation, and it has strongly promoted the policy based on separation between the politics and the economy and between the government and private business to reinforce reconciliation and cooperation between both Korea and to revitalize information exchange and cooperation greatly each other and to enter new stage that seeks for development and unification together.
Not only North-South relations but also unification environment has made change so that integration of laws and systems can unify the Korean Peninsula finally. The purpose of the study is to prepare for problems preventing integration of the Criminal Act at the unification and to examine the Criminal Act of North Korea to solve legal problems that may occur at information exchange and cooperation between both Korea. Chapter 2 has investigated not only 2004 revision of the Criminal Act of North Korea but also the Act before revision from objective point of view to examine contents and problems of the revision comprehensively. Chapter 3 has described merge of laws and regulations of the Criminal Act of East Germany into the ones of West Germany after unification to accept experience and lessons of Germany critically regarding integration of the Criminal Act: And, the chapter has investigated contents and characteristics of the Criminal Act of East Germany, merge process and problems of the Criminal Act after unification and problems of the integrated Criminal Act of both Germany. Chapter 4 investigated cases of the criminal acts between China and Taiwan of the Taiwanese Government before revision of laws and regulations of relations between both countries to examine punishment of criminal cases. And, the chapter has investigated laws and regulations of both China and Taiwan that regulate relations of residents at the level of mutual cooperation and information exchange regarding punishment of criminal cases of both countries, for instance, prosecution and exempted punishment of bigamy and adultery cases in accordance with basic principles of criminal cases, and prosecution and exempted punishment of the ones in mainland China who have committed crimes of rebellion and foreign exchange regulation. Chapter 5 has investigated punishment of criminal cases to guarantee personal safety between both Korea. Both Korea are demanded to admit of the realities that both countries reject national authority each other and to start exchange between both countries from internal relations of the Korean people and to make comprehensive agreement of personal safety that includes scope of criminal jurisdiction, joint inspection system and joint justice organizations, etc, and permanently stationed representative in North Korea and South Korea. Chapter 6 has summarized contents above to compare integrated criminal laws and regulations of North Korea in preparation for unification of the Korean Peninsula with the case of Germany.

목차

국문요약
제1장 서론
제2장 북한형사법의 내용과 문제점
제3장 독일 통일이후 동독형사법령의 서독형사법령에로의 흡수통합
제4장 중국과 대만의 형사법분야 충돌의 해결
제5장 남북간 신변안전보장을 위한 형사사건 처리방안
제6장 통일대비 북한형사법령 통합방안
참고문헌
Abstract

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문과 연관된 판례 (1)

  • 대법원 1996. 11. 12. 선고 96누1221 판결

    [1] 조선인을 부친으로 하여 출생한 자는 남조선과도정부법률 제11호 국적에관한임시조례의 규정에 따라 조선국적을 취득하였다가 제헌헌법의 공포와 동시에 대한민국 국적을 취득하였다 할 것이고, 설사 그가 북한법의 규정에 따라 북한국적을 취득하여 중국 주재 북한대사관으로부터 북한의 해외공민증을 발급받은 자라 하더라도 북한지역 역시 대한민국의

    자세히 보기

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2010-364-002068651