지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
It is necessary to have a systematic understanding of historical memories to better comprehend the whole picture of historical conflicts and find ways to achieve reconciliation between the Northeast Asian countries. In that regard, one must understand what the media for the formation of the collective memory are as well as the mechanism of their activation.
This study compared war memorials in Northeast Asian countries, focusing mostly on the Memorial Museum of the Chinese People's Anti?Japanese War. For comparison, it discussed the Independence Hall of Korea. And I briefly mentioned the Hiroshima Peace Park of Japan.
The War of Resistance Museum in China and the Independence Hall of Korea were built out of the need aroused by the controversy over the Japanese history textbooks in 1982. The flow of historical disputes and anti?Japanese sentiments are contained in the exhibition narratives. The hostile narratives concerning Japan are likely to affect the collective historical memory and escalate into another historical conflict. War memorials, which are the sites of historical memory, serve as media for activation of the mechanism of historical conflicts. This shows that the conflict structure formed in the period following early modern times is presented at war memorials. That is because the establishment of a memorial is subordinate to the political and social requirements concerning historical memory. Such characteristics can also be found at the Hiroshima Peace Memorial Museum and the Hiroshima Peace Park in Japan.
The war memorials covered in this paper are all ethnocentric, exclusive and lopsided toward political and social requirements as regards remembrance of the past history. Thus, they serve as media which encourage historical disputes between the countries. This is the most serious problem of the historical memory facing the people of the three Northeast Asian countries. This problem can never be settled without the three countries reaching for reconciliation through cooperation. This paper proposes the following alternatives from such a perspective:
First, it is necessary to think first about whose interest the memory commemorated by a war memorial actually serves. Second, the diversity of historical memory should be secured and historical memory should be briskly communicated so that historical memory may not be influenced by political and social requirements. Third, a certain process of oblivion is necessary to secure the diversity of historical memory. It is necessary to maintain a good distance from bygones, as they only involve foregoing generations.
This study compared war memorials in Northeast Asian countries, focusing mostly on the Memorial Museum of the Chinese People's Anti?Japanese War. For comparison, it discussed the Independence Hall of Korea. And I briefly mentioned the Hiroshima Peace Park of Japan.
The War of Resistance Museum in China and the Independence Hall of Korea were built out of the need aroused by the controversy over the Japanese history textbooks in 1982. The flow of historical disputes and anti?Japanese sentiments are contained in the exhibition narratives. The hostile narratives concerning Japan are likely to affect the collective historical memory and escalate into another historical conflict. War memorials, which are the sites of historical memory, serve as media for activation of the mechanism of historical conflicts. This shows that the conflict structure formed in the period following early modern times is presented at war memorials. That is because the establishment of a memorial is subordinate to the political and social requirements concerning historical memory. Such characteristics can also be found at the Hiroshima Peace Memorial Museum and the Hiroshima Peace Park in Japan.
The war memorials covered in this paper are all ethnocentric, exclusive and lopsided toward political and social requirements as regards remembrance of the past history. Thus, they serve as media which encourage historical disputes between the countries. This is the most serious problem of the historical memory facing the people of the three Northeast Asian countries. This problem can never be settled without the three countries reaching for reconciliation through cooperation. This paper proposes the following alternatives from such a perspective:
First, it is necessary to think first about whose interest the memory commemorated by a war memorial actually serves. Second, the diversity of historical memory should be secured and historical memory should be briskly communicated so that historical memory may not be influenced by political and social requirements. Third, a certain process of oblivion is necessary to secure the diversity of historical memory. It is necessary to maintain a good distance from bygones, as they only involve foregoing generations.
#역사기억
#역사 갈등
#전쟁기년관
#'중국인민항일전쟁기념관'
#'독립기념관'
#'평화기념관'(히로시마)
#일본 역사교과서 문제(1982)
#历史记忆
#历史纠纷
#战争纪念馆
#'中国人民抗日战争纪念馆'
#'独立纪念馆'
#'和平纪念馆(广岛)'
#日本历史教科书问题(1982)
#Historical Memories
#Historical Disputes
#War Memorial Halls
#'Memorial Museum of the Chinese People's Anti-Japanese War'
#'The Independence Hall of Korea'
#'Peace Memorial Museum(Hiroshima)'
#The Japanese History Textbook Problem (1982)
목차
1. 머리말 - 역사 기억과 전쟁기념관
2. 역사 갈등이 낳은 산물 - 전쟁기념관의 설립
3. 전쟁기념관의 전시 내러티브와 역사 갈등
4. 맺음말 - 전쟁 희생자에 대한 진정한 배려와 역사 화해
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
기억의 문화, 기념물과 역사교육
역사교육
2006 .03
-
기념시설을 활용한 역사교육 : 독일의 경험에 대한 검토
역사와 담론
2013 .04
-
‘전쟁의 기억’과 ‘기억의 전쟁’ : 특별한 피난체험을 중심으로
통일인문학
2014 .03
-
동아시아의 역사 갈등과 한국사회의 집단기억
역사학보
2008 .03
-
War and Memory in Korean History
THE REVIEW OF KOREAN STUDIES
2004 .09
-
청일전쟁에 대한 한·일의 기억과 전승 : 증폭과 망각의 양극
역사와 세계
2014 .12
-
학생들의 역사 개념에 대한 이해 양상과 역사의식
역사교육
2009 .09
-
역사적 사실의 특징과 역사교육의 특수성
역사교육
2010 .03
-
歷史的 主體에 對하여
코기토
1980 .12
-
1930年代 中國歷史小說 - 세가지 創作類型을 중심으로 -
중국어문학논집
1993 .08
-
康有爲 『上淸帝第六書』의 사료가치와 그 의의
韓國史學史學報
2005 .01
-
동아시아 근현대사에서 戰爭과 平和에 對한 記憶의 差異, 그리고 歷史敎育 : 동아시아 5개국의 中高校用 自國史 및 世界史 敎科書를 中心으로
역사교육
2002 .06
-
Breaking the Seal of Memory : A New Perspective on Memory of the Korean War in Korean Novels1 after the Post-Cold War Era
THE REVIEW OF KOREAN STUDIES
2006 .06
-
How to Cross the Border of Historical Perceptions in the History Textbooks of Korea, China and Japan : Liquidation of the Asia-Pacific War and Historical Reconciliation
Korea Journal
2008 .09
-
Historical Characteristics of the Peasant War of 1894
Korea Journal
1994 .12
-
歷史小說, 歷史드라마에 나타난 古代史像 고찰 : 최인호, 이문열 소설을 중심으로
스토리앤이미지텔링
2013 .06
-
Constructed Memory in Chinese Cinema: Narrating Emotion in Red Sorghum and In the Heat of the Sun
외국학연구
2020 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
한국전쟁의 공식기억과 전쟁기념관
김형곤
한국언론정보학보
2007
.11
중국의 항미원조기념관을 통해서 본 한국전쟁의 기억과 정치적 함의
태지호
,
정헌주
한국정치학회보
2014
.09
전쟁기념관의 한국전쟁 상징물에 대한 연구
김형곤
지역과 커뮤니케이션
2004
.12
기억의 전환, 저항 그리고 타협 : 광주 5.18 민주묘역과 히로시마평화자료관을 둘러싼 기억담론의 분석
김미경
전남대학교 글로벌디아스포라연구소 국내학술회의
2008
.08
역사적 기억의 덧쓰기(palimpsest)에 대한 국면사적 접근 : “용산 전쟁기념관”과 “제주 4.3 평화공원”의 비교
전희진
,
박광형
문화와 정치
2016
.05
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2010-912-002584389