메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
경기연구원 경기논단 경기논단 제7권 제1호
발행연도
2005.3
수록면
49 - 65 (17page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
With increasing car use and rising roadway congestion, bus service had been steadily declining in quality. Moreover, the highly inefficient, uncoordinated, and unregulated private firms providing bus services neglected service quality and incurred growing operating deficits. The pathbreaking reforms of July 2004 introduced semi-public operation system that retains private bus firms but leaves route, schedule, and fare decisions to the Seoul Metropolitan Government. Moreover, it now reimburses bus firms on the basis of vehicle km of service instead of passenger trips, which should increase incentives to improve service quality and reduce incentives for speeding, reckless driving, and discriminating against elderly and disabled passengers. And it completely restructured bus services and increased public control over routes, schedules, and other aspects of service. In addition, they integrated bus routes, schedules, and fares with the metro system, thus providing a far superior overall public transport system. The overall increase in total public transport trips since the reform suggests a considerable success.
The reforms of July 2004 are just a beginning, however. Some public transport services between the City of Seoul and suburban Gyeonggi Province are not sufficiently integrated. Both routes and fare systems should be coordinated and uniform throughout the Greater Seoul metropolitan area. The T-Money smart card should be valid on all public transport services throughout the region. Finance is surely the most problematic aspect of Seouls public transport system. Modernization of the entire bus will also require additional funding. While passengers can be expected to bear some of those costs through increased fares, as much as possible of the burden should be shifted to private car users. Increased petrol and diesel taxes, car registration fees, parking fees, driver licensing fees, and congestion tolls should be dedicated to a multi-modal transport fund that would provide the necessary revenues for investments in public transport facilities.

목차

Ⅰ. 대중교통체계 개편의 필요성
Ⅱ. 이해당사자 의견 조정 : “버스개혁시민위원회” 운영
Ⅲ. 버스체계개편사업의 주요내용
Ⅳ. 시행초기 발생한 문제점에 대한 보완개선 내용
Ⅴ. 시행 반년 후 버스체계개편에 대한 평가
Ⅵ. 맺는 글
참고자료

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2010-000-003245006