메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
김소영 (충남대학교)
저널정보
한국비교노동법학회 노동법논총 勞動法論叢 第十八輯
발행연도
2010.4
수록면
185 - 218 (34page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Korea introduced the 40-hour workweek system on July, 2004 to reduce working hours of employees and to improve their value of life. In this respect, in order to make corporations more competitive and to provide employees with convenient opinions, Korea started various working systems, such as flexible working hour system, selective working hour system, special provisions for computation of working hours, etc.
This author has examined problems of current working hour systems, which have been done for last five years. In addition this author has studied its improvement of the working hour systems and has finally attempted to provide basic guidelines to solve the working hour problems.
First of all, this author has analyzed various flexible work-hour arrangement systems and its previous history of the European countries.
Secondly, this author has examined a variety of working hour legislations and its international perspectives. In this part, this article mainly focuses on the EU Working Time Directive, discussions of Germany, France concerning revision discussions. In addition, this author has showed legally fixed working hours, harmonization between family and work, work sharing.
Thirdly, this author has probed problems of current working hour systems in Korea, and then has provided guidelines to solve them as follows: the most important thing is improvement of long-term works. If working hours should be shortened, and various working hours are to be managed, family life and work life of employees could be harmonized. In this respect, firm attitude of the current Fair Labor Standards Act must be fixed as flexible according to types of works. In addition, the hardened working hour systems have been criticized for prohibiting different wage systems. Thus special provisions for computation of working hours must be widened.

목차

Ⅰ. 서
Ⅱ. 유럽의 근로시간규제 개관
Ⅲ. 프랑스의 주 35시간제원칙과 단체협약에 의한 유연성확보
Ⅳ. 독일의 근로시간계좌제도
Ⅴ. 시사점 및 결어
참고문헌
〈Abstract〉

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2010-336-002868040