메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
박형래
저널정보
한국무역학회 무역학회지 貿易學會誌 第29卷 第2號
발행연도
2004.4
수록면
53 - 80 (28page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This paper investigate the economic factors that best explain in the decisions of the USITC in administering the injury provisions of the antidumping, countervailing duty and safeguard laws in recent years. It attempts to ascertain how strictly the commissioners have interpreted these laws in terms of the economic conditions required for finding that an industry has been injured and for establishing a causal relationship between imports and this injury. Since the AD and CVD laws are now the main route by which firms seek protection, it is especially important to determine the criteria being followed by the USITC in cases brought under these laws. Others have empirically analysed the decision-making process of the USITC, but their analyses are not as comprehensive, either in terms of the types of injury cases investigated nor in the extent of the time period covered.
Using political economy framework as a background to the study 1 conclude that political pressure measured by PAC contributions has an important influence on USITC decisions. The analysis of AD and CVD cases covers the period after these laws were changed in 1984, especially 1984-1999. The economic data used for the study are taken from the reports of the US industry data. In the probit model analysis, the dependent variable is whether a decision by the Commissioners was affirmative or negative, while the independent variables used are chosen to reflect various economic criteria set forth in the statues as well as possible political influences. In general, the influence of political variables can be effective to decisions of USITC, but PAC contributions are more effective than industry size and concentration variables. Economic variables are also relevant determinants of USITC decision, but USITC's decisions are more favorable treatment for EC than Asian country.

목차

Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 미국의 산업피해구제 조치제도로서의 반덤핑, 상계관세조치
Ⅲ. USITC의 의사결정에 관한 기존의 연구
Ⅳ. USITC 의사결정에 관한 분석모형과 피해판정요인
Ⅴ. USITC의 의사결정에 관한 실증적 연구
Ⅵ. 결론
참고문헌
ABSTRACT

참고문헌 (30)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2010-326-002880980