지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
To close examine the relationship of Taekwondo instructors 'qualities and trainees' satisfaction, this paper sampled 30 training halls to the population of Taekwondo trainees in Seoul, Kyunggi Province as of 2001, and collected questionnaires from total 400 of partially selected male 12, female 8 from each training hall. As research subjects, it avoided low grade students, and made the 4th, 5th and 6th graders students its subjects.
As a survey instrument for examining the relationship of Taekwondo instructors 'qualities and trainees' satisfaction, Yang, Hyun-seok(1999)'s and Lee, Shik(1999)'s adapted and supplemented questionnaire on the satisfaction of the hall setting was used, and its reliability is .62~.84, so its is judged to be reliable.
As data analysis, only effective sample was encoded, ANOVA, Scheffe, standard multiple regression were executed using window programs, SPSS/PC+ Version 10.0 and following conclusion was obtained.
First, to explore the difference of coach's quality by gender, ANOVA at significance level of p＜.05 was indicated as shown at 〈Table 4〉. As a result of verifying the difference of instructor's quality by gender, F value of learning development capability was 7.653, and Sig T=.006, which was statistically significant at p＜.05, and F value of instructor's knowledge extent was 7.51, and Sig T=.006, which was statistically significant at p＜.05. And facility management was Sig T=0.649, which was not significant Thus it was clarified that learning development capability and instructor's knowledge level by gender were factors having a significant effect.
Second, to explore the difference of coach's quality by school background, ANOVA at significance level of p＜.05 was indicated as shown at 〈Table 5〉. As a result of verifying the difference of instructor's quality by school background, F value of learning development capability was 11.832, and Sig T = .000, which was statistically significant at p＜.05, and F value of instructor's knowledge extent was 7.51, and Sig T = .006, which was statistically significant at p＜.05. And facility management was Sig T=0.726, which was not significant. Thus it was clarified that they are factors having a significant effect on learning development capability and instructor's knowledge level by school background.
Third, to explore the difference of instructor's quality by training period, ANOVA at significance level of p＜.05 was indicated as shown at 〈Table 6〉. As a result of verifying the difference of instructor's quality by training period, F value of learning development capability was 5.918, and Sig T=.000, which was statistically significant at p＜.05, and F value of instructor's knowledge extent was F=5.918, and Sig T=.000, which was statistically significant at p＜.05. And facility management was F=6.582, Sig T=0.000, which was statistically significant. Thus it was clarified that they are factors having a significant effect on learning development capability and instructor's knowledge level by training period.
Fourth, to explore satisfaction factors by gender, ANOVA at significance level of p＜.05 was indicated as shown at 〈Table 7〉. As a result of verifying the difference of satisfaction factors by gender, F value of satisfaction factors by gender was F=27.945, and Sig T=.000, which was statistically significant at p＜.05, and instruction satisfaction was Sig T=.086, which was statistically insignificant at p＜.05, facility satisfaction was Sig T=.130, which was not significant at p＜.05. Thus it was clarified that they are factors having a significant effect on learning satisfaction factors by gender.
Fifth, to satisfaction factors by school background, ANOVA at significance level of p＜.05 was indicated as shown at 〈Table 8〉. As a result of verifying the difference of satisfaction factors by school background, F value of satisfaction factors by gender was 10.126, and Sig T=.000, which was statistically significant at p＜.05, and instruction satisfaction was F=39.241, Sig T=0.000, which was statistically insignificant at p＜.05, and facility satisfaction was F=3.712, Sig T=.025, which was not significant at p＜.05. Thus it was clarified that they are factors having a significant effect on learning satisfaction, instructor's satisfaction and facility satisfaction factors.
Sixth, to explore satisfaction factors by training period, ANOVA at significance level of p＜.05 was indicated as shown at 〈Table 9〉. As a result of verifying the difference of satisfaction factors by training period, F value of satisfaction factors by training period was 3.666, and Sig T=.000, which was statistically significant at p＜.05, and instruction satisfaction was F=8.982, Sig T=.000, which was statistically insignificant at p＜.05, facility satisfaction was F=6.235, Sig T=.000, which was significant at p＜.05. Thus it was clarified that they are factors having a significant effect on learning satisfaction, instructor's satisfaction and facility satisfaction by training period.
As a survey instrument for examining the relationship of Taekwondo instructors 'qualities and trainees' satisfaction, Yang, Hyun-seok(1999)'s and Lee, Shik(1999)'s adapted and supplemented questionnaire on the satisfaction of the hall setting was used, and its reliability is .62~.84, so its is judged to be reliable.
As data analysis, only effective sample was encoded, ANOVA, Scheffe, standard multiple regression were executed using window programs, SPSS/PC+ Version 10.0 and following conclusion was obtained.
First, to explore the difference of coach's quality by gender, ANOVA at significance level of p＜.05 was indicated as shown at 〈Table 4〉. As a result of verifying the difference of instructor's quality by gender, F value of learning development capability was 7.653, and Sig T=.006, which was statistically significant at p＜.05, and F value of instructor's knowledge extent was 7.51, and Sig T=.006, which was statistically significant at p＜.05. And facility management was Sig T=0.649, which was not significant Thus it was clarified that learning development capability and instructor's knowledge level by gender were factors having a significant effect.
Second, to explore the difference of coach's quality by school background, ANOVA at significance level of p＜.05 was indicated as shown at 〈Table 5〉. As a result of verifying the difference of instructor's quality by school background, F value of learning development capability was 11.832, and Sig T = .000, which was statistically significant at p＜.05, and F value of instructor's knowledge extent was 7.51, and Sig T = .006, which was statistically significant at p＜.05. And facility management was Sig T=0.726, which was not significant. Thus it was clarified that they are factors having a significant effect on learning development capability and instructor's knowledge level by school background.
Third, to explore the difference of instructor's quality by training period, ANOVA at significance level of p＜.05 was indicated as shown at 〈Table 6〉. As a result of verifying the difference of instructor's quality by training period, F value of learning development capability was 5.918, and Sig T=.000, which was statistically significant at p＜.05, and F value of instructor's knowledge extent was F=5.918, and Sig T=.000, which was statistically significant at p＜.05. And facility management was F=6.582, Sig T=0.000, which was statistically significant. Thus it was clarified that they are factors having a significant effect on learning development capability and instructor's knowledge level by training period.
Fourth, to explore satisfaction factors by gender, ANOVA at significance level of p＜.05 was indicated as shown at 〈Table 7〉. As a result of verifying the difference of satisfaction factors by gender, F value of satisfaction factors by gender was F=27.945, and Sig T=.000, which was statistically significant at p＜.05, and instruction satisfaction was Sig T=.086, which was statistically insignificant at p＜.05, facility satisfaction was Sig T=.130, which was not significant at p＜.05. Thus it was clarified that they are factors having a significant effect on learning satisfaction factors by gender.
Fifth, to satisfaction factors by school background, ANOVA at significance level of p＜.05 was indicated as shown at 〈Table 8〉. As a result of verifying the difference of satisfaction factors by school background, F value of satisfaction factors by gender was 10.126, and Sig T=.000, which was statistically significant at p＜.05, and instruction satisfaction was F=39.241, Sig T=0.000, which was statistically insignificant at p＜.05, and facility satisfaction was F=3.712, Sig T=.025, which was not significant at p＜.05. Thus it was clarified that they are factors having a significant effect on learning satisfaction, instructor's satisfaction and facility satisfaction factors.
Sixth, to explore satisfaction factors by training period, ANOVA at significance level of p＜.05 was indicated as shown at 〈Table 9〉. As a result of verifying the difference of satisfaction factors by training period, F value of satisfaction factors by training period was 3.666, and Sig T=.000, which was statistically significant at p＜.05, and instruction satisfaction was F=8.982, Sig T=.000, which was statistically insignificant at p＜.05, facility satisfaction was F=6.235, Sig T=.000, which was significant at p＜.05. Thus it was clarified that they are factors having a significant effect on learning satisfaction, instructor's satisfaction and facility satisfaction by training period.
목차
ABSTRACT
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 연구방법
Ⅲ. 연구결과
Ⅳ. 결론 및 제언
참고문헌
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
태권도 수련생의 체육관 프로그램 만족도에 관한 연구
한국체육교육학회지
2007 .06
-
The Study on Trainee' Satisfaction from Quality of Karatedo Instructors
한국체육교육학회 학술발표대회
2012 .02
-
태권도장 운영에 대한 수련생들의 만족도 분석
한국체육교육학회지
2007 .06
-
태권도 수련생의 수련특성이 도장만족도에 미치는 영향
한국체육교육학회지
2010 .06
-
경제적 만족, 심리적 만족, 서비스 효과가 재등록 의도에 미치는 영향 : 태권도장의 서비스 품질을 중심으로
서비스경영학회지
2016 .09
-
수업에 대한 교수의 자기평가와 학생평가의 비교를 통한 공과대학 수업개선 방안 연구
공학교육연구
2016 .01
-
일반 경비지도사의 교육훈련체계와 만족도와의 관계
한국사회안전학회지
2001 .12
-
창조적인 태권도인 양성을 위한 태권도 교육과정의 개발
한국체육교육학회지
2013 .08
-
농대생의 농업교육훈련 만족도, 학습전이, 학습지속의향에 관한 구조적 관계 분석
농촌지도와 개발
2016 .01
-
초등학교 태권도 수련생의 참여동기와 수련만족이 학교생활태도에 미치는 영향
한국체육교육학회지
2010 .05
-
체육 실기 평가의 객관성
한국체육교육학회지
2002 .12
-
여가만족과 소득만족이 생활만족에 미치는 효과
관광연구저널
2012 .12
-
A Study on the Influential Factors of Work Type and Job Satisfaction of Physically Challenged Laborers on Life Satisfaction
산경연구논집
2019 .01
-
직장내 장애인 인식개선 교육 강사 양성 프로그램 개선방안
기본과제보고서
2019 .12
-
한 초등체육 전문지도자가 경험한 초등체육의 단상
교사교육연구
2020 .01
-
지방공무원의 직무만족과 삶의 만족간의 인과관계에 관한 연구
지방정부연구
2007 .11
-
서비스 훈련 담당자의 직무만족에 관한 연구
호텔관광연구
2001 .12
-
대학생의 여가활동이 여가만족·생활만족·자아존중감에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구
호텔관광연구
2011 .12
-
호텔직원의 여가만족이 자기효능감 및 생활만족, 직무만족에 미치는 영향
관광레저연구
2012 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2010-530-002365944