메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
Yao Lu (이화여자대학교)
저널정보
한국국제경제법학회 국제경제법연구 國際經濟法硏究 第8卷 제1호
발행연도
2010.5
수록면
314 - 357 (44page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The transitional product?specific safeguard mechanism in China’s Accession Protocol is recognized as an unfavorable clause towards China after China’s entry to the WTO. The inclusion of the SSM in the Protocol is a result of long?term tough negotiation due to China’s special market and economic conditions. The different phrases of the SSM in the Protocol from the general safeguards rules and the ambiguities are argued to leave China at an unfair situation. Especially, the revival of grey?area measures and departure from MFN principle, and some departures from the phrases used in general safeguards rules. However, the language of the SSM in the Protocol must be read carefully, in its context which includes the Protocol and the WTO Agreements, in the light of its object and purpose, and keep in mind of the general?special relation between the general safeguards rules and the Protocol. Then it can be found that not all the different terms set out a less restricted requirement on applying a SSM towards China, some even set forth more restricted requirements; and some of the ambiguities can be solved by referring the general safeguard measure rules, such as Article XIX of GATT, the Agreement on Safeguards and the Anti?dumping Agreement. In order to interpret and apply the SSM in the Protocol properly, the language must be read in cautious, together with the general safeguards rules.

목차

Ⅰ. Introduction
Ⅱ. The specific safeguard provisions
Ⅲ. Conclusion
[Abstract]

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2010-361-002463804