지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The civilization concept began to spread in full scale after the Kabo Reform. Kabo Reform is generally referred to as enlightenment, whose impacts were so powerful that they even said enlightenment became an excuse to destroy the traditional order. The wind of enlightenment gained more momentum as Tongnip sinmun and Maeil shinmun were founded. Even those who studied abroad and returned to Korea joined the trend, launched Hwangseongshinmun, and took on enlightening people.
There were two groups that led the theory of civilization in the latter half of the 1890s; one was those who advocated the theory of civilization and enlightenment represented by Dokripshinmun and Maeilshinmun, and the other was Protestant Confucian scholars represented by Hwangs?ng sinmun. Even though they fell into the same category of civilization, their terms and concepts inherent in their terms varied widely.
What the former group advocated was civilization. They sought after thorough Westernization throughout food, shelter, and clothing and regarded such Westernization as civilization. On the other hand, the latter group set a goal of enlightenment, which was to increase people's intellectual abilities by accepting Western study.
Civilization was accompanied by its opposite concept, savagery. Those who were behind the theory of civilization and enlightenment pursued Western civilization and thus condemned everything not Western as savagery. Although the Protestant Confucian scholars did not use the concept of savagery much, they defined not observing the international laws as savagery.
Both the groups were similar in that they were obsessed with civilization in spite of different directions toward it. The Protestant Confucian scholars maintained a critical eye of Western civilization and pointed out its problems in the early stage. As time passed, however, they weakened in their critical consciousness, being obsessed with the goal of making the nation rich and powerful. Entering the 1900s, interest in civilization would expectedly increase further. The new topic was what should be the core of the civilization.
There were two groups that led the theory of civilization in the latter half of the 1890s; one was those who advocated the theory of civilization and enlightenment represented by Dokripshinmun and Maeilshinmun, and the other was Protestant Confucian scholars represented by Hwangs?ng sinmun. Even though they fell into the same category of civilization, their terms and concepts inherent in their terms varied widely.
What the former group advocated was civilization. They sought after thorough Westernization throughout food, shelter, and clothing and regarded such Westernization as civilization. On the other hand, the latter group set a goal of enlightenment, which was to increase people's intellectual abilities by accepting Western study.
Civilization was accompanied by its opposite concept, savagery. Those who were behind the theory of civilization and enlightenment pursued Western civilization and thus condemned everything not Western as savagery. Although the Protestant Confucian scholars did not use the concept of savagery much, they defined not observing the international laws as savagery.
Both the groups were similar in that they were obsessed with civilization in spite of different directions toward it. The Protestant Confucian scholars maintained a critical eye of Western civilization and pointed out its problems in the early stage. As time passed, however, they weakened in their critical consciousness, being obsessed with the goal of making the nation rich and powerful. Entering the 1900s, interest in civilization would expectedly increase further. The new topic was what should be the core of the civilization.
목차
Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. ‘문명‘ 개념의 확산 양상
Ⅲ. 신문을 통해 본 문명 인식
Ⅳ. 맺음말
참고문헌
〈ABSTRACT〉
참고문헌 (37)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
‘문명’의 개념과 문명사 연구
역사와 담론
2009 .04
-
『독립신문』·『매일신문』에 수용된 ‘문명/야만’담론의 의미 층위
국어국문학
2004 .05
-
동서 ‘문화⋅문명’의 개념과 그 전개 - 현대 문명 담론의 개념적 이해를 중심으로 -
동양철학연구
2010 .01
-
大韓帝國 초기 文明開化論의 발전
한국사연구
2003 .06
-
Three Kingdoms and Their Civilization
Korea Journal
1964 .07
-
A Comparative Study of Several Issues Between the Indus Civilization and the Ancient Shu Civilization
중국어문학논집
2015 .06
-
歷史에서 본 韓日關係와 文明轉換
역사교육
2013 .12
-
우승열패의 역사인식과 '문명화'의 길
史叢(사총)
2013 .01
-
College and the Creation of a New Civilization
Korea Journal
1968 .08
-
강증산의 ‘개벽’과 새로운 문명
대순사상논총
2019 .01
-
A Study on the Protestant Discourse of Civilization in Early Modern Korea
Korea Journal
2001 .03
-
舊韓末 美 改新敎 선교사들의 對韓 인식 : 1884년부터 1919년까지를 중심으로
한국학(구 정신문화연구)
2004 .06
-
협력문명의 사회적 기원―협력공동체의 형성과 해체에 관한 문명사적 탐색―
민족문화연구
2020 .01
-
雲養 金允植의 文明觀
한국인물사연구
2015 .09
-
이광수와 식민지 문명화론
서강인문논총
2010 .04
-
자유주의 문명의 밖에서- 간디에서 이토를 넘어 롤즈까지 -
日本思想
2015 .01
-
Philosophical Foundation of Korean Civilization
Korea Journal
1963 .04
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2010-911-003101063