메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
제홍일 (삿포로학원대학)
저널정보
효원사학회 역사와 세계 역사와 세계 제37집
발행연도
2010.6
수록면
149 - 217 (69page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This article re-examines the diplomatic policy of Japan toward Korea in the early modern era. The previous interpretation was fixed by TabohashI Kiyoshi, the leading authority on the period. According to Tabohashi, the diplomatic policy was executed by hard-liners who insisted on strong diplomacy like 〈Seikanron〉. The moderate-liners who insisted on the maintenance of the status quo were dismissed in Tabohashi’s research. Deliberately or not, researchers afterward have not paid attention to the moderate-liners either. Therefore, inevitably my research object is focused on the moderate policies which were insisted on by Miyamoto Okadzu. I clarify that it was Miyamoto who planned the most moderate diplomatic policy of Japan toward Korea from the establishment of Gaimusho (Ministry of Foreign Affairs) to the making the treaty of Ganghwado island. At the end of the year when the Gaimusho was established (1869), Miyamoto drafted 〈Chosenron〉. It was extremely moderate and can be described as a ‘hands-off’ policy. It was a policy that could be accepted easily by the Korean court. Although there existed a fanatically strong policy like 〈Seikanron〉, it was chiefly the moderate one that was executed. It is very important that it was not a strong policy but a moderate one which was insisted on by Miyamoto after 1869 to have concluded the treaty of Ganghwado island. Negotiation on the treaty was extremely moderate and passive because it was initiated by Miyamoto. Finally I also clarify that it was Miyamoto who planned and executed the appendix to the Ganghwado treaty. Therefore, negotiation on the appendix was also a moderate one. But there was a big problem of legation and a diplomatic agent. The problem was introduced by Enomoto Takeaki who had an idea of power politics based on the British style and the application of international law. Japanese diplomacy since the end of 1876 was converted from the moderate diplomacy of Miyamoto to the strong diplomacy of Enomoto and Hanabusa Yoshimoto.

목차

서론
Ⅰ. 宮本의 〈朝鮮論〉
Ⅱ. 유신정부의 조선정책과 강화도사건
Ⅲ. 宮本의 조선정책과 강화도조약
Ⅳ. 〈부속조약〉의 체결과 宮本외교
결어; 宮本외교의 종말과 일본외교의 전환
【Abstract】

참고문헌 (63)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2010-911-003085940